Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Depressing poll of the day: Public opposes cuts to virtually all types of spending
Hotair ^ | 92/22/2013 | AllahPundit

Posted on 02/23/2013 5:07:39 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Nothing new here, which is the most depressing part. Scroll halfway down the page at Pew and you'll find a table tracking shifts in public opinion on various programs over the last four years. There are noticeable jumps in support for cuts from 2009 to 2011 as America got a snoutful of Obamanomics, but we've leveled off since then — and in not a single category of the 17 tested is there 50 percent in favor of decreasing spending. In fact, in only three of those 17 categories (foreign aid, unemployment aid, and the State Department) is there more support for decreasing spending than increasing it.

The most hopeful graph at the link is one purporting to show that the public’s become “more austere” because the big lead that fans of raising spending used to have over fans of cutting spending is now a bit smaller. Alternate headline: “Blogger’s Friday-night drinking to start early.”


As you see, apart from foreign aid, support for cuts never reaches 35 percent. Even in the case of foreign aid, you have a slight plurality in favor of at least preserving the status quo rather than cutting. There’s not much hope in partisan differences either. Of the 17 categories, Democrats prefer cuts to increased spending in just two; independents in just three; and Republicans in nine — although even GOPers support increased spending for, gulp, Medicare and Social Security. I realize I’m making too much of this; when you ask people whether they want to cut a program without emphasizing countervailing considerations like deficits, obviously they’re going to be reluctant. These questions at their core are really just gut checks on how valuable the public views each program or agency to be. They see comparatively little value in diplomacy, which is why foreign aid and State get low ratings, and much more in veterans’ benefits. And yet, after four years of hot political rhetoric about exploding debt and a fiscal crisis on the horizon, you would think that the numbers for increasing spending, at least, would be minuscule. They’re not.

By way of partially explaining why, I’ll leave you with these two tweets.


— Ramesh Ponnuru (@RameshPonnuru) February 22, 2013

Warning this photo is graphic slasher stuff. Depicts “massive” cuts from #sequester. Scary.…

— Grover Norquist (@GroverNorquist) February 22, 2013

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: budget; cuts; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: SeekAndFind

The only way budget cuts can be effectively polled, due to their complexity, is by making them a freeware software game, of sorts.

That is, the national budget is as complex as are some of the major strategy games. Importantly, when enough people would “play the game”, potentially useful patterns would emerge as how to economize.

The game could even be played as a MMOG, with virtual rewards given for effective play without violating parameters.

Of course, many players would focus on just their area of interest, like some naive teenager would decide to cut the entire defense budget. So consequences would also be part of the game.

Much of the federal government continues to exist solely out of inertia, and the game players would quickly pick up on this and point out the blindingly obvious. For example, the Railroad Retirement Board (created in 1935, current budget $6.95b), has zero reason to exist as an independent agency. By folding it into a similar federal retirement agency, might save half of that expense.

21 posted on 02/23/2013 5:41:58 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlwaysThinking
True. Part of the answer I address below in #15 (and #16; sorry about the double post). But in addition, people have been lied to consistently.

Politicians of both parties will raise the issue of the deficit, and then immediately start talking about "fraud, waste, and abuse." That's a bait and switch. By all means, let's do a better job of policing fraud, but this is incidental to the deficit problem.

The democrats compound this by carrying on as if we could solve the problem with higher taxes on a handful of rich people and big companies, "who are not paying their fair share." This is also a fraud.

But as a practical matter, people get a steady barrage of misinformation suggesting that there is an easy out, if only a couple of simple and relatively painless things were done. And since they are led to believe that the solution is simple and painless, they are naturally not inclined to eat their vegetables on spending reform. They are also extremely frustrated that the purportedly simple and easy things haven't already been done. The default explanation for that is the evil character of the opposition party, and so we're off to the races on character assassination.

The democrats are by far the greatest offenders here, as they lie instinctively and think class warfare is an end in itself, but Republican hands aren't entirely clean either.

22 posted on 02/23/2013 5:43:02 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a

RE: geez...are these the same polling folks that said Romney was gaining ground and could win?

This Poll is from PEW RESEARCH. They were pretty accurate in predicting Obama’s victory last year.

It was ironically, the conservative leaning polls that were off in 2012 (Rasmussen, Gallup, even Michael Barone, and of course, Dick Morris ).

23 posted on 02/23/2013 5:45:43 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I am tired of looking at polls and more than tired of politicians who use them as a voting guide. Perhaps if we had firm term limits that would not be the case. I can just imagine the question here: Do you favor budget cuts if those cuts meant a reduction in your police and fire protection, a decrease in our military, less social security then you now get, double class sizes...on and on.

A question like do you favor cuts in spending if no cuts meant you will get no benefits in ten years.

24 posted on 02/23/2013 5:55:34 AM PST by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This does not surprise me in the least. That’s why “wise” politicians run on cutting “fraud and waste”. That’s about as specific as they get.

25 posted on 02/23/2013 5:56:26 AM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They should have asked which items they would be willing to have their taxes increased to remain the same?

26 posted on 02/23/2013 5:58:12 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Really? So Obama signed these spending cuts into law AGAINST THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE??

This occupant of the Oval Office has a penchant for shoving his proposals down our throats, doesn’t he?

BTW, I bet different results would be achieved if the questions were asked with a modicum of balance.....

I would also be curious to see the demographics of this survey.

27 posted on 02/23/2013 6:04:28 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

And that’s the problem with the way these polls are worded. No one wants to see our nation’s highways and bridges in dangerous disrepair, but bundled into “Transportation” are such luxuries as the $800,000 bike path you cited. Unfortunately, we don’t appear to have any adults in Washington who are able to trim their spending of OUR MONEY by distinguishing between necessities and luxuries.

Our once-great country is being overrun by overgrown, free-spending children who have no idea how to set a budget and be fiscally responsible - in and out of Washington.

28 posted on 02/23/2013 6:16:21 AM PST by SuzyQueIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Its like living in a nation full of children who were never disciplined or told “No”.

That would be the 60s generation. They are now running the country.

29 posted on 02/23/2013 6:17:48 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Compromise of 1986 (bet they don’t teach THAT in school) has failed, decisively.

As with 1850, the result is the extension of slavery to all the states, or war.

Jarvis, Gann, and Stockman were wrong, because they did not envision that the power of Congress to borrow money and send the resulting money to the States, circumventing the gold and silver clause and the prohibition of State paper money would be so abused.

As with 1820 and 1850, the war has been delayed, but the issue is fundamental, and will now have to be settled, one way or another.

30 posted on 02/23/2013 6:28:02 AM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When the economy finally collapses under its own weight, these “don’t cut anything” folks will be crying for their taxpayer-provided benefits to be restored.

I suspect those of us preparing right now will have the last laugh.

31 posted on 02/23/2013 6:51:24 AM PST by upchuck (nobama fact #69: For each job created by the nobama administration, 75 people went on food stamps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Tell me that this poll wasn’t taken in downtown Detroit or Washington DC, or St. Louis or Philadelphia, etc.

Once you give something to these “takers”, they will scream bloody murder if you even try to take anything from them. Same goes for the unions. Look what happened in Wisconsin.

32 posted on 02/23/2013 6:53:52 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: qwerty1234

“Free stuff” will always be free for most people. The rich — who will always be in the minority, by definition — will fund the cushy life of the majority.

The low-information majority, educated in public schools and not taught values of faith and sacrifice by their parent(s) — will never understand.

33 posted on 02/23/2013 7:03:03 AM PST by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The RAT party and their sponsors know precisely what the game plan is, and they are playing it out very very masterfully. Get enough folk dependent on Santa Claus and there will be no stopping this train until it results in the ultimate train wreck - collapse of the US Dollar. The Bond markets will be the signal the end is within seeing fast that occurs is any ones guess but in this age of electronic communication my guess it will all be over in less than a day.
34 posted on 02/23/2013 7:10:27 AM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The only thing a poll like this tells is the bias of the group that paid for it.

35 posted on 02/23/2013 7:10:27 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Real problem is that it seems everyone wants cuts for the other guys...but not for themselves

Most folks want reduction in foreign aid...yet we still give away $$$ to foreign nations like candy to a sweet tooth....whether it is direct aid or bad Free Trade deals.

I would also prefer to end all foreign aid instead of cutting veterans benefits....but both parties seem to prefer Globalism over Americanism

36 posted on 02/23/2013 7:16:16 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It doesn’t matter whether the public supports or opposes it. The math doesn’t work. The money isn’t there.

37 posted on 02/23/2013 7:19:33 AM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: THX 1138
Since when have we paid attention to left wing push polls?

As long as we have childishly decided to ignore polls that tell us things we don't want to believe.

38 posted on 02/23/2013 7:35:11 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

What makes this more depressing is that foreign aid and the State Department are the most microscopic spending items on the poll; we could totally eliminate both and it wouldn’t make the slightest bit of difference for the deficit.

What is really hilarious are the polls that ask people to estimate what portion of the budget is foreign aid - you end up with ridiculous 25% estimates when it’s actually 1%.

39 posted on 02/23/2013 7:39:11 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I look at it this way. Only 20 second soundbite, low information Gangham style “voters” are dumb enough to answer the phone when these annoying pollsters call. Caller I.D. is our friend.

40 posted on 02/23/2013 7:57:42 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (It's time for Americans to stand up to the public servants! This is OUR country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson