Yes. Well at least for the country that puts its women in combat. Once you loose a war or two real bad, you don’t have a country to defend anymore.
Therefore, no more war for that country. One less country that can go to war could possibly mean less wars.
“The opposite of war isn’t peace. It’s slavery.” - Capt. James T. Kirk
It seems that you summed up all of the main points rather nicely.
I will finish that thought a bit more concisely for you, young fellar: "Once you loose a war or two real bad --and let loose the Dogs of War, whosoever was on the receiving end of such utter woe is henceforth deemed to be unworthy of any further dissuasion, as he will be in grievous pain and therefore unwilling to initiate any further difficulties lest he be afflicted with yet more sorrows."
You can "qote" that if you like. (Yes, the misspelling is intentional)