Posted on 05/06/2013 1:41:14 PM PDT by smoothsailing
He’s a democrat...no he won’t.
Perhaps during the attack on the consulate, the people in Washington in the administration dealing with the situation said, “This attack could endanger the re-election of President Obama (and our jobs). Chris will understand what is really at stake here. He would be willing to give up his life under this circumstance for a greater good, just as we would” - as they sat there in comfort and safety and watched the monitors flicker for a while longer.
Must make a note to self to start taping Hardball again. Chris Matthews is gonna have a stroke on live TV..
D’ain’t no way that this sock-puppet, nor his very overweight wife, nor his puppet handlers are going to be run out of our White House. In fact, there might not even be another election.
All this is is wishful thinking . . . d’ain’t gona’ happen no way.
Has Huckleberry ever been right... about anything?Huckabee is one of the staunchest defenders of life that we have in America today. So I'd say he's right 3,000 (give or take) times every day.
I think if a doctor knowingly took the life of an unborn child for money, and that's why he was doing it, yeah, I think you would, you would find some way to sanction that doctor. I don't know that you'd put him in prison, but there's something to me untoward about a person who has committed himself to healing people and to making people alive who would take money to take an innocent life and to make that life dead. There's something that just doesn't ring true about the purpose of medical practice when the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is "First, do no harm." Well, if you take the life and suction out the pieces of an unborn child for no reason than its inconvenience to the mother, I don't think you've lived up to your Hippocratic Oath of doing no harm. --Mike Huckabee, interview with Tim Russert, 12-30-07
Stupid.
Wait, What?
Huckabee said that?
Never mind.
Which would require me to live somewhere near a filty city, or even in plain view of a road.
I agree with Huckleberry on this one—this scandal or another will topple him from power-—He will be exposed for what he is.
I would impeach him just for his remarks in Mexico about our having “imposed our sovereignty” on Mexico.
You misunderstand - this issue was much bigger than he was/is - and he simply got in front of the wave. Did he first say”Aug 1?” Maybe, but it was the issue, not Huck’s “immense popularity and clout” that drove it.
A good amount of Red State Dems are up in 2014. The numbers favor the GOP, the Dems have to defend more seats and they have opened up more seats by retirement.
There are a few folks saying this - some guy from PJ Media said it back in the fall....so we’ll see. A drip drip drip sometimes becomes big, and sometimes not....
So it is remotely possible that Harry may have to decide if he likes being Majority Leader more than he like Obama...
The entire administration needs to be impeached, not just that arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave
...with a little luck, he’ll be minority leader and it won’t make any difference what he does......
Somewhere between Tuesday and Thursday, Team Obama will need a big distraction away from the Benghazi Witnesses.
Wonder what it will be?
That is how he plays the game. Especially when the media is realizing that 90% of the sheeple won’t fall for them repeating admin lies only, this time. Even the low info voters are suspicious about Benghazi and Know what it is now.
What the heck will they think up this time? Their deep thinkers came up with that video... They aren’t as bright as they think they are.
Yeah, and my wife is finally going to allow a hot 30 yo nympho move in with us...........
For once, let Huckabee be correct.
Well, it's about damn time!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.