Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

License, registration and cell phone: Bill would let N.J. cops search phones after crashes
NJ ^ | 6/10/13 | Ryan Hutchins, Matt Friedman

Posted on 06/11/2013 2:32:12 AM PDT by Libloather

TRENTON — License, registration and cell phone, please.

Police officers across New Jersey could be saying that to motorists at the scenes of car crashes if new legislation introduced in the state Senate becomes law.

The measure would allow cops — without a warrant — to thumb through a cell phone to determine if a driver was talking or texting when an accident occurred. It requires officers to have "reasonable grounds" to believe the law was broken.

Supporters say it could be an important tool for cops investigating crashes in a state where distracted driving causes lots of accidents and driving while using hand-held cell phones is illegal.

(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cell; njcrash; phone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Are Hussein phones exempt?
1 posted on 06/11/2013 2:32:13 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

CDL commercial driver licensed drivers ie truck drivers are already under federal regs on cell phone crimes. I should think that less qualified drivers especially (on NJz) should be behaviourially nannied too.


2 posted on 06/11/2013 2:42:34 AM PDT by Recompennation (Constitutional protection for all not just selectively for Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Can’t the cops just check with the NSA?


3 posted on 06/11/2013 2:44:00 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (July 4, 1776: Declaration of Independence. Nov 6, 2012: Declaration Uof Dependence. R.I.P. America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

TO ALL AMBULANCE CHASING LAWYERS AND PROSECUTORS:

Supboena cell phone metadata from the NSA as evidence in any case you have involving a car and a cell phone owner....


4 posted on 06/11/2013 2:52:05 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Subpoena vs. subpoena...


5 posted on 06/11/2013 2:52:32 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I actually think this is a good idea, provided they are only searching for the time of the last call, and not whether you were on a conference call with the Heritage Foundation, Hillsdale College, Concerned Women for America, Tea Party Express and the Family Research Council.

Nothing wrong with states being able to enforce road safety.


6 posted on 06/11/2013 3:27:18 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("There can be no dialogue with the prince of this world." -- Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

What happens when they find evidence of another crime not related to the accident?


7 posted on 06/11/2013 3:33:31 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

BAD IDEA!

Refer to the Fourth Amendment.


8 posted on 06/11/2013 3:34:04 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dinodino

It would be nice to know if a teen was texting when they smacked your bumper and caused over $2,000 worth of damage though. Happened to me a few years ago and yes she was texting.


9 posted on 06/11/2013 3:53:32 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dinodino; driftdiver

Like I said, the law would have to exclude any evidence other than the time of the last call. Anything else would be inadmissible in court.


10 posted on 06/11/2013 3:55:41 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("There can be no dialogue with the prince of this world." -- Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

“Nice to know” doesn’t justify illegal search and seizure. Besides, if they need to know if the cell phone was active, they can subpoena the records from the cell phone company and determine perfectly accurately. No need to allow warrant less searches by cops.


11 posted on 06/11/2013 3:56:13 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What if the driver claims they don’t have a cell phone with them? Can the cops search the car and person without a warrent? What if the cops claim they saw a phone being used, can they search?


12 posted on 06/11/2013 3:56:51 AM PDT by RadiationRomeo (Step into my mind and glimpse the madness that is me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadiationRomeo

Exactly! A shockingly bad idea—no big surprise it’s coming out of NJ.

Cellphone data is used in court all the time, but it’s legally obtained via the court, NOT from some 86 IQ cop on the street stealing the cellphone.


13 posted on 06/11/2013 4:03:05 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Cell phone? What cell phone. I left it at home. Now they will search your car.


14 posted on 06/11/2013 4:04:51 AM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

he can get a warrant if he wants to look at the phone


15 posted on 06/11/2013 4:09:50 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

But then, if he has a warrant to search, the search can be wide. If, however, the law under consideration stipulates he can request the phone only to see if it was in use during the incident, then police can be limited to merely recording that fact and getting a confirming log of the time only.


16 posted on 06/11/2013 4:16:47 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("There can be no dialogue with the prince of this world." -- Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dinodino

I agree with your points.

I am also amazed at the number of posters on this forum so willingly give up my rights because it may benefit them.

There are perfectly legal ways to get the information wanted if and this is a big if, it is needed.

Because the legislature writes a law, does not mean it is constitutional.


17 posted on 06/11/2013 4:23:52 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (California does not have a money problem, it has a spending problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

Thank you for your post! Cellphone usage data is used in traffic accident cases all the time, but again, it’s obtained through court order. I can’t understand so-called “conservatives” on this site whom are all too happy to trample our rights if they feel it makes them, personally, 1/100th of a percent “safer.”


18 posted on 06/11/2013 4:31:41 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The Peoples Republic of New Jersey strikes again.


19 posted on 06/11/2013 4:38:22 AM PDT by ironleg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
This is a terrible idea. The legislation in New Jersey is being sponsored by a Republican who was a former prosecutor, and many of the readers commenting on the local news website -- even in a radical Marxist haven like New Jersey -- are calling for the guy to be disbarred and thrown out of office.

If a driver's cell phone records are relevant to a police investigation of a motor vehicle accident, then they can obtain a warrant to check those records.

It's really that simple.

20 posted on 06/11/2013 4:42:44 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I am the master of my fate ... I am the captain of my soul.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson