Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Internet sales tax embraced by no-tax Republicans (in Senate)
yahoo news ^ | 4/25/2013 | STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

Posted on 04/25/2013 5:55:21 AM PDT by sickoflibs

WASHINGTON (AP) — You don't see this very often: a majority of Senate Republicans voting to make people who buy stuff on the Internet pay state and local sales taxes.

The Senate could vote as early as Thursday on a bill to empower states to require online retailers to collect state and local sales taxes for purchases made over the Internet. Under the bill, the sales taxes would be sent to the states where a shopper lives.

On Wednesday, the bill passed a test vote in the Senate, 74 to 23, with 27 Republicans voting in favor. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., vowed to pass the bill this week, before senators leave for a scheduled vacation.

"This is a matter of equity and fairness," said South Dakota Gov. Dennis Daugaard, a Republican. "The same people who are selling the same products should be paying the same taxes."

Under current law, states can only require stores to collect sales taxes if the store has a physical presence in the state. As a result, many online sales are essentially tax-free, giving Internet retailers an advantage over brick-and-mortar stores.

It is part of GOP orthodoxy to oppose higher taxes, a central issue that divides Democrats and Republicans. That's why the bill faces an uncertain fate in the House, where some Republicans regard it as a tax increase.

But supporters of the bill insist it is not a tax increase. Instead, they say, the bill merely provides states with a mechanism to enforce current taxes.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: internet; internetsalestax; internettax; salestax; stupidparty; taxes; taxistax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-172 next last
To: CitizenUSA

OK, that’s a one-time tax called a “use tax” which is just a way of them collecting sales tax on something not purchased in their state. A more accurate description of that tax would be “excise tax.”

The use taxes I’m referring to are paid *every year* that the property is used in business.


101 posted on 04/25/2013 8:48:52 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

I understand. I paid use taxes (as a business) when I’d use merchandise rather than sell it. I also pay use taxes (as a consumer) when I buy something out of state and bring it into the state for my use. Commercial or non-commercial use doesn’t matter. The exception is for businesses that buy products out of state for resale in state. In that case, use taxes don’t apply, because the state collects sales tax on those transactions.


102 posted on 04/25/2013 9:06:34 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: BCW

The tax party indeed.


103 posted on 04/25/2013 9:11:14 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

NO, businesses do not support this bill and they are NOT losing sales to the internet.

Absolutely nothing stops any brick and mortar store from selling on the internet. I do.

Pretending this is about fairness is crap. Business owners too stupid or lazy to figure out how to sell on the internet are now whining that somebody stole their cheese. It’s BS, what they are really demanding is protection from competition.

The worst part of this bill is that it makes many small businesses liable for sales tax collection in states that they have no physical presence in (unlike the big box stores who all have their own websites). This is about big business using the power of government to hamper smaller competitors.

Messing with the concept of nexus based on physical presence to establish legal jurisdiction enshrines taxation without representation and further erodes our freedom.

It’s a bad law that is stupidly written and creates a complex system while ignoring the simple fix that requires no federal legislation whatsoever.

States have always had the power to enact origin based sales tax and have their businesses charge sales tax on ALL sales whether physical or virtual, basically making internet shoppers virtual tourists who must pay the sales tax on purchases made in the state they are visiting.

It’s that simple. but politicians prefer a complicated system that asserts vastly more control while eroding a basic legal concept of jurisdiction based on physical presence.

So stop spreading the lie that it’s about fairness or that business wants this. Some do, but not for honest reasons.


104 posted on 04/25/2013 9:17:05 AM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

First of all, it *automatically files* sales taxes for 24 states.

It can tell you the sales tax rates for *all* states and localities. The ability to automatically file sales taxes might (and probably) depends on the online infrastructure of various states.

Now, as to the totality of their coverage: first, there are five states that have no retail sales tax, so there are only 21 states where they won’t be able to file the sales tax return for you.

The legislation, as it now stands in the Senate, doesn’t mandate the collection of sales tax for online sales from out-of-state vendors. It permits states to start requiring payment of sales taxes.

If a state wants to start collecting said taxes, they’re going to have to make it easy to pay taxes. Taxes that aren’t easy to pay don’t get paid.


105 posted on 04/25/2013 9:18:07 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
They are tired of losing sales to the Internet.

Then they need to re-examine their value proposition.

106 posted on 04/25/2013 9:18:23 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

How will the online taxes that are collected get funneled down to the local level?


107 posted on 04/25/2013 9:20:24 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke

Suppliers (wholesalers) and manufacturers do not collect sales taxes. They only sell to holders of resale certificates.

Sales taxes apply only to retail sales.


108 posted on 04/25/2013 9:22:49 AM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The same way the currently collected sales taxes do.


109 posted on 04/25/2013 9:26:10 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Correct.

And when I buy “wholesale” from a for-real wholesaler who doesn’t want to collect sales tax, I have to show my retail sales tax cert #, or go find a retailer who will do the collection of the sales tax.

There’s a plumbing supply place in town where I do a lot of business. They’ll sell to homeowners and DIY repair folks, but the actual sale of the parts has to go through a plumber. My plumbing shop calls over to the wholesaler, tells them I’m coming over, I pick up the part, the plumber bills me their wholesale price on the item, plus sales tax, and I do the plumbing.


110 posted on 04/25/2013 9:29:53 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Taxes, taxes, taxes. :)

That’s what it’s all about. :D


111 posted on 04/25/2013 9:30:39 AM PDT by Tzimisce (The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

States already have the power to do “origin” based sales tax. Federal legislation is not required for this idea.

State legislators don’t want to do this because of their local business lobbies, because they don’t want to be seen as responsible for enacting additional taxes and because high sales tax states like CA, NY and IL would be disadvantaged when shoppers flock and businesses relocate to states with lower sales tax rates.

This legislation is their cluster**** solution to their political problems. The states pass the buck to the Feds and the Feds claim its not a new tax, just a new enforcement method, plus these are state taxes so blame your state for the high sales tax rates.

I live in a non sales tax state by choice, but this law will force me at my own expense to become a tax collector for 45 states that I do not live in and cannot vote in while making me legally liable for any errors I might make and subject to their tax law, audits, fines and punishment.

It’s not enough that I am a tax slave to the Fedgov and the state I live in. I now get to be everybody’s tax b*tch.


112 posted on 04/25/2013 9:32:37 AM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Bender2

Keep in mind that Cornholio IS the Senate Minority Whip.

He really can herd them cats, can’t he?

Can’t wait to “retire” him during his next primary race. Ted Cruz needs a better pardner in the Senate.


113 posted on 04/25/2013 9:51:09 AM PDT by Howie66 (Molon Labe, Traitors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

this is the “Best Buy” tax.

Best Buy has out of date products, HORRIBLE service, terrible staff, scamming contracts, so to save themselves they want to eliminate competition.


114 posted on 04/25/2013 10:12:59 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

they will not.

People will just buy from overseas sources.

Bypass the USA entirely.


115 posted on 04/25/2013 10:15:03 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce; stephenjohnbanker; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; BillyBoy; ...

States cant create money to spend like the Fed can so they have to raise taxes instead.

This bill in effect raises taxes while leaving all parties: congress and same states denying that they raised taxes.
So they tax our Amazon making Walmarts happy to get $$$ to their campaigns and then they all (Congress and states) Mdeny they raised any of our taxes.

Its a perfect crime.

But if the GOP joins in this then they are traitors who only see $$$ as important.

McCain has obviously decided this is his last term in Senate and to stab us in the back on every issue that comes up.


116 posted on 04/25/2013 10:36:50 AM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro; AppyPappy; stephenjohnbanker; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; ...

” Democrats stare you in the face, tell you they are going to take more of your money, and then do it every chance they get.

Republicans stare you in the face, tell you they believe in lower taxes at the same time they are doing a reach-around to clean out your wallet.”

Politics in 2013.
Deadly accurate!

I think I will imitate Diogenes, grab a lamp, and walk the darkened streets, looking fo an honest REPUBLICAN.


117 posted on 04/25/2013 10:44:37 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Iron Munro; stillafreemind; Graybeard58; Arm_Bears; a fool in paradise; BCW; ...

” We are nothing to the (Senate) GOP. Between this and amnesty I am pretty close to writing them off completely, not that they care.”

Don’t forget the Drinker of the House.


118 posted on 04/25/2013 10:49:09 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Impy; AppyPappy; stephenjohnbanker; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy

” The masters $$$$ command both parties in the Senate with $$$, and they DEMAND amnesty workers and demand raising sales taxes on us and those online businesses, by being the tax collector for the states here.

Like i said, the GOP will fight tooth and nail against a Warren Buffet tax on themselves, but raising taxes on us the middle class who use the internet with credit cards is on the top of their lists. “

GOP = Got Our Perks

GOP = Got Our Pension

What’s in YOUR wallet?


119 posted on 04/25/2013 10:53:55 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

LMAO!


120 posted on 04/25/2013 11:00:52 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Democrats try to increase federal government spending for their favored constituents.

Republicans try to increase local government spending (including spending from federal funding) for their favored constituents (see teachers, social workers, planners, building inspectors, other regulations for NGOs, emergency/rescue, etc.).

Republicans tell us to vote for their candidates to avoid legislative attacks against our freedoms, but Republicans don’t repeal bad laws that were already passed.

Remember that, and see where politics will go in the future (more into the socialist toilet, until there’s no more production or money of value for anyone to spend).


121 posted on 04/25/2013 11:26:41 AM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; All

Both parties love internet sales tax bills.

Not a shock.

Obama will sign it Monday.


122 posted on 04/25/2013 11:27:22 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Find software engineering an interesting field, but outsourcing kept me from pursuing any technology career despite a passion for it.


123 posted on 04/25/2013 11:29:17 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bennowens
How can a revenue producing bill originate in the Senate?

Robert J. Dole started that in 1982 with one of the Reagan tax hikes, yes there were tax hikes under Reagan too.

124 posted on 04/25/2013 11:29:34 AM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bender2; l8pilot; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; ...
Thanks for that list.

Once again we find Linda voting against our best interests and Sen. Scott taking care of his constituents.

South Carolina Ping
Send FReepmail to join or leave this list.

Keep up with what our Congresscritters are doing. Sign up for the free MegaVote email service here.

125 posted on 04/25/2013 11:32:37 AM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

I am sure they can find a way to automatically calculate the taxes through databases when the customer enters their info on checkout.

Still, I don’t like the bill. Already have to pay shipping. Paying tax too really makes online shopping unattractive.


126 posted on 04/25/2013 11:32:38 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

The retailers will also have to pay for access to the databases.


127 posted on 04/25/2013 11:36:42 AM PDT by MortMan (Disarming the sheep only emboldens the wolves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; All; FReepers

Just a general comment.

This bill will eventually have to go to the House. Since it appears to be a lost cause in the Senate, the time to start bothering your House Rep about this is NOW, TODAY. And everyday until the House takes it up. Let’s start building the firewall now instead of waiting till the last minute.

To be most effective, hand write, no computer printer needed, a short, legible letter expressing your misgivings about this, put it in a hand addressed letter size, not business size, envelope and send it to your Rep’s local office. Mail sent to DC gets delayed due to scanning for anthrax and other bad guys, etc. Mail to local offices is not scanned, yet.


128 posted on 04/25/2013 11:42:47 AM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1; sickoflibs

“States already have the power to do “origin” based sales tax. Federal legislation is not required for this idea.”


Well, maybe states have the power, but they don’t do it. And what they *do* tax—transactions involving purchasers from their home states even if the transaction took place elsewhere—is something that my proposal would make illegal. So what would occur if Congress passed my proposal would be that states would begin to tax all transactions involving sellers in the state, even if the purchaser was from outside the state, since that no longer would be result in double taxation on purchasers from other states and since they no longer would be able to collect sales taxes on out-of-state purchses from their residents.

I know full well why states like NY and CA oppose such a change: they want to tax their residents who buy stuff out-of-state to avoid paying high sales taxes. Well, I think we can get this passed in the House even without any votes from CA or NY (there are only 21 Republicans from those states in Congress, and some of them would be willing to vote for the proposal).


129 posted on 04/25/2013 11:55:23 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

I got an email from Ebay asking to help lobby Congressrats against this.

$1million and under are exempt, but I’m sure that will be downgraded quickly till it’s $1 or under.


130 posted on 04/25/2013 12:11:24 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

We buy nothing we don’t absolutely need. Well except good red wine. :)


131 posted on 04/25/2013 12:37:30 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

Yes I had an online site for 3 years. It still going to be a pain in the azz. Plus it will up the cost of the online products. Its not going to be good. But of course neither is the cyber security bill they just passed.


132 posted on 04/25/2013 12:39:19 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Your proposal is “origin” based sales tax, that is what it is called in the think tanks and the corridors of power and it doesn’t need congressional approval. A state has the right to regulate the retailers in their state.

The reason no state has pursued origin based sale taxes is no one wants to be first because it will disadvantage their local etailers. So they have come up with this mutual we will all do it together simultaneously plan that requires federal permission because the states are essentially agreeing to give each other jurisdictional authority over each others businesses in regards to sales tax.

Origin based sales tax would create downward competitive pressure on sales tax rates because buyers and business would tend to gravitate toward lower or no tax states.

But if buyers are forced to pay their own states rate regardless of where they shop, then their is no incentive to shop for lower tax rates or for business to relocate to lower tax rate states. That’s why the state legislatures have come up with this skunk of a bill, a sort of mutual assured risk sharing come vote time.

It is business getting screwed here, because we are being made tax collectors for 45 states at our expense of time and money and are liable for audits and fines and punishment to states where we don’t reside and can’t vote.

Bastards!


133 posted on 04/25/2013 1:18:08 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Both parties are all in for crony capitalism. This is all about keeping the little people from starting businesses.


134 posted on 04/25/2013 1:24:01 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; Valpal1
RE :”“States already have the power to do “origin” based sales tax. Federal legislation is not required for this idea.”
....
Well, maybe states have the power, but they don’t do it.”

Except when I buy something at Amazon on my Chase card then Maryland has no record of that to use against me. ‘

I have read that CA brow beat Amazon into charging the tax for CA residents by threatening their other businesss interests,

135 posted on 04/25/2013 1:33:02 PM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I think you misunderstand how origin based sales tax works. Your state wouldn’t be regulating the citizens to pay the Use tax anymore. They would simply regulate businesses located in your state to collect sales taxes on all sales whether the buyer was physically present or on line.

If you bought from AZ you would be charged WA sales tax instead of no sales tax unless you were actually purchasing from an affiliate seller located in some other state and then you’d be paying that state sales tax.

You would probably start looking for sellers that live in one of the five states with no sales tax or one that was much lower... that is why states don’t want to go their.

It would cause huge demand to lower the sales tax to a lower rate in order for their retailers to be competitive with other states and then there goes the cash cow.

The MFA lets them keep their high rates and prevent you from avoiding the sales/use tax.


136 posted on 04/25/2013 1:44:10 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

We are where Europe is right now with both major parties looking for tax revenue to keep up the spending pipeline.

No talk from the supposedly conservative party of a quick balancing of the budget.

I hear the platitudes of Senator Pat “One Term” Toomey about trimming “fat” after he said last year he wants to balance the budget in ten years.

The crisis is here that demands real spending cuts, government agency (EPA, OSHA and more) total shutdowns and more to put the fiscal house in order.

The GOP plays to our resentments about items of wasteful spending without balancing the budget. Toomey played that game on the radio this morning and I’m not taking RINO bait anymore.

BALANCE THE BUDGET NOW.....


137 posted on 04/25/2013 1:45:10 PM PDT by Nextrush (A BALANCED BUDGET NOW AND PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN ARE MY DREAMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NVDave; AppyPappy

Then Wyoming needs to go after its own citizens who aren’t paying their use tax or get a state income tax.


138 posted on 04/25/2013 2:33:01 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Bingo and worse this will end of hurting Brick and Mortars. What is stopping their localities from raising taxes? The Internet.

Once that’s gone they’ll all raise taxes up. We’re ready to do just that right here in Illinois.


139 posted on 04/25/2013 2:35:50 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

It hurts federalism as well. We need states to compete on price. That price or cost of living in one state or another is partly a function of local, county and state taxes. This is a power grab by large, urban dominated states that are in a death spiral over “right to work” and low tax states.

Let them die or change.


140 posted on 04/25/2013 2:40:52 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: TurboZamboni

Yep, like the Income Tax was only for the top 1% of incomes...

Whoops, sorry folks. We need more money. Who would have guessed?


141 posted on 04/25/2013 2:43:17 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I would assume the money would go to the state and then it would be up to the state as to how those taxes get spent within the state.


142 posted on 04/25/2013 3:02:54 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Actually, businesses really support this bill. They are tired of losing sales to the Internet.

Firms Will Regret Deal With Devil On Internet Tax
Investor's Business Daily  | 24 April 2013 | Editorial

Government: Non-Internet businesses claim a looming, unprecedented collection of state sales taxes on their online competitors is not a new tax. They will regret their pact with the devil tax collector. The new Internet sales tax legislation currently being steamrolled through the Democratic-controlled Senate with White House support is not some kind of untax, a government revenue version of the Uncola.

It's not that "certain je ne sais quoi, fresh, clean, no aftertaste!" The National Retail Federation imaginatively claims "this is not a new tax" and claims that non-Internet stores "cannot compete on sales tax," and therefore "Congress needs to address this disparity." Calls to "tax the guy across the street," however, always come back to haunt the first guy. For some time, though, Amazon.com — obviously judging the tax as inevitable — has stood together with the non-Internet, pro-tax businesses; eBay, on the other hand, remains committed to "protect small online businesses, not potentially put them out of business" via new taxes.

This is not a new issue, and it's no surprise, considering the perennial greed that is second nature to government. In 1992 the Supreme Court, in its Quill decision, unanimously prevented North Dakota from audaciously collecting sales taxes from a company with no physical presence in the state but whose North Dakota customers used its software to place orders.


Full story source:

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/042313-653034-politicians-eager-to-collect-state-sales-taxes.htm

143 posted on 04/25/2013 3:13:13 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00107


144 posted on 04/25/2013 3:30:35 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

“They are tired of losing sales to the Internet.”

Then make your own Ebay or Amazon account? What’s the problem here?

I have lot of friends at the Fabric district who sell on both marketplaces as they have the initiative to realize you can ship to someone a hundred miles away instead of relying on walk in customers for your business.


145 posted on 04/25/2013 3:35:19 PM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company after the election, & laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I just need do a 180 on my ebay sales and purchases.
Rather than refuse to ship to overseas, maybe ONLY sell and ship to overseas.

F these bass turds.


146 posted on 04/25/2013 3:44:05 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Just how is a state supposed to “go after its (sic) own citizens who aren’t paying their use tax” without creating a complete police state?

Duh.

And no, we’re seeking to avoid any income tax. A sales tax is a better way in our “free trade” economy to spread the tax load. The thing that is most infuriating about income taxation now is that the GOP has pursued a “cut taxes” agenda to a point where a near majority of income earners pay zero tax. Everyone should pay something, and sales taxes are the best way to insure that no one escapes taxation.


147 posted on 04/25/2013 7:03:48 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

Hmm. Excellent point.


148 posted on 04/25/2013 7:09:09 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: All

This bill will have huge unintended consequences, i.e., creating more sales in other countries.

It’s just like the out-sourcing disaster. The more you tax and over-regulate, you more you drive business out of the U.S. Will they never learn?


149 posted on 04/25/2013 7:36:22 PM PDT by Liberty Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

You’re mixed up on this one. First, “its own” isn’t a grammar error, but is correct.

What Wyoming is dealing with is its own citizens rejecting its “low tax” system. It is an internal problem to Wyoming. It is not a nationwide problem. It is a Wyoming problem.

Here in Illinois we have a spending problem. Our government is socialist and crony capitalist. That is an Illinois problem. We don’t have a revenue problem, but a spending problem.

I cannot speak to Wyoming’s problems, but let Wyoming solve them. Instead you’re calling for more government and more invasiveness. The Senate bill undermines federalism. We need states to compete.

As has already been clearly stated in this thread:

1. Any brick and mortar store can gain an online presence.

2. Brick and Mortar stores are suffering from bad local/county/state tax and regulatory policies that make it expensive to do business in those locales.

3. America has a federal, not a national government. Federalism means states compete and pay for their good or bad decisions.

4. Liberty is undermined and reduced as federalism is undermined and reduced.

That’s it.

Let Wyoming fix its own problems. The truth is that Wyoming’s politicians don’t have the political will to go after your free-rider problem. So they’re asking America’s Senate and House to nationalize their problem.

It’s just another crony capitalist bailout. It won’t help either the Brick and Mortars to be more competitive or our individual liberty.

You’re thoughtful and I know how you feel, but if you came from Illinois you’d see the problem for what it really is.


150 posted on 04/26/2013 3:29:35 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson