Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Startup turning natural gas glut into gasoline
Fuel Fix ^ | March 11, 2013 | David R. Baker

Posted on 03/11/2013 11:02:28 AM PDT by thackney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: bigbob

Team’s Work Uses a Virus to Convert Methane to Ethylene
http://siluria.com/admin/Resourcesfiles/4e6a10889621fnyt.pdf

Not Fischer-Tropsch


21 posted on 03/11/2013 12:18:04 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
The most common process for making liquid fuels from natural gas or coal, a process known as Fischer-Tropsch, needs temperatures on the order of 600 degrees Fahrenheit.

A power producing gas turbine at say 25% efficiency can produce electricity from natural gas with copious exhaust gas at 900 DEGF.

Plenty of heat for a back end Fischer-Tropsch catalyst.

22 posted on 03/11/2013 12:39:59 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

Yes, but also plenty of heat for an expander or some other use of the “waste heat.”

Keep in mind this is talking about a different process.


23 posted on 03/11/2013 12:44:04 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

They’re more likely to get government interference.


24 posted on 03/11/2013 12:46:08 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

The only ‘Government assistance’ they will get is to stop them from what they are trying to do...............


25 posted on 03/11/2013 1:12:44 PM PDT by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

***** “I definitely wouldn’t invest in these guys unless it was play money” ******

I invested play money in Turkey Guts to Gas and lost Boardwalk and Park Place.

TT


26 posted on 03/11/2013 1:25:59 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“Dineen most recently served as CEO of LS9, a renewable fuel and chemical company in South San Francisco”

That is all I need to know. Renewable=Subsidy.


27 posted on 03/11/2013 2:03:29 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
but their business model could be destroyed by a massive crude price collapse to $50 a barrel or something.

Exactly. Case in point, in the early 80's oil recyclers and reclaimers were booming, rolling in the dough, and living the good life. By the mid '80's most of them became industrial metal graveyards and superfund sites.

28 posted on 03/11/2013 3:59:04 PM PDT by catfish1957 (My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Most operating crackers have a nameplate capacity in the 3-5 B lb. range per year. That would be a lot of hard working viruses there.


29 posted on 03/11/2013 4:02:32 PM PDT by catfish1957 (My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Fischer-Tropsch predates WWII, where the Germans used it.

It has been used by Sasol in South Africa, since the 1950s.

Now this guy promises a pilot plant next year, has raised $66 million.

As a fellow Californians, and not wanting to be too cranky, I wonder if this South San Francisco venture is science or finance?

It doesn’t seem like super high tech, and I would expect the major oil and refining companies would be all over it, if it really makes sense and cents.


30 posted on 03/11/2013 4:32:53 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

I’m all for the use of natural gas. The use of LP gas is used within the U.S. exisiting gasoline powered vehicles are easily converted to use LPG. BTW I heat my home with it. Seems it’s more efficient than fuel oil and a Hell of a lot cheaper.


31 posted on 03/11/2013 8:32:25 PM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thackney; All

Japan LNG imports in 2012 ranged from about $15 to $18 per million BTU (MMBTU).

WTI crude oil is about $93/bbl, at 5.8 MMBTU/BBL = $16/MMBTU.

Brent crude at $110/BBL = $19/MMBTU.

So there is a reasonable match in the cost of LNG shipments to Japan, versus the world crude prices.

Now to Natural Gas versus Gasoline in North America.

Natural Gas at the Henry Hub is running about $3.50 per MMBTU.

Gasoline is generally 8 gallons per MMBTU, so at $3.50 a gallon that is $28 per MMBTU

So natural gas is 1/8th the cost of gasoline per MMBTU.

Liguid gasoline is roughly worth 8 times more than natural gas.

This leaves a good amount of margin for a cost-effective NG to Gasoline conversion process here at home.

THIS is also why we need to develop LNG exports, there is a big market for this as well. All in all, exporting LNG and bringing $’s into the US is a good thing.


32 posted on 03/11/2013 8:39:06 PM PDT by muffaletaman (IMNSHO - I MIGHT be wrong, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

“Anybody got an idea how this impacts the carbon issue?”

Quit parroting the BS that was fed you in the public doctronazation system and smarten up, CARBON ISN/T AN ISSUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


33 posted on 03/11/2013 8:49:32 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muffaletaman
WTI crude oil is about $93/bbl, at 5.8 MMBTU/BBL = $16/MMBTU.

Brent crude at $110/BBL = $19/MMBTU.

So there is a reasonable match in the cost of LNG shipments to Japan, versus the world crude prices.

WTI is the price at land-locked Cushing, Oklahoma. If you bring the same grade oil to the coast, it rises in value about ~$20/barrel. WTI has not represented world prices of light sweet for years. Brent is the new world standard and now trades a higher volume than WTI.


34 posted on 03/12/2013 5:44:29 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I know.

That is what it is now.

That is part of the point, these are the current economic conditions.

I’ve been in the oil business since 1977 so I’ve seen all the booms and busts in natural gas and crude prices for a while...

;-)


35 posted on 03/15/2013 7:42:44 PM PDT by muffaletaman (IMNSHO - I MIGHT be wrong, but I doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

“I invested play money in Turkey Guts to Gas and lost Boardwalk and Park Place.”

What ever happened to that technology? It looked really promising.


36 posted on 03/17/2013 9:28:49 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Doc91678
Because the current infrastructure supports another technology that has been in place for over 100 years ? therefore more easy to get it to the market place and can make a profit on it ? i.e. the gasoline internal combustion engine.
Your right, why convert natural gas in it's natural state that can be used in vehicles anyway ?
Because there are more internal combustion engines that run on gasoline than natural gas and many people can't afford to covert their cars, trucks over to running on natural gas.
Yes, there are inherent dangers in running both but I still feel safer running gasoline in my car that running natural gas.
37 posted on 08/27/2013 11:16:04 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
In the near or far future at some point the business case won't matter and the need for any kind of fuels to run cars will take priority.
Can't have a economy without oil at this time.
Yes, I know that you can't work for free but also said is ? can't live without water, the same goes with fuel, gasoline.
38 posted on 08/27/2013 11:23:00 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k
Would garbage incinerators produce the same amount of heat ?
What about bio-mass incinerators ? bio-mass power plants ?
Wood pellet power plants ?
In one of those western states there is a woman CEO that claims that their bio-mass/garbage incinerator that operates on the gasification process can produce high grade " Racing Fuels " for race cars... would it not also be able to produce high grade jet fuels also ?
39 posted on 08/27/2013 11:28:42 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

If it can be produced from a heat source of the bio-mass/gasification process that uses bio-mass or garbage then it would be carbon neutral to make the environmental wackos happy.


40 posted on 08/27/2013 11:30:55 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson