Posted on 06/30/2013 7:11:00 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Interesting article here:
Site , the Last Refuge. Explains the “follow the money angle”
Me too.
LOOK for looting and violence if Zimmerman is not convicted..
The black race baters are just looking for any reason to riot...So look for it regardless of the outcome of the trial.
They are related to the “Hodedoh”, “Monback”, and “Motesah” tribes.
Forgot to add /s after my post.
I wish I could find this article about THE IGNORNT Chubs testifying and some of the comments that followed All said they would riot and some said they needed certain items so they hoped there was a riot..
factor in another 60-90 minutes for one more free lunch.
Why would an attorney take only a measly 50% share?
They're used to much bigger piece of the action.
LOL! I stand corrected. 5 minutes plus lunch.
Like the OJ fiasco, the government and the prosecution team need to gin up another winning slogan:
“If he’s a cracker, he must be the attacker”
Sidewalks within a private apartment complex are not public property.
Maybe the complex owner can sue in civil court for recovery of blood cleanup expenses.
I would think that would be important to the defense.....How come it was never asked?
I think it will be a hung jury, a mistrial declared and a new trial will need to be rescheduled...with GZ thrown back into prison to await in seeming limbo as to when such a new trial should take place!
Excellent site!!!
Poat #43 . . . OUTSTANDING!
I know. My point was that if GZ was so intent on murdering TM he would have approached him with his gun out. I’m just pointing out that the idiots attempt to paint GZ as vicious is pathetic and there’s no actions on GZ’s behalf to point that he intended to kill or had malicious intent.
[ Sidewalks within a private apartment complex are not public property.]
Lol...Thanks for pointing that out to me and others, in the future, I will be careful to be more factual when I post such serious comments.
Thank you.
My snark was for the press, not for you.
-- I've been following the trial coverage and editorial comments outside of the mainstream press and not a single commentator or legal analyst seems to know about this mandatory instruction. --
That's not unusual. If you want to know, for sure, you have to find an authority. No, I am not an authority. I cited the relevant case law somewhere in the past few days of my posts.
-- If a manslaughter conviction were possible, I'd expect that at least one of the many lawyers and judges (among them, Judge Napolitano, Alan Dershowitz, Judge Pirro) would have addressed that possibility. --
I don't think any conviction is a possibility, because the state won't be able to disprove justified use of force beyond a reasonable doubt. But that is a different question from whether or not the jury will be given a manslaughter instruction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.