Skip to comments.
Obama Better Have the Goods on Syria
New York Magazine ^
Posted on 08/30/2013 11:24:52 AM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: Slyfox
I wonder how all the Jewish democrats who voted for Baraq TWICE are feeling about now?
Still full of "hope & change" I imagine...
21
posted on
08/30/2013 11:48:55 AM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: nickcarraway
Our new Syrian MISADVENTURE is a DIVERSION from all the domestic scandals besetting this gang of criminals.
Hey, all you stupid low and no information voters. Don’t look there. Look at this shiny thing over HERE!
22
posted on
08/30/2013 11:48:58 AM PDT
by
Dick Bachert
(“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”- Voltaire)
Only Two Days Until
September.
Less than $3k to go!!
We can do this!!
23
posted on
08/30/2013 11:50:37 AM PDT
by
RedMDer
(http://www.dontfundobamacare.com/)
To: Don Corleone
I’m still waiting to find out why we ever went into Afghanistan. Re Syria, BO will tell us how we will benefit as soon as Valerie, the Muslim Brotherhood and the speech writers let him know.
24
posted on
08/30/2013 11:51:08 AM PDT
by
Grams A
(The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Yep. Allowing the Boston bombing to happen so that the DHS could practice hijacking an entire city for training purposes. Or Sandy Hook, to further 0bama's anti-gun agenda at the start of his second term. Or the BP oil rig disaster, to give 0bama the excuse he needed to issue sweeping moratoriums on big oil. Or Arab Spring, to ouster Mubarak and fund and install terrorists (MB) to head Egypt. Or chemical weapons attack in Syria, to ouster Assad and install terrorists (AQ) in his place.. Blah blah blah.. Rinse and repeat.
0bama's quest to install terrorist groups to head Middle East governments is beyond worrisome. Thank God Egypt finally figured out what 0bama tried to do to them.
To: nickcarraway
Im predisposed to favor a punitive air strike against Syria for its apparent use of chemical weapons against civilians. So, the prevailing attitude is tha killing 100,000+ civilians with bombs and bullets is acceptable but killing 1,000+ with gas is not? Right?
Isn't it true that dead is dead in either case?
26
posted on
08/30/2013 11:57:03 AM PDT
by
varon
( cum tyrannis para bellum)
To: Dick Bachert
That’s true, too.. IRS scandal, Benghazi, DOJ spying on media, NSA spying on everyone.. POOF!!! And meanwhile, Iran gets closer to nukes.
To: henkster
There is an international treaty banning the use of chemical weapons against civilians....
And Syria didn’t sign it.
28
posted on
08/30/2013 11:58:31 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
To: Toespi
“Meanwhile, Obama is apparently ready to go it alone.”
But not Valerie Jarrett and that’s who matters
29
posted on
08/30/2013 11:59:06 AM PDT
by
Helotes
To: nickcarraway
Regarding the backlash, before this is over we may well see America's home land hit again due to obozo attacking Syria. All things considered, who's to say provoking an attack on America isn't part of the obozoâs plan to further damage the US? My sense is that the Chinese and Russian threats of retaliation had much to do with Britain folding.
To: cincinnati65
Classic liberal tactic; State a half truth, omitting a very material fact, and then base the entire argument on it, ignoring that the inclusion of the missing fact would completely eviscerate their argument.
What it really amounts to is a very clever way of lying. And this regime, with it’s more than willing media accomplices, is very good at the serial telling of an infinite number of these lies. In fact, I don’t think they are remotely capable of being honest about one damn thing. And that includes the media. That’s why I like this forum; it is a great way to find the truth.
31
posted on
08/30/2013 12:02:03 PM PDT
by
henkster
(If the Feds create an unlimited demand for bastard children, you get an unlimited supply of them.)
To: nickcarraway
In our progressive media circus world does it even matter if he has the goods?
Hussein killed over a million, not just 1,400 and the vicious vermin still go after us for Iraq.
So, by their logic, lets wait until 2 million are killed by any means.
Actually, I would prefer if we just wait until they annihilate each other then problem solved. A Syria without any Muslims would be a much better Syria.
32
posted on
08/30/2013 12:59:09 PM PDT
by
Wurlitzer
(Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam! 969)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Yeah, Im wondering how much overtime it cost us in the last 2 weeks? They'll say that the Truth Is Priceless . .
33
posted on
08/30/2013 1:46:44 PM PDT
by
ßuddaßudd
(>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
To: nickcarraway
who says it was going to be a Massacre in Libya? Ghadafi was going to attack in Benghazi which was a Hot bed Of Alqueda which we found out,to clean out the Al queda Bunch and for that Obama killed him
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson