Posted on 06/07/2013 4:35:54 PM PDT by real_patriotic_american
Congress is not asking the big questions..... Bill directs them to Obama!
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativevideos.com ...
Impeachment requires a congress willing to do it. It would be nice if all the witnesses to what we now know to be a cover-up could have their day in court, however.
Commander-in-Chief is job 1 for POTUS.
POSHITUS let our men die horrible deaths and spent 7 hours trying on scenarios for covering it up. That’s dereliction of duty prima facie, and treason on top of that.
The House could impeach Obama! The Senate would be forced to rule guilty or be exposed in public with their decison for not guilty against the evidence.
“Impeachment requires a congress willing to do it. It would be nice if all the witnesses to what we now know to be a cover-up could have their day in court, however.”
Agree!
“Impeach the Liar-in-Chief!!”
Nobody has made a good case for impeachment over Benghazi. It was a dishonorable and cowardly decision but impeachable? No.
Usagi_yo ~:” Nobody has made a good case for impeachment over Benghazi. It was a dishonorable and cowardly decision but impeachable? No.”
Since you dont accept dereliction of duty , nor abandoning your post ... agreed !
However , there are over 30 other witnesses who haven’t been heard from ..with immunity !
Bring out ALL the witnesses !
Usagi_yo ~:” Nobody has made a good case for impeachment over Benghazi. It was a dishonorable and cowardly decision but impeachable? No. “
Obviously you don’t beleive that the issue is a violation of oath of office .
I beleive that it is a violation “to protect , and defend the Constitution” ( Constitutional rights of the victims).
Everything this man has done is a clear case for impeachment.
Clearly, no one is going to impeach him.
He's third in line, right?
They knew that it was a terrorist attack even before Amb. Stevens was murdered! Instead, they blamed it on a the video during an election year. That’s another impeachable offense in my opinion!
Impeach, and incarcerate, either order is acceptable!
So? Like it or not, I don’t recall any requirement that Obama has to let the general population of the U.S micro manage his job as Commander and Chief of the U.S armed forces.
Sure, we can question him and hope we get the answers, but he is the Commander and Chief of the Armed forces and his word on their strategy and policy is pretty strong and final.
There can’t be a cover up when there is nothing illegal, and as cowardly the decisions made vis-a-vis Benghazi, there was nothing illegal about it. embarrassing yes, illegal, I don’t believe so.
Benghazi is a good stick to beat the administration up publicly, but the real meat and illegal activity is buried in the IRS, EPA, NSA, FBI and treasury. So lets only use the ‘I’ word for realistic things.
Benghazi is really about Hillary.
Usagi_yo also happens to be an anti-birther, as demonstrated by his posting history. I smell a rat.
Lying to the American people about an Al Qaeda attack on our embacy on September 11th, for starters.
Forget the coverup and misdirection. What was going on at Benghazi?
If Obama gave an rescue order and it wasn’t obeyed he would be leading the charge to find the breakdown. But he is not.
He either didn’t give a rescue order or the order was to stand-down.
Testimony is that two stand-down orders were issued. If those stand-down orders did not come from Obama he would be leading the charge to find who did. But he is not.
A reasonable conclusion is that Obama gave the stand-down orders.
If Al Qaeda was not involved there would be no reason to scrub references from reports.
A reasonable conclusion is that an operation involving AlQaeda was compromised, stand-down orders were given: personnel at the scene were expendable. A known false story about a video was pushed.
A reasonable conclusion is that a operation involving Al Qaeda had to be concealed.
What was going on in Benghazi? Were arms given to AlQaeda?
If you don't know, then how do you figure impeachment is the answer?
Because you don't like Obama. I don't either, but I try and see the forest through the trees despite that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.