Yes, the old “we already have defacto amnesty so lets legalize them” argument. Even RAND PAUL has made that argument. Rubio swears (or at least swore) by it.
That may be so, but it was wanton neglect and greedy need for cheap, ignorant labor that put on those opaque ‘defacto’ sunglasses.
I don’t give a damn who you are; if you are one of these equivocators and I find out about it, I’ll drop you like a hot potato. I’ll boycott, speak out, condemn and not vote for any candidate you’ve bought with your blood money.
You ‘rich’ donors are traitors. You should be ashamed and slink on off to whatever haven you’ve built because your dead to me.
You rich donors are traitors. You should be ashamed and slink on off to whatever haven youve built because your dead to me.
I second that!
How can they (members of both parties) sell cheap labor and, at the same time, want to raise the minimum wage? Republicans always cave to the Dems on it.
Wake up America! You can’t have both cheap, illegal labor and keep raising the minimum wage and put unskilled (public educated kids) out of work anywhere.
What a scam. Belize? Belirus? Costa Rica? Panama? John Galt’s place? I’m looking!!
The list is in post 40.
The reason the defacto amnesty argument can be made is because the federal government from top to bottom has been refusing to do its job to protect our borders.
In a way, it’s like someone not paying their mortgage or rent for several months, then telling the bank or the landlord, “Under the present system, we already have a mortgage/rent free arrangement.”