Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz Seeks to Ban Illegal Immigrants in U.S. from Citizenship
US News and World Report ^ | MAy 8, 2013 | Rebekah Metzler

Posted on 05/08/2013 10:53:54 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, a newly elected Republican with a penchant for making headlines, filed an amendment that would bar undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States from ever earning citizenship.

There are an estimated 11 million people living in the country illegally, and a bipartisan immigration reform measure would create a pathway to citizenship over the course of 13 years by requiring those people to pay penalties and back taxes, as well as learn English. Conservatives opposed to reform decry the path as amnesty, but Democrats say they will not support reform that does not cope with the immigrants already living in the U.S.

Cruz also filed amendments that he says would "strengthen border security measures; reform the high-skilled temporary worker program; modernize, streamline and expand legal immigration; and prohibit federal, state or local entitlement benefits for those here illegally."(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; cruz; homosexualagenda; illegalaiens; illegalimmigration; immigration; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last
To: Regulator

We shouldn’t be legalizing illegals—period.

Even Marco Amnesty Rubio however has now noted that this monster of a bill can’t get passed without pulling back just a tad. Cruz’s proposal is a possible pull-back solution to try to get the monster through.


81 posted on 05/08/2013 5:25:25 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

I agree—send them home.

But I’m in shock. I’ve found an article by David Frum that makes me believe that I agree with him more than Palin or Cruz on an issue:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/05/06/david-frum-a-nonsense-consensus-on-immigration.html


82 posted on 05/08/2013 5:27:36 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

Cruz isn’t looking to enforce existing laws—he’s looking to legalize 30 million invaders who are here illegally.


83 posted on 05/08/2013 5:40:23 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes sir. He’s actually representing the people who voted for him.


84 posted on 05/08/2013 6:11:07 PM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Here's the problem: Assuming these 11 million CRIMINAL ENTRANTS to our Country can never become citizens - you know damn' well that the Democrat Party will do everything in their power to make sure they vote!

Can't have those "voter id" laws stopping CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS from participating in our democratic process now can we?

(/sarc)

85 posted on 05/08/2013 6:17:57 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Here's the problem: Assuming these 11 million CRIMINAL ENTRANTS to our Country can never become citizens - you know damn' well that the Democrat Party will do everything in their power to make sure they vote!

Can't have those "voter id" laws stopping CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS from participating in our democratic process now can we?

(/sarc)

86 posted on 05/08/2013 6:17:57 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.


87 posted on 05/08/2013 6:44:41 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Absolutely.


88 posted on 05/08/2013 9:29:09 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt
we desperately need someone in there that knows how to introduce the liberals AND Rinos to Tony Llama.

Now...that's funny!


89 posted on 05/08/2013 9:37:49 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 0.E.O
A person in the U.S., be they citizen or foreigner, are subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S.

Not so. They cannot be drafted into military service etc. They do not have ANY of the responsibilities of a citizen. They are in the country but not part of the country.

Exactly the same as consulate personnel. they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the US.

90 posted on 05/09/2013 6:45:26 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: John O
Not so. They cannot be drafted into military service etc. They do not have ANY of the responsibilities of a citizen. They are in the country but not part of the country.

But they are subject to our laws and our jusrisdiction. They cannot be drafted because the law says they cannot. But if they rob or steal or kill then they can be arrested and tried and jailed if convicted.

Exactly the same as consulate personnel. they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the US.

Diplomats are not subject to the jurisdiction because our laws give them immunity. The 'subject to the jurisdiction' clause was inserted to exclude people like foreign diplomats or visiting heads of state who enjoy immunity from our laws and who, should they or their spouse give birth while here, do not have a child who is a U.S. citizen.

91 posted on 05/09/2013 6:59:23 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Sam Clements

Whatever happened to ‘no taxation without representation?’ If they are paying taxes, they will get the vote.


92 posted on 05/09/2013 8:21:24 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Cubs Fan
The Republicans should propose a bill that grants the illegally aliens already here amnesty, but they will NEVER HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE.

Pass this and the Democrats will drop the issue like a hot rock.

93 posted on 05/09/2013 11:53:15 AM PDT by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

There are plenty of legal non citizens who work in the USA or any other country, for that matter, and therefore have to pay taxes. This doesn’t make them citizens nor give them any expectations of being able to vote. If this somehow becomes one of the conditions for immigration reform and for coming out of the shadows without the threat of deportation, so be it. I don’t understand the problem. This whole concept, if this is what Ted Cruz is talking about, may be the solution to the whole issue.


94 posted on 05/09/2013 1:58:08 PM PDT by Sam Clements
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Sam Clements

They aren’t excluded from becoming citizens. They can, if they choose, become American citizens. That’s the whole point.

If someone is here illegally they need to be deported. Letting them stay but not letting them become citizens isn’t going to work.


95 posted on 05/09/2013 2:59:57 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Here is the way it is. Eleven million people are NOT going to be deported. I can see a solution where these people can be alowed to stay because we aren’t going to send them home anyway. They do NOT need to be granted citizenship or allowed to vote. Why should they? As non citizens they also should NOT be allowed to collect any form of welfare including Obamacare. Why should they? If they do work they need to pay taxes just like everyone else. If they need help then there is family and private charity and also the option of going back home where their actual government could help. The American taxpayers can not shoulder the responsibility for every person in the world. In the future, the new immigration policies can never allow illegal aliens to pile up here again. These illegals came here to work or to be around family. They didn’t come here to become citizens or to vote and they shouldn’t be given those priviledges especially since their first act on American soil was to break our laws and violate our sovereignty.


96 posted on 05/09/2013 4:59:52 PM PDT by Sam Clements
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Sam Clements

“I can see a solution where these people can be alowed to stay because we aren’t going to send them home anyway.”

Then they are going to be able to vote.

“They do NOT need to be granted citizenship or allowed to vote.”

Yes, they can and they should. If we are allowing them to stay, live here, work and pay taxes, then they will have representation in Congress. No taxation without representation.

“Why should they?”

Because they pay taxes to the US and they have residency here in the US.

“As non citizens they also should NOT be allowed to collect any form of welfare including Obamacare.”

Again - if they are here and we make them legal, yes, they will have access to all of these things.

“If they do work they need to pay taxes just like everyone else.”

If they are paying taxes, then they ought to receive benefits from those same taxes.

“option of going back home where their actual government could help.”

This is their home. Once we let them in and make them legal - America is their home.

“The American taxpayers can not shoulder the responsibility for every person in the world.”

This is why welfare should be eliminated.

“In the future, the new immigration policies can never allow illegal aliens to pile up here again.”

So why are you repeating the same mistake as before? Deport them.

“They didn’t come here to become citizens or to vote”

Says who? You?

“they shouldn’t be given those priviledges especially since their first act on American soil was to break our laws and violate our sovereignty.”

If they are being granted Amnesty because the state is hungry for revenue, then this no longer matters.

The solution is simple. If found to be here illegally - deport them. Sure you might not get them all but you will get some.


97 posted on 05/10/2013 7:07:30 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Again and for the last time, deportation of 11 million people is not going to happen. It is silly to hang onto this idea because it is not going to happen. If they decide to stay, they do NOT have to be declared citizens or allowed to vote if the bill does not grant these priviledges. There are plenty of non citizen aliens in the USA and most other advanced countries in the world. The mere fact that they choose to live in a foreign country does not give them citizenship or the right to vote, or receive welfare payments period. Cruz’s suggestion that a path to citizenship be stripped from immigration reform is sensible and doable.


98 posted on 05/10/2013 11:51:19 AM PDT by Sam Clements
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Sam Clements

“If they decide to stay, they do NOT have to be declared citizens or allowed to vote if the bill does not grant these priviledges.”

If they become legal, then yes, they will get all these things.

“There are plenty of non citizen aliens in the USA and most other advanced countries in the world”

And they all have the ability to become citizens of their respective resident nations. This is no different. If they become legal they will gain this ability.

“The mere fact that they choose to live in a foreign country does not give them citizenship or the right to vote, or receive welfare payments period”

Over a period of time - they will have the ability to apply for these things. Again - if they are legal they will gain all of these things. Having a separate ‘class’ is unconstitutional via the 13th. Which - will apply to them once they are legal, all the legal protections available to Americans.

There are deep and significant ramifications to legalization.


99 posted on 05/10/2013 1:28:20 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson