I don’t really care whether he was armed or not. I have no simpathy for the Joke-ar. But that doesn’t negate the very real possibility that the cops just opened fire and the only “gunfight” was a bunch of scared, amped up idiots blasting away in a circle.
I don’t totally buy all aspects of the official story about the Boston explosions. Here’s what I think the reality may be ...
The older brother conspired with some sort of double agent(s) tasked to uncover networks in the Chechen diaspora as they might relate back to Russia. Somehow AQ operatives found out about this and double-crossed the shadowers, gave the older brother real working explosives which he set off.
The younger brother may not have been in on the plot, and he may not have laid down a bomb. The second bomb might have been placed by the AQ operatives who then melted away. The Saudi national who was deported may be involved, either as a Saudi government intel officer, or as a double agent.
The younger brother may have realized what had happened during the day following the explosions when their pictures began to appear. He may have decided not to turn in his brother, or perhaps was coerced into going along. He was therefore partly held hostage when the events of Thursday night began. He was in way over his head but reacting on instinct, managed to escape and was wounded in the exchange of fire.
A further wrinkle may be that authorities had some idea where he was, but wanted him as dead as his brother so that no messy trials or investigations would become necessary.
So they decided to wait a day or two, knowing he had crawled into the back yard boat (tracking dogs may have indicated this). The federals would have been more inclined to achieve this clean end result than the local cops. But the homeowner did the unexpected and checked the boat, at which point they had to move in.
Now they are stuck with the guy and his potentially damaging story. The mother is probably wrong about the older son but could be right about the younger one.
There are other doubts on a deeper level which are bound to emerge as alternate theories of the Boston events. We should adopt the Reagan doctrine of trust but verify, except perhaps more like distrust and verify.
I’ve even heard ideas about this being a staged false flag with actors and staged events. Not too keen on that level of conspiracy, more like a bungled intel operation previous to the event combined with an unsuspected link of the older brother to actual bad guys as well as to the case managers.
This may even have something to do with Obama’s mysterious indebtedness to the governments of certain foreign countries already mentioned above. What do you think?
I have no simpathy for him either, but how did the cops know he was the guy they were looking for? Or did they just assume the person in the boat was one of the bombers and opened fire?