Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/06/2013 1:12:06 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: Tailgunner Joe

Is this a trick question?....................


2 posted on 02/06/2013 1:13:01 PM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

What a moran*

* yes, I spelled it wrong on purpose.


3 posted on 02/06/2013 1:25:26 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Yes. Well at least for the country that puts its women in combat. Once you loose a war or two real bad, you don’t have a country to defend anymore.

Therefore, no more war for that country. One less country that can go to war could possibly mean less wars.


4 posted on 02/06/2013 1:25:32 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Pray for revival. <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
It probably means America will be generally more reluctant to send its soldiers to war. It also likely means our enemies will be emboldened to war against us.

So to the person who think America is the instigator of all the world's conflicts the answer is yes. To the rest of us, probably the opposite is true.

6 posted on 02/06/2013 1:28:19 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

That short article was a pile of gibberish, ramblings, contradictions, inaccuracies, ignorance, just useless except as propaganda.


8 posted on 02/06/2013 1:29:08 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Because women are so totally peace loving and utterly immune from conflict or violence. / SARC sarcsarcsarcsarcsarc


9 posted on 02/06/2013 1:30:49 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Um, no. Once the Communist get a social agenda item they like to use it, show it off, get their payback.


11 posted on 02/06/2013 1:33:39 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

How does someone that stupid get published in a major newspaper?


12 posted on 02/06/2013 1:36:08 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Naw, it just means we’ll lose.


16 posted on 02/06/2013 1:51:42 PM PST by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Nuclear bombs meant fewer wars.


17 posted on 02/06/2013 1:52:36 PM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
"Could women in combat mean fewer wars?"

Many feminists have said exactly that.


19 posted on 02/06/2013 2:13:38 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Prénoms in the foxhole oughta really help in combat.
I can just hear it, Platoon Leader, “Charge that bunker”. reply, “OK Sarge as soon as we finish running off this batch of wool”.
20 posted on 02/06/2013 2:17:10 PM PST by X-spurt (Republic of Texas, Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

OK, Sally Quinn, here’s the deal: the men have been doing all the heavy lifting fighting in wars. It’s time to give them a rest and let loudmouthed feminists like you demonstrate female abilities to die, be maimed for life, and suffer PTSD.

Effective immediately all women and gays will be formed into combat units and rotated into war areas to replace male units engaged in ground combat. The males will stand down and watch the girls perform. How’s that? How many women and gays signed up to do this: become cannon fodder? Not any I’ll bet.


22 posted on 02/06/2013 2:30:07 PM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Leftards really are children. Malevolent children, but children nonetheless.


23 posted on 02/06/2013 2:30:36 PM PST by x1stcav (Man up! We're all going to have to become Samuel Whittemores.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

First off Sally, all women will now need to register for the draft, get used to that. Secondly, dear doyen of the DC salons, less war or not, when it comes, the chances of us losing in combat are now greater. That’s reality Sally, sorry if it flies in the face of your cherished notions and the mindless drivel of your Chardonnay friends.


24 posted on 02/06/2013 2:45:29 PM PST by AdaGray (squi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Sure, we can surrender right off the bat because we can’t fight back.


26 posted on 02/06/2013 2:49:50 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Relevant...sort of...
28 posted on 02/06/2013 2:58:37 PM PST by Dallas59 (America died a little bit more on 11/6/2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Sure, I agree. The Army with the women loses quicker and the one without dominates the battlefield.


31 posted on 02/06/2013 3:05:29 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

They might be shorter wars.
And not in a good way.


32 posted on 02/06/2013 3:21:47 PM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Few people would object to women and men being called up to serve in some capacity...

I stopped reading about there. She means a draft, and that claim is so far from the truth it is akin to labeling light as dark.

34 posted on 02/06/2013 3:57:52 PM PST by Utilizer (What does not kill you... -can sometimes damage you QUITE severely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson