Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Hillary Clinton ever answer "THE" question? Was she even asked?

Posted on 01/27/2013 7:23:57 AM PST by reaganator

Before the election, and after the murders of four Americans including an America Ambassador, many officials from the Obama Administration, including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, deliberately stated misinformation concerning the attacks that resulted in these deaths. Obviously, this was a planned response ordered by someone. During the questioning of Hillary Clinton concerning the Benghazi terrorist attacks was the following question even asked? "Who ordered you and other officials in the Obama Administration to promote to the media and the American public a fabricated, false cause of the Benghazi terrorist attacks?"


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Another question; someone ordered Hillary Clinton to openly state this lie, who gives orders to the Secretary of State?
1 posted on 01/27/2013 7:24:03 AM PST by reaganator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganator

I know Senator Rand Paul asked her about the cause of the terrorist attack in which she promptly feigned outrage, but did anyone ask her, “Who directed you and other officials to promote a lie?”


2 posted on 01/27/2013 7:33:16 AM PST by reaganator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

does it even matter at this point?

/s


3 posted on 01/27/2013 7:39:18 AM PST by VAFreedom (maybe i should take a nap before work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganator

I personally don’t think the Republicans did a good job during this hearing. Republicans always seem to miss opportunities and then when they think about it afterwards, they are always like, “Oh yeah, we should have asked that question.” Everyone says Hillary dodged questions which is true, but who let her??????


4 posted on 01/27/2013 7:40:10 AM PST by napscoordinator (GOP Candidate 2020 - "Bloomberg 2020 - We vote for whatever crap the GOP puts in front of us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VAFreedom

yes.


5 posted on 01/27/2013 7:40:34 AM PST by reaganator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

But this hearing went on for hours. The question we needed an answer to was not even asked.


6 posted on 01/27/2013 7:43:07 AM PST by reaganator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganator

Benghazi and now Algeria......how many Americans have to die before this administration is finally called to account for their incompetence?


7 posted on 01/27/2013 7:46:53 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganator

TPTB are relieved that the Sociopath of State “testified”. Orchestrated indignation from internal enemies. Questions not asked, answers not forthcoming.

TREASON...in real-time, pre-meditated, unquestioned, in-your-face, indignant, continuous, unchecked, ongoing...

R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods

The agenda rolls over bumps in the road.

Representation? For them: none. For us: none.


8 posted on 01/27/2013 7:47:54 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganator
I didn't watch the hearings in their entirety, but it looked to me like a Hillary slobberfest. The panel spent a lot of time jabbering about her busy schedule, how hard she works and her recent illness. It appeared that she was reading a lot from a prepared text (was she given the questions ahead of time?) and when asked some serious questions, she reacted with indignation instead of giving any real answers.

The hearings were a waste of time and taxpayer dollars. Meanwhile, 4 Americans are dead and it seems no one has the balls to find out the truth and punish the wrongdoers.

9 posted on 01/27/2013 7:49:25 AM PST by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Because it was a dog and pony show.

Not only are the republucans useless, they are complicit in the communist take over of the USA and in total government corruption.


10 posted on 01/27/2013 7:49:52 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

A President of the United States neglecting his duty to protect and defend an American Ambassador while he was being raped, tortured and murdered is the most serious Presidential scandal in American history.

No? What Presidential scandal would be more serious?

“Madam Secretary, who gave you instructions to lie to the American people concerning the cause of the terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Lybia?”

“Madam Secretary, who would give orders in which you would feel obligated to carry out?”


11 posted on 01/27/2013 7:54:20 AM PST by reaganator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganator

The root of the “spontaneous” lie can be traced all the way back to the dems spin after the 1st WTC bombing.

The dems spin after the attack was the attack was because Bush had sent troops into Somalia in 1992 which outraged the muslims.

In reality the attack was planned in 1991 after the R King beating video surfaced. What a coincidence, hyped outrage by the news media after a video.

The dems spin after the attack was to try and make it appear as if the planning phase of the attack was much shorter than it actually was, sort of spontaneous.


12 posted on 01/27/2013 7:59:47 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganator

Hardly any tough questions last week to Her Thighness which just goes to show the political club is loyal only to itself. Constituients only matter in the runup to an election when cushy jobs are at stake.


13 posted on 01/27/2013 8:02:11 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I personally don’t think the Republicans did a good job during this hearing.
*******
The Republicans are content just to have a good seat to watch the game. They’re not on the playing field, they’re mere spectators who are permitted to cheer and boo now and then. It’s really a sad spectacle and a complete dereliction of duty.


14 posted on 01/27/2013 8:06:20 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

There was NOTHING “spontaneous” about the lie of Benghazi. One of the Obama campaign points was that Al Qaeda was defeated.

It is a fair speculation to think that the Obama campaign did not want a terrorist attack less than 2 months before the election. It happened anyway. Obama wanting to keep it on the down low neglected his Presidential duty and did not give the “go ahead” to the military who were aware and standing by. Four Americans lost their lives, Obama and his campaign did not want the American voters to know this was an Al Qaeda terrorist attack. Obama ordered the lie.


15 posted on 01/27/2013 8:08:30 AM PST by reaganator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chris37
Because it was a dog and pony show.

Which ones were the ponies?

16 posted on 01/27/2013 8:24:12 AM PST by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganator
Bunk!

The “spontaneous’ lie wasn't created AFTER the attack but before the attack.

The attack was planned and carried out to create the “spontaneous” lie.

Hillary, Zippo, and all out little lefty friends have been caught orchestrating news stories for the terrorist attacks.

The ‘spontaneous” lie was created to try and make it appear as if the terrorist are so in tune with the news they can pick up on a news story, plan and carry out an attack in just as little as a few minutes. In other words the attack is “spontaneous” with the news.

The attack was planned months before along with the video protest to create the “spontaneous” lie.

17 posted on 01/27/2013 8:28:33 AM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: reaganator

The only question that was never asked; “WHAT WAS OUR AMBASSADOR DOING IN BENGHAZI HAVING DINNER WITH A TURKISH DIPLOMAT”? To this day, no one has asked that question. He could have had his “DINNER”? with this Turkish diplomat any where, why in BENGHAZI? In my opinion, this was a CIA OPERATION that went horribly wrong. And the reason our ambassador was in BENGHAZI, having his “DINNER”? with this Turkish diplomat was to arrange a transfer of weapons from Lybia to the rebels in Syria. It was just a BLOWN CIA OPERATION. As the saying goes; “VICTORY HAS MANY FATHERS, DEFEAT IS AN ORPHAN”. When the CIA OPERATION was “BLOWN”, every body was CYA time. Prove me wrong?


18 posted on 01/27/2013 8:39:59 AM PST by gingerbread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganator
I did not watch the bitch because I knew the lies would come or she would put on a show..I was right she pretended to cry and then threw a hesse fit..I would not imagine she answered anything..
19 posted on 01/27/2013 8:48:26 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganator
I did not watch the bitch because I knew the lies would come or she would put on a show..I was right she pretended to cry and then threw a hesse fit..I would not imagine she answered anything..
20 posted on 01/27/2013 8:48:45 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gingerbread

The congress-idiots didn’t even put her “under oath”...so she could say whatever she wanted without legal repercussions. Just what is wrong with these congress-losers? Feckless.


21 posted on 01/27/2013 8:49:32 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: reaganator; Revolting cat!

IBWDDIM!


22 posted on 01/27/2013 8:57:03 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganator
Actually, I have always had a simple question which has never been answered. "Who said no?"

These people were requesting better security for a long time; then, while under attack were begging for help. So, when they were begging for help, who said "no"?

Now, I believe it was the President who said no; but, Hillary being Hillary, she "stands by her man" and takes the dive. Which, is what she did during her testimony. Probably for a (soft) promise of Obama endorsing her Presidential run. I'm betting she will be disappointed in him.

23 posted on 01/27/2013 9:20:20 AM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Big rats always skate.

JFK executive orderred the public employees unions approval so that the rats would always have funding - with horrific financial consequences for we taxpayers.

Did Carter ever really get the full weight of blame for Iran - much of which is at the root of the current mess?

These days who is blaming BJ for letting OBL go? But he gets credit for the financial reforms the GOP House enacted. How about the “mortgages for everyone” policies that should be blamed on the rats - including Obama, Barney, etc. How about Jamie Gorelick who has 2 disasters to answer for: 911 and the Fannie/Freddy meltdown.

Hillary and Obama won’t be blamed by history. Being a big rat means never having to say you’re sorry.


24 posted on 01/27/2013 9:22:47 AM PST by Aria ( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coup d'etats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganator

So, what did we actually LEARN from this show? Besides Hitlery being the arrogant ass we all knew her to be we learned NOTHING.


25 posted on 01/27/2013 9:22:55 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganator

She has some serious medical issues. She had a blot clot and went on blood thinners. She says she quit taking them. I’m not a doctor, but I think you’re not supposed to stop blood thinners once you start them. And now she’s falling down ( probably passing out) and wearing glasses to help her double vision? She’s having strokes. She’s not physically fit to work in government. I’m thinking she might have an autoimmune disease and she’s “throwing” blood clots. That double vision could be coming from blood clots in the brain or eyes. It might also explain the nastiness. OK, that’s probably just her personality.


26 posted on 01/27/2013 9:28:50 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reaganator

The Republicans couldn’t even find out who hired Craig Livingstone, do you really think they’ll ever get the answer to your question?


27 posted on 01/27/2013 9:49:34 AM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
She is not physically well enough to run for presidency much less being a president.

She has medical issues and lets not forget this during 2016 presidential campaigns.

She also has mental issues....

28 posted on 01/27/2013 10:57:42 AM PST by hummingbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

My question - the one ever asked - Who ordered the “stand down” that got Americans killed?


29 posted on 01/27/2013 3:51:33 PM PST by viccim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

My question - the one never asked - Who ordered the “stand down” that got Americans killed?


30 posted on 01/27/2013 3:52:19 PM PST by viccim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

I do not expect the Republicans to get an answer to “THE” question that should be asked. What I do expect from the Republicans is that they ask the question.

No one has yet told me whether this question was put to Hillary Clinton during the hearings.


31 posted on 01/27/2013 5:28:39 PM PST by reaganator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: viccim

The American military staged in Sicily because of the ongoing terrorist attack at Benghazi, Lybia ready for the word to go. Only one person can authorize them to cross international borders on such a mission, the President of the United States.

An order to stand down was not necessary.

If they did not get the authorization to go, they just do not go.


32 posted on 01/27/2013 5:32:51 PM PST by reaganator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson