Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark

Conspiracy theories don’t need “evidence”


2 posted on 04/24/2013 4:14:39 PM PDT by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FewsOrange

Absence of evidence is evidence of the proof of the crime itself. They’re that good. Just ask.


75 posted on 04/24/2013 5:30:46 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: FewsOrange

Isn’t Beck the one who made fun of Sheriff Joe and those who questioned the eligibility of the current pResident who has spent millions to cover up his past?


81 posted on 04/24/2013 5:40:12 PM PDT by tsowellfan (www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: FewsOrange
For people who read and listen carefully, this CS Monitor article belongs to a familiar genre: the "nothing to see here" article that masquerades as objective fact-checking while simultaneously either negligently or intentionally misstating the relevant facts.

I don't personally know whether what Glen has been saying is true, or whether what Bret has been saying is true, or both, or neither. (The words of both men could be true at the same time, if Bret's sources are just part of a cover-up. After all, Bret does not re-state and personally stand behind his sources' claims as Glen does, Bret only reports the claims of his sources--though he does say the sources are believed to be credible.)

What I do know is that this article, and apparently this CS Monitor reporter, cannot be trusted. The reporter either does not know what Glen has actually said (and when), and what Bret actually said, and is just writing what he was told to write, or he is intentionally getting the facts wrong. Both what Glen has been saying and what Bret said in his video blog are falsely represented and seriously mischaracterized in the article.

Don't take my word for it. Watch or read what Glen has said. Watch Bret's video blog. Read the CS Monitor article. You can see it for yourself. It is not that hard.

100 posted on 04/24/2013 8:26:51 PM PDT by Joachim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: FewsOrange

Oh, scary “quotation marks”, that does it for me. And well, if Bret Baier says it, it must be true. Er, what percentage of Fox News does that Saudi Prince own again? Just wondering.


118 posted on 04/25/2013 7:52:56 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (.Are they stupid, malicious or evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson