Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/06/2013 9:37:17 PM PST by honestabe010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: honestabe010
Defense against an oppressive government is no longer a valid reason for owning guns

no doubt a propsective slave holder in the new order

2 posted on 02/06/2013 9:42:05 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010

The excerpt sort of ends at a part that seems to possibly give the impression that the article is claiming people shouldnt have guns. This is not the thesis of the article. It argues people do need guns to protect themselves from others but that in the case of an oppressive government guns would do little good against the firepower of the United States military.


3 posted on 02/06/2013 9:46:44 PM PST by honestabe010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010

1. get rid of gun free zones.

2. get rid of waiting periods.

3. knock all 2a restrictive laws off the books. federal and state laws.

4. disarm all federal civillian officers and employees.

5. disband all swat teams as they are not doing the specific jobs they were sold to the public they were going to do - go after gangs and hardened drug houses.

6. treating citizens that use their gun in self defense as a victim of a crime rather than a criminal themselves, unless evidence/witnesses proves otherwise.

7. having courts have to presume citizens that defend themselves are justified unless’proven otherwise.

8. national law preventing criminals and their families from suing victims that shot them in the process of the criminal’s assault.

9. end all leo no-knock warrants. they deserve to be shot if they don’t identify themselves.

10. fire and jail all officers involved in fatal shootings of citizens due to the officers’ negligence - wrong addresses, old address, right address but wrong physical house, etc.


5 posted on 02/06/2013 9:52:53 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010

2nd Amendment bump for later........


6 posted on 02/06/2013 9:57:14 PM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010

I read it. It doth sucketh, verily, Abe. (I got literary myself because auto-correct is convinced ‘suc*’ should be ‘Sufi’.)


7 posted on 02/06/2013 10:01:29 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010

"The enemy cannot fly an Apache helicopter if you disable his hand!

MEDIC!"

8 posted on 02/06/2013 10:01:46 PM PST by fattigermaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010
Woodward is an east coast liberal @$$#@+, who actually believes that the bulk of the US military troops would side with the usurper, Øbama in such an encounter.

Good. Let both of them remain detached from reality. Maybe they can share a lamppost...

13 posted on 02/06/2013 10:42:47 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010

14 posted on 02/06/2013 11:13:10 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010

For one thing, don’t start a civil war.


15 posted on 02/06/2013 11:20:17 PM PST by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010
Defense against an oppressive government is no longer a valid reason for owning guns.

Then the Second Amendment is abridged, and the Contract is void.

16 posted on 02/06/2013 11:23:33 PM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010
Tanks and fighter jets will quickly negate an assault rifle.

Tanks and fighter jets have been around since WWII. Tanks since WWI actually. And all armies are still sending men into the field with rifles and pistols.

17 posted on 02/06/2013 11:25:39 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010

[[Gun Violence: What Can Be Done to Save Lives]]

Simple- Outlaw Liberalism- With no liberals, peopel are FREE to defend themselves agaisnt criminals- Criminals will NOT attempt their crimes in neighborhoods where homeowners are experienced gun owners


18 posted on 02/06/2013 11:53:14 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

More guns.


19 posted on 02/07/2013 2:34:27 AM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: honestabe010
Gun Violence: What Can Be Done to Save Lives
Which is it - do you want to reduce gun violence, or do you want to reduce violence and save lives?

If all you care about is gun violence, just pass a law saying violence committed without a gun is OK. Then anyone who wants to commit violence will go to some trouble to do so without a gun, if possible.

I’m not saying that under a law like that criminals might not crucify you - but at least they wouldn’t be using guns to do it. </sarcasm>


22 posted on 02/07/2013 2:44:22 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson