Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: henkster

Hmmm... a plan to force a mistrial to let the prosecution off the hook rather than a “not guilty” verdict?


26 posted on 07/02/2013 11:46:39 AM PDT by kevkrom (Obama: less class than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom

Mistrial motions must be made contemporaneously with the occurrence. You can’t ask for a mistrial the day after. I don’t know whether Florida law allows a judge to call a mistrial “sua sponte,” meaning “this farce has gone on long enough and I’m red-flagging the race.” But I doubt she will do that.

For her to call a mistrial, the state is going to have to deliberately throw a “harpoon,” the kind of question that elicits and answer so prejudicial that no appellate court would let the conviction stand. Typical harpoons involve questions relating to a defendant’s prior criminal record. In this case, it could be the prosecutor stating “We had an expert who was going to say it was poor little Trayvon calling for help, but the Judge wouldn’t let you hear it.”


30 posted on 07/02/2013 11:57:23 AM PDT by henkster (The 0bama regime isn't a train wreck, it's a B 17 raid on the rail yard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson