Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid; LucyT

Your numbers are correct when it’s about ratio of males to females.

So, the over 25,000 of what’s called “unwanted contacts” of male on male are by mostly heterosexuals “fooling around” with each other? Do you believe that since the ratio of heterosexual males to faggots is very high, are heterosexuals responsible for most of the “UWC?”

Do you think this huge number of “UWC” has nothing to do with the influx of fags and lesbos in the military? Can you guess the percentage of fag on heterosexual “UWC?”

The MSM-protected faggotry in the military will never let the public know how the horrible policy of homosexuals in the military is really working out.

I wonder if you know something most of us don’t.


6 posted on 06/08/2013 5:14:07 PM PDT by melancholy (Professor S. Alinsky, Fleet Maintenance, White Hive Trolley Bosses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: melancholy

Good grief. Please look at the data. Not sure where you guys are getting this supposedly 25k number of male-on-male assaults but it’s totally bogus. Of the 26,000, roughly half are male victims, and half are female victims. Of the male victims, about half have a female perpetrator and roughly half a male perpetrator.

And yes, if you actually look at the data, instead of spouting off about what you wish were true to fulfill the conclusions you’ve already decided in advance, you’d find that the male on male crimes do in fact tend to be the least severe, i.e., the butt grabs, etc. Anyone who has ever spent any time among jocks or frat boys would not be shocked.


7 posted on 06/09/2013 11:10:49 AM PDT by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson