Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cherokee1
Maybe she is just honoring her predecessors on the throne of England.

William II, Richard I, Edward II, James I, William III.

I think all of them are at least suspected of having been homosexuals, although perhaps in one or another case it was just malicious rumor not based on fact.

48 posted on 03/10/2013 4:04:13 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus

could not careless what they do in their bedroom but this crap of dscrimination and freak parades as well as special rights is absurd.

If I want to marry my daughter and she said yes ten is that discrimination, if her borther wants to marry the horse is that discrimination, after all it;s all about lvoe right?

If our side actually started speaking up about this and putting these questions out and asking these homosexuals would they support polygamy then we would be able to expose their pathetic agenda but no, course not because the DC, north east elitist morans have a so called friend or family member which likes getting off with feces and asses.

As for the Queen did she state homosexuals can marry or was she really talking about Williams daughter to the throne?


50 posted on 03/10/2013 5:46:55 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson