Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gabby Giffords' husband (Mark Kelly) buys AR-15
Breitbart ^ | 3/9/13 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 03/09/2013 4:34:25 PM PST by pacificpundit

Mark E. Kelly, gun-control proponent and husband to former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, recently purchased an AR-15 (an "assault weapon," he called it)—which he now says he intended as an illustration of the need for more stringent gun laws.

Kelly reportedly bought the AR-15 and a 1911-style semi-automatic pistol at Diamondback Police Supply in Tucson, Arizona.

Various sources contacted Breitbart News once Kelly made the purchase, and after we began investigating the details surrounding the purchase, Kelly announced on his Facebook that he was not going to keep the AR-15, which he has yet to pick up from the store.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: ar15; arizona; banglist; demagogicparty; giffords; guncontrol; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-128 next last
To: pacificpundit
which he now says he intended as an illustration of the need for more stringent gun laws.

If that was true he would have bought it from a private seller at a gunshow, not from a Police Supply Store ("where the gangbangers shop").

He saw it on sale, had a man moment: "shiny".

61 posted on 03/09/2013 5:18:02 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (I think, therefore I am what I yam, and that's all I yam - "Popeye" Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

62 posted on 03/09/2013 5:18:22 PM PST by entropy12 (The republic is doomed cuz people have figured out they can get free stuff by voting democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

“I don’t have possession of it yet but I’ll be turning it over to the Tucson PD when I do. “

Why?

He can give it to me if he really doesn’t want it.


63 posted on 03/09/2013 5:19:19 PM PST by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

64 posted on 03/09/2013 5:19:41 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

I hadn’t thought of that. The PTB aren’t going to go along with that are they?


65 posted on 03/09/2013 5:20:31 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

“I fail to see what he intends to prove.”

...3) bed-wetting, afraid-of-his-shadow, hypocritical pussy.


66 posted on 03/09/2013 5:21:34 PM PST by castlebrew (Gun Control means hitting where you're aiming!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Got caught and came up with a thin story to cover it. Typical libs. They don’t want to live by the rules they promote; they just want you to live by them.


67 posted on 03/09/2013 5:22:08 PM PST by Brownie63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: castlebrew

forgot “opportunistic”


68 posted on 03/09/2013 5:25:18 PM PST by castlebrew (Gun Control means hitting where you're aiming!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

He is proving that liberals should be on the “do not sell” list for firearms.

He’s saying that since there is no scum lower or more immoral than a hypocrite liberal, this proves that any bad guy can buy a gun.


69 posted on 03/09/2013 5:26:46 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
"Hammers kill more people than “assault Rifles” so it is a good thing he did not buy a hammer."

They are already in the process of banning cars, which kill more people than hammers AND bullets.

70 posted on 03/09/2013 5:30:53 PM PST by redhead (NO GROUND TO THE DEVIL! America needs our prayers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

Possibly he believes as a democrat he’s not mentally stable and shouldn’t have been sold any weapon. He’s probably saying our background checks are insufficient for not asking if he was a democrat.


71 posted on 03/09/2013 5:34:36 PM PST by duffee (NO poll tax, NO tax on firearms, ammunition or gun safes. NO gun free zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Is he a felon? No. Is he lawfully banned from buying a firarm? No.

This is like a 21 yr old exposing how easy it is to buy alcohol.


72 posted on 03/09/2013 5:40:59 PM PST by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Back when 911 happened, & the controversy over arming pilots, I was talking to someone who had been in the airline industry. He was talking about a pilot he knew & going off on a rant on how this guy should never be allowed to carry a gun in the plane. Unfortunately, I was polite & didn’t ask what the H*LL a guy like that was doing in charge of hundreds of passengers & a multi-million dollar aircraft. These folks just don’t think.


73 posted on 03/09/2013 5:44:48 PM PST by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks pacificpundit.
which he now says he intended as an illustration of the need for more stringent gun laws

74 posted on 03/09/2013 5:45:45 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit
Shut up Mark. You're a nobody.

Mark Kelly - Look at me! I'm important.

75 posted on 03/09/2013 5:48:37 PM PST by Darren McCarty (If most people were more than keyboard warriors, we might have won the election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit
Their ad was disgusting. When she got shot it was despicable. It was no reason to use her like that.
76 posted on 03/09/2013 5:50:39 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

So he’s saying that astronauts should be prohibited from buying firearms because they’re unstable?


“Depends”


77 posted on 03/09/2013 5:51:37 PM PST by Rides_A_Red_Horse (Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
I hadn’t thought of that. The PTB aren’t going to go along with that are they?

Probably not, but that would be my defense.

78 posted on 03/09/2013 5:53:57 PM PST by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
“Depends”

Nice unstable astronaut reference.

79 posted on 03/09/2013 6:01:34 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Strangely, everything I ever own I will have always owned. I’m a pre-ban man!


80 posted on 03/09/2013 6:13:05 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson