Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paedophilia is an Illness NOT a Crime, says Cardinal Just Days after Papal Conclave
Dialy Mail (U.K.) ^ | 16 March 2013 | Anna Edwards

Posted on 03/16/2013 7:44:17 AM PDT by DogByte6RER

Vatican Pope

(Cardinal Napier, third from left)

Paedophilia is an illness NOT a crime, says cardinal just days after papal conclave

• Claimed people abused as youngsters who then become paedophiles 'not criminally responsible'

• Says paedophilia 'is an illness, not a criminal condition'

• Says those people do not deserve to be punished because they are damaged

• Pope Francis said that he wants a 'church for the poor'

A South African cardinal who helped elect Pope Francis has described paedophilia as a psychological illness and not 'a criminal condition'.

The Catholic Archbishop of Durban, Wilfrid Fox Napier, told BBC Radio 5 live that people who were abused as children and became paedophiles were not criminally responsible for their actions in the same way as somebody 'who chooses to do something like that'.

Cardinal Napier, who was among the 115 cardinals in the conclave at the Vatican that elected Pope Francis earlier this week, called paedophilia a 'psychological disorder.

And just three days into the new role, the pope and the Catholic Church are now faced with fresh child abuse controversy after the cardinal's remarks.

He said: 'What do you do with disorders? You have got to try and put them right.

'If I as a normal being choose to break the law knowing that I am breaking the law, then I think I need to be punished...

'From my experience paedophilia is actually an illness, it is not a criminal condition, it is an illness.'

The cardinal spoke of two priests he knew who were abused as children and went on to become paedophiles.

He told the BBC: 'Don't tell me that those people are criminally responsible like somebody who chooses to do something like that.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: argentina; catholicism; childabuse; conclave; freewill; homosexualagenda; paedophilia; pedoophiles; pedophilia; popefrancis; romancatholicism; sexoffenders; southafrica; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Bulwyf

With all due respect one could argue there are other Christian denominations that blatently accept homosexuality and “gay marriage” which is strongly rebuked in the Bible as an abomination. As Christians we should unite forces against evil not attack each other which btw the devil loves.


41 posted on 03/16/2013 8:53:16 AM PDT by Scarlet7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict
By his thinking, no one is guilty of anything.

We haven't heard his thoughts on drilling for oil, or on making a lot of money.

42 posted on 03/16/2013 8:54:17 AM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

IF it’s ‘anti-Catholic’ to call out the disease that is infecting the Church what is NOT calling it out? I AM a Roman Catholic-and homosexuality has NO place in the Church except as an abomination. There can be NO reason for a priest to excuse and protect a practicing homosexual/pedophile unless that priest identifies in some way with the lifestyle and thinks it is more important to protect and defend the crime than his vows or the Church teachings. You do not defend something if you are not OF it. Would taking a whip to the Vatican and driving out homosexual clergy be ‘Catholic bashing’? Jesus cleaned the temple that way- we need it done again.


43 posted on 03/16/2013 8:58:25 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky (When anyone says its not about Islam...it's about Islam. That death cult must be eradicated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I'm willing to meet him half way here: The desires of paedophilia are an illness. Acting on those desires is a crime.

I remember having a similar argument with a professor in a college psychology class. He stated that pedophilia (like most sexual urges) is irresistible. I argued that it was resistible and that psychologists and psychiatrists suffered from a bias because of the (rightful) disgust pedophilia is seen, that very few pedophiles go for treatment because of resisted urges. Instead only those who have been criminally caught are medically treated. Thus since psychologists only see those who did not resist they assume that no one can resist. Neither one of us convinced the other, but hopefully some of my classmates reconsidered their blindly nodding approval of the professor.

44 posted on 03/16/2013 8:58:46 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Choose one: the yellow and black flag of the Tea Party or the white flag of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

He is WRONG (using my Marisa Tomei voice)......as mom used to say, you might not be able to stop a bird from flying over your head but you can stop it from building a nest on it!


45 posted on 03/16/2013 8:59:12 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict; ClearBlueSky; muawiyah; Vaquero
"By his thinking, no one is guilty of anything. We are all shaped by our environment and genetics, but unless one is truly mentally ill, we also have a free will."

What you said is exactly right, FR_addict. Everybody has an inborn inclination to do one sort of evil or another; that's called "concupiscence," as this Cardinal Napier should know, and it is an innate feature of our fallen human nature.

We are all born ith these characer flaws, and it is our responsibility --- with the grace of God --- to overcome them.

If one accepted Cardinal Napier's account of human action, one would have to say nobody is responsible for anything, because we are neither responsible for our genetic inheritance nor our early childhood development and environment.

It was wrong for Napier to say this. It was in violaion of what the Catholic Church teaches about human freedom and responsibility. I shows a failure to protect children from the predations of others.

And it was just plain stupid.

46 posted on 03/16/2013 9:00:12 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("You can observe a lot just by watchin' ." - Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Scarlet7

Bible is clear on homosexuality being an abomination to God. I do believe many people in the catholic church are Christians, but the church itself is not. Too many church teachings are in direct violation of God’s word. Time will tell. I know Jesus commands me to love my neighbor, I do admit I struggle with that and maybe I come across poorly but that’s not my intent. I do care about people and hope and pray many eyes are opened.


47 posted on 03/16/2013 9:02:22 AM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Well how bout this one that happened in Syracuse, NY. A child molester carjacked an auto with mother and her 10 year old daughter. Kills the mother and rapes the 10 year old. Just sick.


48 posted on 03/16/2013 9:02:39 AM PDT by Bruce Kurtz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

And if you do not want to be suspected of perversion yourself do not defend or excuse perversion. Defend it or excuse it- be identified with/by it.


49 posted on 03/16/2013 9:04:14 AM PDT by ClearBlueSky (When anyone says its not about Islam...it's about Islam. That death cult must be eradicated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
'From my experience'

A confession?

50 posted on 03/16/2013 9:07:23 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

As a practicing Catholic I was taught to focus on the sin and not so much on the sinner. If the Cardinal does not believe paedophilia is a sin he shouldn’t represent the Church. Let us pray on that.


51 posted on 03/16/2013 9:14:31 AM PDT by Scarlet7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Good for you! Did you pass the class?


52 posted on 03/16/2013 9:16:52 AM PDT by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: cradle of freedom
which detailed how homosexuals took over certain seminaries. These seminaries became a good hideout for homosexuals who flaunted their sexual proclivities out in the open. Real devout men were pushed out of the seminaries.

This is the problem. The church invited all these homosexuals in as clergy and a good number of them began raping little boys. It wasn't shocking to much of the Church clergy because of the high number of priests participating in deviant behavior with one another.

I remember a coworker of mine many years ago told me that he had joined Catholic seminary to become a priest. He didn't last very long. He told me it become clear that a lot of the people there were homosexuals, and he was given council that he should leave and go find a girlfriend. He simply didn't fit in with the culture.

Perhaps the one good thing, if such a thing can be said, about homosexuality becoming so mainstream in society is that fewer of them will seek refuge in the Catholic church as clergy. I really do hope the church is now booting these people out as soon as they are discovered and not allowing them to go on to become priests.

53 posted on 03/16/2013 9:18:56 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf
Cardinal Napier's statement wasn't an expression of Catholic doctrine OR policy. It was in violation of what the Catholic Church teaches about human freedom and responsibility, and shows either ignorance of, or disregard for, morality as defined by Divine and Naural Law.

It shows a culpable failure to protect children from the predations of others.

Please do not generalize from the asinine Napier to the whole Catholic Church, when he is in fact trashing its teachings.

54 posted on 03/16/2013 9:19:44 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("You can observe a lot just by watchin' ." - Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
'From my experience paedophilia is actually an illness, it is not a criminal condition, it is an illness.'

He is making the mistake of accepting the secular humanist abstract conceptual framework and language. This is a victory for atheism, and more instances of this will lead to the destruction of Christianity. Secular humanists blame the environment for human evil, and they believe that if the environment could be perfected by means of secular humanist principles and secular humanist education, then mankind could learn to consistently to choose what is morally correct.And, punishment is unnecessary, since misdeeds are simply caused by an imperfect environment.What is needed is restorative justice rather than the Biblical idea of justice where people get what they deserve.

55 posted on 03/16/2013 9:22:27 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Uh ... sorry, Cardinal ... it’s BOTH!


56 posted on 03/16/2013 9:25:12 AM PDT by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Good for you! Did you pass the class?

Yeah. He wasn't vindictive, merely dismissive.

57 posted on 03/16/2013 9:30:08 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Choose one: the yellow and black flag of the Tea Party or the white flag of the Republican Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: All; flaglady47; mickie
What gets me is that Cardinal Napier has to shoot his mouth off just when it's a period that Pope Francis should be in the spotlight.

Talk about a viper in His Holiness' bosom. The Cardinal either has a tin ear as to what's going on around him.....or he's an extreme egotist taking advantage of the the temporary world-wide audience engendered by the Conclave to make a statement sure to be seized upon by Catholic-bashers everywhere....and applauded by religious progressives.

The Cardinal should be made to do penance, not alone for the subject matter of his statement, but for the asinity and self-aggrandizement of opening his trap at the wrong time and in the wrong place.

Leni

58 posted on 03/16/2013 9:31:29 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Good. With tenure that’s the best we can hope for.

You done good, perhaps some of those other heads full of mush were jolted out of blindly accepting everything the professor says as gospel, well, better than Gospel...


59 posted on 03/16/2013 9:35:03 AM PDT by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

What you say fits right in to what Michael Rose describes in his book—the real Catholics were booted out of the seminaries.


60 posted on 03/16/2013 9:50:30 AM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson