Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tailgunner Joe
Could women in combat mean fewer wars?

The question is fatally flawed because it is falsely premised. The question presumes that war is a result primarily rooted in US aggression -WRONG. The US wages war against aggressors and threats.

The number of wars waged will remain the same ALTHOUGH women in combat will necessarily translate into more women dead and far more women injured. THIS in addition to waging war with women in combat against male enemies who could care less about 'equality' and 'fairness'. The only 'equality' and 'fairness' that will be evidenced in combat will be that women will be just as dead and injured as the men.

War is unfair as in the fairer sex will get unfairly decimated.

45 posted on 02/06/2013 9:49:20 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DBeers
The US wages war against aggressors and threats.

Correctamundo bump.

The only possible reason for demanding that women be drafted for service in combat is a desire to spot the enemy an important advantage, which in turn rests on a buried desire that the U.S. lose its future wars against aggressors and predator nations and NGO's.

Advocacy of women in the draft and in combat units is a Judas offering. People who advocate these measures should be cut off from society, since they've already cut themselves off from faithful support of their fellow-citizens.

47 posted on 02/07/2013 1:44:36 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson