Posted on 06/03/2013 2:00:47 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
I think she’s definitely anti-Zimmerman.
I guess that will be in exchange for not allowing any of the damning evidence in from Trayvons past life of crime and thuggery.
There are no eyewitnesses to what happened other than George Zimmerman himself. There are some neighbors who heard the noise. Zimmerman has a constitutional right to be confronted with the witnesses against him--who are in effect Dee Dee and Crump. O'Mara should be able to cross-examine them. Judge Nelson knows what verdict she wants and doesn't want to be delayed with such technicalities.
Unfortunately, even if Zimmerman is acquitted, he will probably have to live in hiding for years or else be murdered. If he is sentenced to prison he's likely to be killed by one of the inmates.
Absolutely excellent news. Quite simply, Crump’s lies about “Dee Dee” will all come out, and this will end the trial almost as soon as it begins.
Here’s an excellent and obvious (once it’s pointed out) observation from TCTH:
“Benjamin Crump was paying an attorney to get him out of it. If it were “no biggie” then why not just sit down.”
Somebody should add a laugh track to that!
WooHoo!!!
Donate and drive the racist Christina Coleman over at Global Grind even further off the deep end...
None of these crack news outlets have picked up this news — not even the Orlando Slantinel. They are still shell shocked.
They need outside help to figure out what the spin will be.
Likely the most rational reason for Crump interviewing by tele is this:
a. There are 2 DD’s
b. Crump had already been seen in the presence of DD 1
c. However, DD 1 dropped off due to her parents not wanting their daughter to possibly get into trouble
d. Crump had to come up with another “ear witness” in order to keep the narrative working
e. Ergo...DD2 was found (created)
f. In order to afford Crump plausible deniability, the interview was set up the way it was, so that if/when some future date Crump is confronted with his role in the fraud he can say “I did not realize the person I was interviewing was not the same girl” (because he could not see her...she was on the phone and the other people were “fooling” him by making him think it was the same girl).
I’m guessing he suddenly withdraws from the case for health reasons.
How is Crump *in* the case? This is a criminal prosecution - the county District Attorney (representing the State of Florida) vs. the Defendant and his lawyer. Absent any evidence to the contrary, I consider Crump to be an Obama mouthpiece, hired to stir up racial strife.
George Zimmerman Preview: The 2:32 that changed everything
Thanks Leni.
Keep posting all the good news!!
Great News!!!!
Just watched 30 minutes of the most upsetting stuff yet on that awful channel HLN after dark, they have a jury seated, 11 of them are ready to convict George, with one holdout, and he appeared to have pink hair
The lawyers that work for that channel are for the most part all ready to convict
I would like to see that station taken off the air, just very offensive from morning to night.
The Air head in the morning Robin Meads or something like that, just one dirty Democrat after another...very offensive regardless of the subject
sfl
Crumplestiltskin
You are so clever.
5.56mm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.