Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No constitutional rights for terrorists
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 4-29-2013 | Ben Kinchlow

Posted on 04/29/2013 12:35:03 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

“Come to the U.S. and kill Americans! Even if you murder women and children, you will be guaranteed protection under our Constitution, ‘Mirandized’ and provided lawyers, along with top-quality medical care (if wounded in an escape attempt) … all at taxpayers’ expense. You could possibly even qualify for long-term quality care, with many free amenities, also at public expense, or perhaps, as an ‘enemy combatant,’ receive an all-expense-paid retirement on an island in the Caribbean.”

Full article here

============================================================

With the incessant liberal prattle all week about the "right" of their darling little Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to remain silent under Miranda after detonating his shrapnel-jam-packed pressure cooker at the Boston Marathon, liberals have succeeded in safely shifting the conversation away from the sheer magnitude of murderous barbarism displayed by a couple of imported terrorists, (or, as the New York Times would prefer, a coupla misunderstood little lads just trying to fit in).

Instead, liberals would rather talk hysterically about how Tsarnaev's inalienable "right" to lawyer-up is inviolable because blowing up the Boston Marathon packed with civilians is no where near meeting the definition of a war crime -- not compared to, say, cutting Head Start.

Would libbies show the same fetish for phony legalism had the attack been on an airport (or airliner?)

Who can forget the paralyzing madness, the chaos and mayhem at airports across the country, with madmen trying to 'send a message' by attacking the airlines, paralyzing air travel and inciting panic?

But enough about Hussein Obama's FAA sequester.

(Say, what is it about men with Arab-sounding names and their penchant for attacking air travel?)

Out of their profound concern for school children, Democrats had hoped for another Sandy Hook massacre to get their gun bans through Congress, but I'm sure they'd never fantasize about a fatal airline accident resulting from sequestration because we all know how much they'd hate to blame Republicans for it.

The nexus between the Boston Marathon bombing and the failed Sequester is known technically as: Pervasive liberal idiocy.

With warmonger Bush finally off the stage, making peace with the Islamic world should be a piece of cake, prophesied Obama back in campaign '08. Even the Iranians will adore us, provided we aggressively plant our lips firmly enough on Ahmadinejad's Islamic backside. Four-plus years of Iranian backside lip-planting later, the mullahs reward Obama graciously, piling up Shiite loads of more centrifuges, even as Obama keeps paddling vigorously up De Nile.

Four-plus years of Times Square bombings, military recruiting office shootings, underwear bombers and Fort Hood terrorist attacks (excuse me, outbursts of non-Islamic-related workplace violence) by the lone wolf boys, mostly from Jihadistan basket-cases, but Obama is wedded as ever to lead Detective Janet Napolitano's working theory it's the Tea party activists (pining for that 35% vs 39.6% upper tax bracket) who ought to worry you.

But it's a short, straight line from Napolitano's conspiracy theories, to Iran's mad imams, to the brothers Tsarnaev's mad imom, who helpfully revealed last week that it was all just a buncha cans of red (outdoor) paint, not blood, shipped in by the CIA chaps who offed Martin Luther King Jr., JFK, RFK, leveled WTC building 7 and brought you the "fake" moon landing.

But if imom Tsarnaev is completely bananas, "imam" Obama has a sporting chance of competing in the same league. Instead of red paint, he's opted for barrels and barrels of red ink, emptied all over the joint for four uninterrupted years, and counting, premised on stimulus theories that if you make government fat and costly enough, presto! You've got prosperity.

Stimulus after stimulus after stimulus, and all Obama has to show for after all the red ink dumping are stunted Econ growth rates and sequesters, just as all the copious lip-planting expeditions gave us the Boston Marathon bombing.

The best argument conservatives have against liberalism is the cartoonish Barack Obama.

Anyway, that's...
My Two Cents...
"JohnHuang2"


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/29/2013 12:35:03 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Forgiven_Sinner; xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ...

Monday-morning ping! Have a great week, y’all!


2 posted on 04/29/2013 12:36:40 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

bump!!

Hey stranger! How have you been?


3 posted on 04/29/2013 12:41:48 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

4 posted on 04/29/2013 12:52:01 AM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The best argument conservatives have against liberalism is the cartoonish Barack Obama.

And we should use that against the liberals in every campaign for the next 200 years.

5 posted on 04/29/2013 12:56:34 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

They’re not terrorists. they’re presidential sympathizers.


6 posted on 04/29/2013 1:04:05 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("The arrogant one will stumble and fall With no one to raise him up" Jeremiah 50:32)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

The best argument conservatives have against liberalism is the cartoonish Barack Obama.

And we should use that against the liberals in every campaign for the next 200 years.


Yes, but the idiots among us will never recognize him for the evil bastard he is. The useful idiots of today can’t see what damage he’s done so the useful idiots of tomorrow are of no use.


7 posted on 04/29/2013 1:40:46 AM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it. Their minds have been stolen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

This sumbitch placed one of his damned pressure cookers deliberately next to an eight year old child. If there was any justice in this world, they would make him sit on one and let it frikkin’ blow his worthless self to kingdom come.


8 posted on 04/29/2013 1:44:33 AM PDT by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

That bastich said at the w h corresondent’s dinner that he wasn’t the strapping young muslim socialist he used to be. He was right. Now he is an older, angrier, uglier muslim socialist who is losing it more and more every day. That makes him far more dangerous than people realize.


9 posted on 04/29/2013 1:54:06 AM PDT by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

That bastich said at the w h corresondent’s dinner that he wasn’t the strapping young muslim socialist he used to be. He was right. Now he is an older, angrier, uglier muslim socialist who is losing it more and more every day. That makes him far more dangerous than people realize.


You’re right. The evil bastard is one dangerous and evil demon who is going to go all out to destroy America in any and all ways he can.

He’s about to give REVENGE a new meaning.

His supporters had better wake up because they’re going to suffer as well.


10 posted on 04/29/2013 2:04:46 AM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it. Their minds have been stolen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
With the incessant liberal prattle all week about the "right" of their darling little Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to remain silent under Miranda after detonating his shrapnel-jam-packed pressure cooker at the Boston Marathon, liberals have succeeded in safely shifting the conversation away from the sheer magnitude of murderous barbarism displayed by a couple of imported terrorists, (or, as the New York Times would prefer, a coupla misunderstood little lads just trying to fit in).

Are liberals not behind the initiative to kill Americans with drones? Why are the leftists not consistent? Now they have Miranda rights? Or is all this an attempt to muddy the water?

Many articles about the terrorists seem to generate sympathy and "understanding." It is maddening!

11 posted on 04/29/2013 2:38:23 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

That is too easy, way too easy and way to fast.


12 posted on 04/29/2013 3:24:16 AM PDT by enduserindy (Conservative Dead Head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Thanks for the ping. As usual, another excellent essay


13 posted on 04/29/2013 3:30:55 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

What about people accused like the Hutaree. Some of them spent as much as two years in jail before being acquitted?


14 posted on 04/29/2013 3:32:55 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

15 posted on 04/29/2013 3:35:04 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olezip

I have not heard the name of the judge who inserted her/himself into the matter by going to the hospital to read him rights. The only rights I want to hear about are his last rights. But, what as the name of the judge?


16 posted on 04/29/2013 3:48:52 AM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

So Kinchlow he have a point in any of that or was he just filling printspace? He said we’re a nation of laws but he doesn’t want to see the laws applied to terrorists. OK, I understand that. But he is also dismissive of having them classified as enemy combatants and shipped to Gitmo. So in all of that did he indicate what he did want done with them?


17 posted on 04/29/2013 3:51:40 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Terrorists captured in this country should have Constitutional Rights until they are convicted. Remember, we have a Regime (including the popular media) that is trying make the Tea Party, veterans, etc., into “potential terrorists.” They need some protection.

Once they’re convicted of murder, though, “Constitutional Rights” should go out the window, esp. that pesky clause about “cruel and unusual punishment.”


18 posted on 04/29/2013 3:53:19 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
Terrorists captured in this country should have Constitutional Rights until they are convicted.

If they're American citizens.
19 posted on 04/29/2013 4:10:16 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

I’m just glad we all agree the Constitution means nothing. It’s refreshing.


20 posted on 04/29/2013 4:10:42 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

> This sumbitch placed one of his damned pressure cookers deliberately next to an eight year old child. If there was any justice in this world, they would make him sit on one and let it frikkin’ blow his worthless self to kingdom come.

That’s altogether too quick.
strap him down to a concrete slab, spread his legs apart and give the father of the murdered little girl a claw hammer and 15 minutes of privacy.


21 posted on 04/29/2013 4:26:46 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Gun Control is the Key to totalitarianism and genocide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

If you don’t want terrorists to have constitutional rights, don’t make them citizens.


22 posted on 04/29/2013 4:43:09 AM PDT by EricT. (Another Muslim terrorist. Who saw that coming?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EricT.
If you don’t want terrorists to have constitutional rights, don’t make them citizens.

Exactly.

We can talk about dealing with the symptoms or we can talk about a government that is intentionally creating problems that only they can fix by stripping Americans of rights.
23 posted on 04/29/2013 4:54:32 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Too many people think it could never happen to them, so they just don’t think period.

Just like everything else the meaning of “terrorist” would continually be redefined to include more and more people.

It would be no different than what they do to redefine a .22RF rifle to where it is defined as an assault rifle.


24 posted on 04/29/2013 5:18:57 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

The Hutaree arrest was based on nothing more than a bull session in the woods that was inspired by a federal informant. In fact if you’ve ever read the report, that bull session was tamer than things we regularly see posted here at FR.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3005940/posts

The feds accused them of plotting a simultaneous attack on police all across southeastern Michigan and northwestern Ohio. In the end they possessed no explosives and apparently never sought them or could be conned into buying any.


25 posted on 04/29/2013 5:32:57 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EricT.
If you don’t want terrorists to have constitutional rights,

Don't elect one president!

26 posted on 04/29/2013 5:46:29 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("The arrogant one will stumble and fall With no one to raise him up" Jeremiah 50:32)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: healy61

The transcript of the hearing, signed, sealed and delivered ... :-)
“Transcript: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s initial appearance”
https://www.facebook.com/GW.IFA/posts/608472839181370


27 posted on 04/29/2013 5:52:26 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Oh ... don’t worry ... we’ll all be back to supporting the US Constitution again, when it’s a subject we agree with ... LOL.


28 posted on 04/29/2013 5:54:21 AM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
A lot of people don't realize there are a lot of things you can buy from a grocery store, when combined together, will make what can now be described as a WMD, a chemical weapon or explosive.

People wouldn't have the slightest clue they have the makings for a WMD in their possession.

A terrorist could be anyone.

Just like with the Hutaree, they can target you at will.

29 posted on 04/29/2013 6:39:51 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

Al Qeada actually recommends match heads for a pressure cooker bomb. Its a very low speed explosion that builds up a great deal of pressure in a pressure vessel.


30 posted on 04/29/2013 6:42:09 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

It’s just that simple.

You have a pressure cooker and some matches, you are a terrorist in the process of assembling a bomb.

Some of these people better start thinking about what they want, they may not like what they get.


31 posted on 04/29/2013 7:49:01 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

You sound like one of those....

“Islamaphobic”, “racist”, “restrictionists, who merely think of themselves as conservatives”, “ bitter-enders who are still responding to radio talk-show hosts from eight years ago haven’t noticed that the world has shifted from underneath them,”

that Grover Norquist warned us about! [yes, sarcasm]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3012385/posts?page=13#13


32 posted on 04/29/2013 7:50:49 AM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Yes, let us give the government the power to not recognize the rights of anyone they deem a “terrorist” - what could POSSIBLY be wrong with that?/s

Is WND really THIS stupid?


33 posted on 04/29/2013 7:55:09 AM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

There’s one big problem with “no civil rights for terrorists”, and that is, as long as Obama, Jarrett, Napolitano and and Holder get to define who is and who is not a terrorist, all of us are skating on thin ice.

That’s MY 2 cents.


34 posted on 04/29/2013 7:58:47 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Neah. Still need to make sure they’re actually guilty and not scapegoats.
But the Chechen scumbag has confessed, so, in a sane world, the prosecution would call two witnesses ask “Did the accused say this?” then turn it over to the Defense - and the Judge should tell the Defense to keep it short - the jury doesn’t to work the whole day on this...


35 posted on 04/29/2013 10:07:24 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

One important thing to understand it that he wasn’t going to be denied rights. Miranda only means that he must be informed of his rights.

Kinda funny that in 1895 the supreme court ruled that jurors need not be informed of their rights but the later Miranda ruling says that the accused must be informed.

Frankly I think better education is the real answer to this conundrum.


36 posted on 04/29/2013 10:15:48 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

These days, I think you have to inform the suspect of his Miranda rights or everything he says prior to being informed of his right is inadmissible; in certain, circumstances, this can apparently be delayed up to 40 hours but that was news to me. So getting the defendant informed is important.

As for the jury, they should be informed that they sit in judgement on the law as well as on the defendant...


37 posted on 04/29/2013 10:34:32 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Dear FRiends,

Below, Anderson Cooper Interviews a very brave Boston Bombing victim Heather Abbott.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCt7ABe-_a8&feature=youtu.be

We can't help feel for this attractive and very well turned out victim as she comes out of surgery to tell her brave story of survival.

However, a quick search of Hollywood actors and actresses who are available to perform in TV, movies etc, we find a professional actress advertising her trade. She's not the only crisis actor we found advertising their skills on Hollywood Amputees. Look at Heather's professional bio. below

http://www.amputeesinhollywood.com/Videos.html

The truth is a valuable commodity that our government is using to deceive us. Why are they boosting the terror in Boston through the use of actors & actresses? They don't seem to be trying to hide their involvement very well, might be a more important question?

Stay Safe,

Michael 

38 posted on 04/29/2013 1:57:06 PM PDT by STD (One day closer to street justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: STD

Why don’t you update your FReeper home page with your latest news bulletin and provide a simple reference to it instead of repeating the same paragraphs of text over and over in various threads?


39 posted on 04/29/2013 2:01:56 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson