Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner: House Will Fund Obamacare in CR; Won't Risk 'Shutting Down the Government'
CNS News ^ | 3/14/2013 | Elizabeth Harrington

Posted on 03/16/2013 4:28:50 AM PDT by IbJensen

(CNSNews.com) – House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said he would not include language to defund Obamacare in the continuing resolution bill when it returns to the House, stating, “our goal” is “not to shut down the government.”

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) offered an amendment to the Senate version of the CR that would have defunded Obamacare. However, the Senate is controlled by Democrats and, on Wednesday, Cruz's amendment failed.

Cruz pointed out, however, that if the Senate CR differs at all from the one passed previously by the House, the House would have another chance to vote on it, and could amend it then to defund Obamacare.

Under the Constitution, the Executive Branch cannot spend any money from the Treasury unless it is appropriated by a law passed by Congress. The government is now spending money under a CR that expires on March 27. For the government to spend money after that date, Congress needs to pass a new CR appropriating the money. If that CR prohibits the administration from spending money to implement Obamacare, President Obama cannot spend money implementing Obamacare.

Were the House to pass a CR prohibiting funding of Obamacare the only way the president or Democrat-controlled Senate could get money to implement Obamacare would be to refuse to pass the CR and thus shut down government funding for everything else until the Republican House relented and agreed to fund Obamacare.

If the House refused to fund Obamacare, it could not be implemented.

During his weekly press conference on Capitol Hill on Thursday, CNSNews.com asked Boehner if he agreed with Cruz's suggestion that the Republican House should put language in the CR defunding Obamacare when the Senate version of the CR comes back to the House.

“We have voted many times over the last 2 years that we've been in the majority to defund Obamacare, to repeal Obamacare, and we will do so again here in the House in the coming months," Boehner said. "Our goal here is to cut spending.”

“It’s not to shut down the government,” he said.

“I believe that trying to put Obamacare on this vehicle risks shutting down the government,” Boehner said. “That’s not what our goal is. Our goal here is to reduce spending.”

House Republicans have symbolically voted to repeal Obamacare more than 30 times in legislation that did not need to pass. However, every time they have enacted legislation that must-pass to keep the government funded, they have declined to include language that would repeal all or any part of Obamacare or that would withhold funding for all or any part of Obamacare.

The initial $982-billion version of the CR to fund the government after March 27, which passed the House last week, included funding to implement Obamacare. The CR is now being deliberated in the Senate, and if it is amended, will return to the House.

On Wednesday, Sen. Cruz introduced an amendment to the CR that would have delayed funding for Obamacare until economic growth returns to historic averages. The amendment failed in the Senate, 45-52.

Though he did not expect the amendment to pass, Cruz said it was important to stand on “principle,” and urged Republicans in the House to do the same.

“I think it’s the right position for Republicans to be taking,” Cruz told CNSNews.com on Wednesday. “And I think it would be exactly the right decision to then send it back to Harry Reid and President Obama and ask if Harry Reid and President Obama are willing to try to shut the government down in order to insist that Obamacare be fully funded now, even though it could well push us into a recession.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: boehner; boneheadboehner; defundobamacare; dumpboehner; fireboehner; obozocare; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-78 last
To: IbJensen

Yes. That’s it. But when the light (their job description - protecting and defending the Constitution) shines on that attitude and on her enablers, they sure do huff, and screech and scramble.


51 posted on 03/16/2013 7:08:07 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

When the RATs are in power, they spend and tax, spend and tax, ad infinitum.

When the Whigs are in power, they spend and tax, spend and tax, ad infinitum.

Same broken record. Elections have become the equivalent of gladiator contests. Even wrestling is more real.

If I had my druthers, I’d arrest them all and banish them to a deserted island. The only problem is that there are more ready to take their place.


52 posted on 03/16/2013 7:09:26 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
obamacare will be repealed within a year, you can bet the house on it and it will be repealed with almost as many democrat votes as republican

Whatever it is you're smoking, you should stop.

53 posted on 03/16/2013 7:14:45 AM PDT by jpl (The government spent another half a million bucks in the time it just took you to read this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Partially, there are some worth keeping. Not many for sure, but some.

If the House GOPe leadership were out that might enable more Reps to stand up. The grander question is, how to shuck Boehner and his cabal before 2014?


54 posted on 03/16/2013 7:18:50 AM PDT by X-spurt (Republic of Texas, Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

>>> “I believe that trying to put Obamacare on this vehicle risks shutting down the government,” Boehner said.

‘.... risks shutting down the government’, THE RISK???!!!

You fool. Shut down the government now, pass emergency resolution for each absolute essential government function individaully.


55 posted on 03/16/2013 7:21:29 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Boehner must go!


56 posted on 03/16/2013 7:30:31 AM PDT by RedMDer (Support Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

When the evil Obama regime screws us we’re very angry.

When we see incompetence in the jerks we’ve elected to represent us it makes us so damned mad we want to throw them into the Potomac.

Come to think of it all but a very select few should be tossed into the Potomac after a healthy dose of hot tar and feathers.


57 posted on 03/16/2013 7:30:44 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Paging Lorena Bobbitt...


58 posted on 03/16/2013 7:31:14 AM PDT by polymuser ("We have a right to debate and disagree with any administration!" (HRC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne
I agree with you. Their is nothing we can do about it. The people who are in charge are the ones who have been in charge for years. You must get out of your mind that the core group is for anything but to keep and get more power. Stop thinking in the left and right, but in what the leaders are doing. The group of e-pubs and rats who are in charge.

The people who put all this crap in place are still there. We have repub congressman who got elected on tea party principles who voted against the very people who put them there. Now, these so called people are looking for help from the speaker to ward off another tea party challenge because they lied to the group that got them there

It is not left or right. that is all smoke. Regards

59 posted on 03/16/2013 7:35:30 AM PDT by luv2ndamend (Same party, different letter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sunny48
That was a great moment. Cruz won, because Feinstein blustered and barked but never answered the question, because she couldn't.
60 posted on 03/16/2013 7:55:19 AM PDT by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

What an emasculated, worthless, crybaby.


61 posted on 03/16/2013 8:16:54 AM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I have one word for Mr. Boehner ....

TRAITOR!!!


62 posted on 03/16/2013 8:19:53 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I saw that and her. She is as ugly on the outside as she is inside, totally evil.


63 posted on 03/16/2013 9:23:49 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

“Obamacare is a truly horrific piece of legislation. It is so bad, the democrat congressmen will be begging for massive changes a few months before or a few months after Jan 1, 2014.”

I agree. Timing is everything. The MSM would guarantee that any citizen shutdown pain would be blamed on Boehner.

As you point out, every day that goes by even the low-information voters one by one are coming around to seeing that they will only be able to chose between unaffordable healthcare or getting fined and having your refund seized by the IRS for refusing to buy unaffordable healthcare.

Also, the spotlight is on the Senate Dems’ first budget in four years to be followed by Barry’s budget in early April and the circular firing squad on the left is vicious as the 80 Communists in the House Progressive Caucus screams murder over any Medicare/Medicaid/SS cuts.

Only after that does the next vote to raise the debt ceiling occur. That is when it will be best to force defunding/delay of Obamacare, IMO.


64 posted on 03/16/2013 9:48:53 AM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SERE_DOC
Why wait for another crooked election They will never relinquish power unless forced.

Absolutely!! There will not be any conservative agenda ever initiated unless the left is destroyed. They will only go if by direct force. The conservatives have no will to do such, ergo this nation will slither away to the vast heap of a Roman Empire.

65 posted on 03/16/2013 12:08:57 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I understand one is a senator and one is a congressman.
My point was one has some moxie and the ability to think and not capitulate. The other, not so much.


66 posted on 03/16/2013 3:13:05 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

I know, and the one with is in the minority house and the wimp is in charge of the majority one. We need to get this fixed before it’s too late. Too late is too late for our kids to not be completely pissed at ALL of us in about twenty years, when they’d be writing books not about the greatest generation but the __________ Generation that gave us this overwhelming mess that destroyed our lives. They wont’ know who Boehner, Cruz, Palin or Obama any more than most today know about FDR, Marshall even Patton and Ike.


67 posted on 03/16/2013 3:50:25 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
Why is Juan Boehner the “leader” of the Republicans instead of a man of integrity who has not been neutered? Someone like Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas)?

Because there are too many people - a lot of them here on FreeRepublic, who preach that the answer is to just elect people with an "R" after their name regardless of their inner convictions. Ultra-liberal, liberal, squishy moderate, sorta conservative, Tea Party, doesn't matter to them. The only qualification is that they have an "R" after their name.

THAT is how we get the likes of Boehner as head of the House. Indiscriminately vote for the "R", and the statists - be they DemocRATs or Karl Rove types - will make damn sure that the people that get in will keep the gravy train rolling.

Instead, you should be discriminating, and let Karl Rove know that you refuse to support his candidates, even though they have that "R" after their name. Things will eventually change, because you are starving the GOP-e beast.

"But, but, we won't have a country left if we don't vote for the "R"!!!! That's the GOP-e argument, and it's given us McCain and Romney. Will it work in 2016 with your GOP-e picked Jeb Bush? Will it work in 2014 for your Karl Rove-picked Congressman? Senator? It's up to you.

68 posted on 03/16/2013 4:05:42 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Digger
You can link every problem this country has back to these idiots in DC, every damn one of them.

I for one will never vote for any party, person or platform that does not stand on Constitutional ground.

When the time comes if I am still drawing a breath, I am "all in" to arrest these clowns, (and everyone of them stands as traitors by their actions, to this country, bar none.)

69 posted on 03/16/2013 10:56:49 PM PDT by SERE_DOC ( “The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” TJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot

Right-O.

Turn out the lights and slam the door on this malodorous, leftist mess that should be known by it’s own ‘fruits’: The Central Socialist Government.

Pass the torches, pitchforks and ‘sporting weapons.’


70 posted on 03/17/2013 5:10:31 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
That way, open procedure on C-SPAN, the public get to witness what they (our betters in Congress) consider absolute essential governance and their priority list.

Added benefit.

71 posted on 03/17/2013 5:27:24 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I have slept on this and it occurred to me that there are several ways to skin a cat, even one of those ubiquitous, very pampered, and much photographed cats we see on Free Republic.

1. Half the states have rejected the exchanges from which insurance must be purchased. The Federal government must set them up, find the space and the people.
2. All the above must be financed by congressional appropriations.
3. If some or most of the money required is not available, the effort will die.

Rather than kill, an impossible course already tried, force the abomination to wither on the vine. The in extremis misery will produce all kinds of headaches and pain. The misery and failure will produce loud calls for repeal


72 posted on 03/17/2013 5:36:39 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Well, where would you have us form up?

The steps of the Capital would be nice .....

73 posted on 03/17/2013 5:42:37 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Let’s do it.

I think first we should have an organization behind whose banner we would assemble first in the various states.

Tea Party or Oath Keepers would be nice.

Tell those assembled that the occupant of the White Hut is a monster created by Dr. Soros and many Igors and composed of many different body parts found in the graves of those who are still voting Democrat.

Light the torches. Brandish the pitchforks and advance as though the future of America depended on us.


74 posted on 03/17/2013 5:55:44 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: bert
This would work, excepting for one slight catch:

Republicrats can be such political weasels. They have grown to love a large government. The larger it is the less their incompetence appears.

75 posted on 03/17/2013 5:57:57 AM PDT by IbJensen (Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

I’m well aware of what happened to Allen down here. I worked his campaign...as much as I could. Losing wasn’t as much because of jerrymandering, although it didn’t help, but voter fraud and poll corruption, IMHO.


76 posted on 03/17/2013 6:09:13 AM PDT by Bushbacker1 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1

Yep, if it is close they will steal it.

Commie Dem Criminals


77 posted on 03/17/2013 6:28:19 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

All in the House have voted to repeal Obamacare. In this instance, Republicans do not support larger government


78 posted on 03/17/2013 6:34:17 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson