Posted on 06/17/2013 8:03:34 PM PDT by jazusamo
and how many states are going to do that?
This is a hint to the red states and purple states where election integrity is a front burner issue. It is not a Left or Right issue, but an issue of those who (still) have faith in the election process and those who want to subvert it for purposes of maintaining power--and both parties have their minions and hangers on who want to suppress the vote.
Good, now if that immigration reform bill fails to pass then we can have a double celebration.
Thanks for the post!
I still wonder what what caused Thomas and Alito to be the two dissenting votes.
Maybe they wanted to be batting 1.000 instead of .800
Yes, Adams is one of the DOJ attorneys who was involved in the New Black Panther fiasco and quit over it when Holder and thugs dropped the case after it had been won.
Yes, that’s how I interpret it.
True. The Amnesty Bill passage would make requiring ID practically irrelevant. Not to mention, why would we even bother having elections at that point?
I completely did not get it this way at all.
What I find disturbing about this is that , due to the complexity of the bureaucracy, this may be a win, but I fully expect that liberals will, knowing that even plugged in and well informed voters may not grasp it, obfuscate, break the law, then obfuscate some more when called on it.
It is like trying to explain Whitewater to someone. Their eyes begin to glaze.
I hear you and don’t have the slightest idea, maybe more will come out later.
If the one that puts prisoners in tents in the desert with pink jump suits does not do it probably not many.
But it would be an interesting thing - and legal thing - if they did do it.
You know, this is something like the third or fourth SCOTUS case in the last couple years with a “strange bedfellows” alignment of the Liberal bloc and some of the Conservatives where the initial reaction has been that of a huge victory for the Left but upon reflection looks like sly victory for Conservatives.
I’m wondering if the Conservatives on the Court have figured out a way of manipulating the Liberals into Conservative-favoring majority opinions. Give up on some minor point to win several major points and walk away with a solid 6-3 or even more solid 7-2 majority that dispels the notion of partisan bias.
Even though I strenuously disagree with the decision (”strenuously” isn’t actually a strong enough word for my feeling on this - the damn thing should have been struck down immediately and in it’s entirety), I have wondered if that’s what Roberts was trying for with the ObamaCare opinion. While the opinion left the piece of garbage standing under the auspices of the Gvt’s ability to tax, Roberts pulled all four Liberal Justices into supporting a majority opinion that defined - for the first real time since the New Deal iirc - good limits on what the Federal Gvt can do in the face of the 10th Amendment.
Let’s hope the overseer of the pink prisoners reads this thread, if this is accurate.
AZ uses an AZ form in all state places of registration such as DMV, welfare office and such which requires ID. How many truly federal office would a citizen visit?
sfl
Nice theory.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.