Posted on 05/29/2013 11:43:27 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
Many pundits are weighing in on the decision by the Boy Scouts of America to allow open homosexuality into the organization. I, for one, am not surprised. The very fact that the leadership organized a vote on the question instead of simply standing firm on its existing policy, which was backed by a large majority of scouting parents and a US Supreme Court victory no less, told me all I needed to know. The amoral fat cats now running this once venerable organization wanted the change to preserve their "gay"-controlled corporate donor base but wanted the blame to fall on others.
If anyone really believes this already destructive capitulation by the BSA will remain limited to the boys and not extend to the leaders, or that the homo-fascists are going to be placated by this half-measure, I have a bridge I'd like to sell you. I say we should take the whole organization down as quickly as possible to make room for a replacement that will protect and serve the boys and not the perverts. Here is my contribution to that effort: a little historical context to show the danger America's youth are now facing in a homosexualized scouting movement. As the saying goes, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat its tragedies.
(Excerpt) Read more at renewamerica.com ...
Yes, back.
Read the article. It is an exceptionally well researched article about the roots of the scouting movement in Germany in the late 19th and early 20th century and how they where destroyed by the pederast perverts. It is quite enlightening.
Someone else will start a new organization that doesn’t promote anal sex between males. Team Obama might fight it though. Perhaps Obama will go ‘Gibson Guitar’ on them.
I looked that up and found this, about the AT& T CEO/BSA connection.
Disgusting!
We had our first troop meeting since the announcement last night. The dads got together along with the Scoutmaster to discuss it all. We all agreed to ride it out and deal with any homo kids as bullies. Not that we are likely to see any. Troop dads in this troop are a very macho bunch.
Being a private organization, there is no way we can know. There is no way to examine the voting process, the delegate selection, or the integrity of the vote. The BSA basically decided how it would be, and then concocted this laughable theater to attempt to present to the public their pathetic justification for the change. But it's as transparent as the Obama Admin is opaque.
And that was my nice analysis.
Secondly, when our military is undermined with females, gays, lesbians and emasculated boys groomed by the Gay Scouts, the Dictator can be assured they'll be submissive and not fight to save the 'traditional Republic founded by those evil heterosexual white guys'.
The Dictatorship's goal is to emasculate males and kill their will to revolt against the police state. Apparently, it's working.
“new organization that doesn’t promote anal sex between males. Team Obama might fight it though.”
The IRS thugs will hold up the new org’s 501c application forever.
Well, that’s one discussion. Now, how about getting the Troop Committee to do its job? And, while you’re about it, it might be a good idea to get some input from the Chartering Organization, too. When you have those ducks in a row and quacking in unison, then you might have a plan.
Just an FYI, the Scoutmaster does not run the troop. I’ve already BTDT and saw a good SM leave because he couldn’t understand that simple organizational principle. The Committee, registered and approved as such by the Chartering Organization, is the responsible group.
take your boys OUT of BoyScouts right away!
move them to another organization that at least tries to teach and maintain some moral values for the kids
nothing, nobody’s perfect but an official policy permitting open homosexuality in a boy’s group is intolerable
parents who leave their boys in Scouts should be charged with child abuse, as certainly should be the leaders of the Scout organization!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I’m suspicious of the Mormon contingent in the BSA. I can’t help but wonder if the LDS is hoping to use gay marriage to maneuver polygamy to legal status.
Because I see a parallel in polygamous Muslim culture which is also rife with pederasty. Boys for pleaure, women for children.
Just that little voice in the back of my head, saying hmmm...
/tinfoil
Now the scouts can be like the late 19th and early 20th century Wandervogel movement in Germany.
You said if you see any as a bully. The policy is now that you and the other leaders cannot do what you have posted in event of legal repercussions. You are not thinking overall what that new policy says.
Chartering organization (some sort of Christian church) is on-board. I hope it works out as my young Scout has plenty that he can learn from this troop.
The perverts can't resist their attraction to a large endowment.
When I talk to other parents and they say their boy is in the boy scouts, I’m going to assume the boy is a homosexual.
they should be charged with child abuse or, probably easier to get convictions on, “contributing to the delinquency of a minor”
if good people with boys in Scouts start filing such charges with their local District Attorney/ Attorneys General, it just might do the trick (of propelling a correction, retraction of this horrible new policy)
God gave His Son to purchase those Boy Scouts souls back, and the Scout leadership has now given those souls back to Satan.
Homosexuals, leave our kids and their organizations alone.
Even if you can hold the line in your troop, in all likelihood there will be all sorts of mandatory offensive "sensitivity training" National will insist on.
Furthermore, I just don't want to give the pricks the satisfaction of gloating that not many folks left.
So, unless our Council leaves the national BSA immediately (there is a rumor to that effect), within two weeks I will resign as Assistant Scout Master and take my son out.
Good news is that alternative organizations are quickly forming.
If I were part of the governance of a Chartering Organization of any stripe, I would have to sadly recommend that we no longer charter a BSA unit. The new policy opens the possibility for the chartering group to have a liability, no matter how they choose to administer the new policy. If they do as your informal meeting proposed, any youth that is disciplined can raise holy heck and have the weight of the policy behind him. If you simply implement the new policy, any claim of improper activity would immediately create a liability situation for the chartering organization.
The safe thing is to not have the liability exposure. It is a sad but true fact of today’s world, IMO. Unfortunately, it’s LOSE - LOSE - LOSE all the way around.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.