Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terrorist Rocks Rolling Stone
Townhall.com ^ | July 19, 2013 | Brent Bozell

Posted on 07/19/2013 5:47:43 AM PDT by Kaslin

The dwindling number of people still reading Rolling Stone knows that just as MTV no longer is a music station, this is not just a music magazine. Nevertheless, the magazine's covers are almost always rock and pop stars, and sometimes movie and TV actors. In recent months, that list has included glamorizing shots of Jay-Z, Rihanna, Bruno Mars and Justin Bieber (who's now "Hot, Ready, Legal").

But nearly every issue also carries political commentary from fiercely frothing leftist writers like Matt Taibbi. When the editors decided to put Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on the cover, they knew they were courting controversy. They must have known they were chasing notoriety by insulting people who lost relatives or their own limbs in Dzhokhar's terrorist attack.

What must have been the reaction of the parents who lost 8-year-old Martin Richard?

The victims and their families surely choked when the magazine responded to the furor by claiming, "Our hearts go out to the victims of the Boston Marathon bombing, our thoughts are always with them and their families." What arrogant nonsense.

Boston's liberal Democrat mayor, Tom Menino, delivered a scathing rebuke in a letter to publisher Jann Wenner. "The survivors of the Boston attacks deserve Rolling Stone cover stories, though I no longer feel that Rolling Stone deserves them."

Rolling Stone claimed the cover story would showcase everything writer Janet Reitman found by spending "two months interviewing dozens of sources -- childhood and high school friends, teachers, neighbors and law enforcement agents, many of whom spoke for the first time about the case -- to deliver a riveting and heartbreaking account of how a charming kid with a bright future became a monster."

And then they put his picture, James Dean-like, on the cover. They claimed this kind of reporting is part of their journalistic tradition. It isn't.

Their tradition has not included regular covers with newsmakers or notorious bombers. When their journalism on Afghanistan abruptly ended the career of Gen. Stanley McChrystal in 2010, the cover displayed Lady Gaga nearly nude, her body covered only by a thong bikini and two machine guns.

Some tried to defend Rolling Stone by noting that several news organizations had used the same picture of Tsarnaev, including the front page of The New York Times. But Rolling Stone occupies a special zone in the popular culture, where top musicians hope and pray to know they've "made it" by making the cover.

If Sports Illustrated had put Dzhokhar on its cover, that would also be jarring. They could have. They didn't. They put cops and a disoriented runner on the cover at the time of the murders.

The text of the cover doesn't glorify the killer. It reads: "The Bomber: How a Popular, Promising Student Was Failed by His Family, Fell Into Radical Islam, and Became a Monster."

But that glimmer of sadness for the bomber's lost childhood, the disappearance of a "charming kid with a bright future," shows more effort to find a terrorist's moral center than the magazine showed any of the last three Republican presidential nominees.

Last year, Rolling Stone's cover carried a cartoon of Mitt Romney in a top hat and an ascot with the words "Greed and Debt: The True Story of Mitt Romney and Bain Capital." Matt Taibbi sold Romney as pure evil:

"Romney's run has been a shimmering pearl of perfect political hypocrisy. ... Romney chose his running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin -- like himself, a self-righteously anal, thin-lipped, Whitest Kids U Know penny pincher who'd be honored to tell Oliver Twist there's no more soup left."

In 2008, John McCain was also a cartoon on the cover, with the words "Make-Believe Maverick: A closer look at the life and career of John McCain reveals a disturbing record of recklessness and dishonesty."

Rolling Stone also ran two cartoon covers of George W. Bush, both making him look very much like a chimpanzee. Keith Olbermann lovingly promoted the 2006 cover titled, "The Worst President In History?" They followed in 2008 with "How Bush Destroyed the Republican Party." Both were written by socialist historian Sean Wilentz. In 2006, Wilentz admitted to Olbermann, "I think the cover actually is a bit over the top."

When Obama was inaugurated, the magazine did it again with a more serious illustration of Bush 43 and a cover story that was completely made up. "Exclusive! Bush Apologizes: The Farewell Interview We Wish He'd Give."

No one expects Rolling Stone to follow up with a cover that imagines "Dzhokar Apologizes: The Prison Interview We Wish He'd Give." If they had ever really had the Boston victims in their hearts, they might. But they don't.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/19/2013 5:47:43 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

RS is a narcissist, attention whore leftist rag sheet


2 posted on 07/19/2013 5:51:02 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well, it is not every day they can find a terrorist who looks like Syd Barrett. (How did my auto-correct know how to spell “Barrett”?)


3 posted on 07/19/2013 5:55:36 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch (http://thegatwickview.tumblr.com/ -- http://thepurginglutheran.tumblr.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3044858/posts


4 posted on 07/19/2013 6:02:41 AM PDT by Bushbacker1 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Memo

To: Jann Wenner

From: Reality

Jann; The 60’s are over. Grow up.


5 posted on 07/19/2013 6:02:49 AM PDT by henkster (The 0bama regime isn't a train wreck, it's a B 17 raid on the rail yard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

... political commentary from fiercely frothing leftist writers like Matt Taibbi

Actually, the majority of Taibbi's output is well researched, well written, and spot on.

Taibbi has been brutal in his reporting of Wall Street corruption, but them's the facts.

In my opinion, the guy's articles are a breath of fresh air compared to the stink coming out of the mainstream media, and Bozell's comments in this case are out line.

6 posted on 07/19/2013 6:02:53 AM PDT by Zakeet (Democrats: Making everything free in this country except you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The trash rag is disgusting, but even worse were the ignorant groupies who held signs and screamed their adoration for a murderous muslim. What are their parents teaching these morons these days? It’s a sad commentary on the type of people who will be running this country when we leave it to them.

Lord, please come soon!


7 posted on 07/19/2013 6:10:14 AM PDT by mardi59 (IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I'm not the least bit interested in any apology from Dzhokar, no matter how sincere it may seem. If I were king, I strap a pressure cooker bomb to him & shove him out of a cargo plane over Dagestan, & detonate him 100 feet over his mama's house.

As for RS, I like to see a competing magazine post a picture of the dead little boy & the blast victims.

Rolling Stone Magazine sux!!!

8 posted on 07/19/2013 6:11:10 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Zakeet
"Romney's run has been a shimmering pearl of perfect political hypocrisy."

"A closer look at the life and career of John McCain reveals a disturbing record of recklessness and dishonesty."

I don't see any "fiercely frothing Leftism" here - just accurate observations that the Big RINOs like Bozell who control "conservative media" don't want to hear. The same goes for his financial reporting - when Republicans accept cash from evil sources, they had better be prepared to take the media heat.

When Taibbi starts applying the same level of critical scrutiny to Obama's scandals (and I think he eventually will) the White House will have a big problem.

9 posted on 07/19/2013 6:15:21 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

“and I think he eventually will”

He’s had 5 years and some pretty juicy stuff to work with.

I know this man’s name, and I’m sure I’ve read some stuff by him, but I don’t really *know* who he is.

But I think you’re kidding yourself. The MSM is NEVER going to delve into the many atrocities of the Obama administration.

I cannot imagine what horrific revelation(s) there would have to be for that to happen. I honestly think he’d have to kill somebody, in front of both live witnesses and several cameras, and I’m not sure who that somebody would have to be. Maybe a puppy, or a baby, but a puppy they’d say it was just a throw back to his days in Indonesia and a baby they’d say it was just a very late term abortion; I don’t think killing his wife would do it, or any random white person; like I say I can’t imagine what would get the media to turn on their ultimate hero, Barack Hussein Obama.


10 posted on 07/19/2013 6:23:56 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: henkster

Are you kidding, Wenner thinks he’s just ‘dreamy.’


11 posted on 07/19/2013 6:24:33 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Exactly. Jan Wenner has “Homo-erotic” art on this cover as far as he’s concerned.


12 posted on 07/19/2013 6:46:02 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This isn’t new. RS did the same thing with Charles Manson. Profits must be down and this is getting them loads of free publicity. RS has been nothing but crap for decades now.


13 posted on 07/19/2013 6:58:20 AM PDT by rhoda_penmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I consider “Rolling Stone” real old school. Peeps subscribing to the magazine tend to be AARP members with scraggly grey pony tails (male) or bra-free sagging bosoms (female).


14 posted on 07/19/2013 7:02:18 AM PDT by Irish Queen ("Don't fence me in")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

You must have missed Taibbis hatchet job on the Koch brothers.


15 posted on 07/19/2013 7:05:51 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson