Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Plantation Theory: Time to retire a dumb Cornel West idea and the rhetoric that goes with it.
National Review ^ | 07/24/2013 | Kevin D. Williamson

Posted on 07/24/2013 7:26:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 07/24/2013 7:26:38 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
PROF. CORNEL WEST

2 posted on 07/24/2013 7:27:06 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I love Cornell West. Authentic caricatures are a rarity in nature.


3 posted on 07/24/2013 7:34:18 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
That is one of the reasons that affluent black households often end up less wealthy than white households with identical incomes and education levels. Women exhibit similarly risk-averse investing behavior with the same result.

I don't think it's cultural at all. Racial and gender quotas have resulted in a system where people are promoted way above their abilities - a system with a supercharged Peter Principle.

4 posted on 07/24/2013 7:34:23 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
but when he’s feeling froggy he can be a hoot.

I've never seen Colonel West acting like a Frenchman before.

5 posted on 07/24/2013 7:36:55 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Cornel that is.


6 posted on 07/24/2013 7:37:31 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

:: Democrats appeal to blacks, to other minority groups, and — most significant — to women with rhetoric and policies that promise the mitigation of risk. ::

This is a well reasoned article.


7 posted on 07/24/2013 7:37:43 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

He be’s like a Kentucky Colonel, sir.


8 posted on 07/24/2013 7:42:51 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Long ago when I was still a thin man I’d reached the same conclusion: that minorities were on a plantation, and their leadership were Overseers, keeping them in line and performing the most basic tasks with no more than fleeting promises of promotions from their work. And it’s still holds true today, Party notwithstanding.


9 posted on 07/24/2013 7:46:22 AM PDT by theDentist (FUBO; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The plantation rhetoric is distasteful for the same reason that facile Nazi tropes should be verboten: Some instances of evil are unique, and using them as a handy cudgel in every disagreement dilutes their emotional potency.

In principle, maybe, but slavish devotion to the Democratic [sic] party in spite of its deep and abiding disregard for blacks has resulted—literally, not figuratively—in great suffering that both could and ought to have been avoided. Incidentally, foreign words, "verboten," for example, even though widely understood, ought to be italicized.

Hitler was Hitler, and nobody else is.

I haven't noticed an acute shortage of wannabe Hitlers or Hitler admirers, nor of Marxist aspirations and policies even the old monster himself might well have had second thoughts about.

When black critics use plantation rhetoric, it is repugnant; when white critics use plantation rhetoric, it is repugnant and condescending.

That reminds me all too clearly of leftist extremists haughtily announcing what's politically correct and incorrect.

10 posted on 07/24/2013 7:50:27 AM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

The plantation analogy is very appropriate. Its not about cultivating and harvesting crops but it is about cultivating and harvesting votes. They keep them uneducated and dependent to keep them on the plantation.


11 posted on 07/24/2013 8:06:59 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I thought it was the dude in The naked Prey. But I guess not.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060736/
12 posted on 07/24/2013 8:10:22 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Democrats will give you the shirt off somebody elses back for a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Who ever you are get the hell off Free Republic!


13 posted on 07/24/2013 8:23:15 AM PDT by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Very good article. Thanks for posting.


14 posted on 07/24/2013 8:23:17 AM PDT by altsehastiin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I'm sorry, but I think the writer of this article is seeking to make a point that is considerably less rational than he seems to believe. He is unrealistically fastidious in trying to police the perfectly legitimate use of analogy in argument. And in that makes some distinctions that really are misleading. For example, consider this paragraph:

The plantation rhetoric is distasteful for the same reason that facile Nazi tropes should be verboten: Some instances of evil are unique, and using them as a handy cudgel in every disagreement dilutes their emotional potency. Hitler was Hitler, and nobody else is. The Reverend Sharpton is slavish, but he is not a slave. When black critics use plantation rhetoric, it is repugnant; when white critics use plantation rhetoric, it is repugnant and condescending.

Take the idea that Hitler was unique? Yes, as was Robespierre, Marx, Lenin & Obama. But all five used the technique of viciously scapegoating a small percentage of the population, for the same purpose, with very similar & very bloody results--except for Obama thus far. Just what about Hitler makes analogies to others who employ the same tactics in any way inappropriate. Actually, Hitler's worst offenses can be largely traced back to Marxist ideas, whjich hardly makes him unique.

The fact that Obama has not yet sent his scapegoats to the guillotine, or suggested as did Marx that the world would be better without Jews, or like Lenin or Hitler, sought to systematically exterminate targeted populations, does not change the clear instances of legitimate comparison. (Remember, Hitler, like Obama, won an election, and did not start the wholesale killing of the most targeted group until 9 years later.)

Does this mean that we should expect Obama to launch an extermination of his pilloried "1%," smeared in the 2012 campaign? No, but no one in France in 1789 really expected the "Reign of Terror" in the early 1790s. There are people who have advised Obama in the past, who have definitely identified with a Nazi like slaughter of targeted Americans. And didn't FDR's supporter Stuart Chase call for same even in the 1930s? The comparisons are completely legitimate.

For more on Hitler/Obama comparisons, see Leftwing Chickens Coming Home.

As for Al Sharpton, the writer is right that he is not a slave; but completely ridiculous in calling him "slavish." He is a scoundrel, who employs the same demagoguish tactics as a Marx or Hitler, to exploit people susceptible to being misled. Some of those tactics, like those of the Revolutionary movements in France, Germany & Russia, referred to, have already resulted in civilain deaths at the hands of thuggish supporters of the demagogue.

William Flax

15 posted on 07/24/2013 8:24:49 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upcountryhorseman
Who ever you are get the hell off Free Republic!


16 posted on 07/24/2013 8:25:14 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It's NOT about RACE !
It's about IDEOLOGY !


WHO was Anthony Johnson of the 1600s ?

WHO was John Casor ( Caster ) 1655 ?

WHY doesn't the media tell you about WHITE SLAVES owned by Blacks in the the United States ?

Why isn't White Slavery, Maternal Descent, And The Politics Of Slavery In The Antebellum United States, written by Lawrence Tenzer and A.D. Powell, REQUIRED READING in High School ?

Watch these videos:

How much more do you need to prove to yourself that (?) :
17 posted on 07/24/2013 8:28:06 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

BTTT


18 posted on 07/24/2013 8:28:48 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I equate the democrat party with the characters from kAnimal Farm. The farmer is the DNC The pigs are the black folk/women/gays that keep the mass in check.cthe rest are the useful idiots.


19 posted on 07/24/2013 8:39:09 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (The reason we own guns is to protect ourselves from those wanting to take our guns from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Looks like a black Nathan Bedford Forrest with spectacles.


20 posted on 07/24/2013 8:46:14 AM PDT by ZULU ((See: http://gatesofvienna.net/) Obama, do you hear me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson