Yeah, I’m sure they were “joking.”
Their job is threatened. Union workers do the same thing.
I listened to the video of his interview while in Hong Kong.
I read some threads that referenced his extremely lean resume regarding education and work history. Obama’s extremely lean backgound comes to mind. Per some news reports, Mr. Snowden only worked for the contractor for about 3 months.
What qualified him to attain such a sensitive position in such a security company? His security clearance level would have to be massively high for the type of data and activities he was apparently involved in.
I am beginning to wonder whether Mr. Snowden is a ‘shiny object’ offered as a distraction.
Something isn’t setting right — with these new revelations — and an administration that has a history of deflecting, distracting, demeaning, etc.
Ha Ha Ha Ha. Real freakin’ hilarious.
I am all for killing known, proven, Islamic Terrorists with these strikes.
But, under Obama, we could soon see them extend to an American citizen who is simply opposing the Obama administration's illegal and unconstitutional acts, and is willing (and brave enough) to stand up and openly say something against it.
that’s a viable threat and could probably be successfully prosecuted
polonium 210, Russian style?
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2338418/Steve-Clemons-leak-Intelligence-officials-overheard-joking-NSA-leaker-disappeared-handing-classified-documents-press.html#ixzz2VpN0UXDR
IOW, Clemons has no proof. What the hell kind of journalist is he?
Perhaps they wanted to be overheard. Any operative would know not to talk about such things in a public place, above all in an airport.
Uh....they weren’t “joking.”
When will Dreams From my Father be required to be on all living room coffee tables (or some other prominent visible location to "show our loyalty" to Dear Leader)?
I think it is insanely ironic that their conversation was overheard.
People sometimes understand that there are causes greater than themselves.
FREEDOM!
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Tell us what parts of PRISM adhere to that?
If the government isn’t doing something wrong, why are they so pissed that Snowden told the world what the government is doing...that isn’t wrong?
Why are we getting our “real” news from UK papers or the BBC to find out WTH is going on in America? Something doesn’t smell right here.
They have the means to do it. It’s no joke.