Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama May Be Walking Into an Impeachment Trap
PopularResistance.org ^ | 8/30/12 | Kevin Zeese

Posted on 08/31/2013 12:38:55 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins

Obama May Be Walking Into an Impeachment Trap

Posted on Aug 30, 2013

Beth Rankin (CC BY 2.0)

By Kevin Zeese, PopularResistance

This article originated with PopularResistance.org.

The irony of the Obama presidency may hinge on whether he attacks Syria. He began his presidency prematurely winning the Nobel Peace Prize and could end it being impeached for starting an illegal war without congressional or UN approval – violating both domestic and international law.

Yesterday 163 Members of Congress sent letters to President Obama telling him that under the US Constitution he is required to get congressional approval before beginning a military attack. The letter drafted by Rep. Scott Rigel (R-VA) had 140 signatures, 119 Republicans and 21 Dems. Rep. Barbara Lee also circulated a letter that had 53 signers, that calls on the president to seek congressional approval.

The Rigel letter warned Obama that engaging in military action “would violate the Separation of Powers Clause that is clearly delineated in the Constitution.” They also note that the justification for war in Libya also violated the Constitution. The Lee letter warns that “we all swore to uphold and defend” the Constitution; and that we should not engage in an “unwise war – especially without adhering to our own Constitutional requirements.” In their concluding paragraph they warn “Before weighing the use of military force, Congress must fully debate and consider the facts and every alternative . . .”

President Obama knows the limits of his powers. In fact, if there is an impeachment proceeding his own words will be quoted. When he was running for president, Obama told the Boston Globe: “The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”

Vice President Biden, in a 2007 campaign event in Iowa, went further, not only stating clearly that the president does not have unilateral power to conduct military attacks but threatening impeachment of President Bush if he did so.

The Green Shadow Cabinet of the United States was explicit calling on President Obama to seek congressional approval before going to war, noted that under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11 of the US Constitution, it is the Congress that determines whether the United States goes to war. They also highlight the potential of impeachment writing: “If President Obama launches an attack without prior explicit authorization by Congress, he will have committed an offense worthy of impeachment.” [Disclosure, I serve as Attorney General in the alternative cabinet.]

If impeachment proceedings are held all of the doubts about the war will come out. People in the military have protected themselves by telling President Obama that they have serious doubts about a military attack. The have warned Obama about potential blowback, misusing the military to send a message with no clear strategy, drawing the US into a vexing war when they are already burdened by a complicated withdrawal from Afghanistan. Some have used words like “potentially devastating consequences” Reportedly, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Martin Dempsey, has warned in great detail about the risks and pitfalls of U.S. military intervention in Syria, warning “deeper involvement is hard to avoid.”

If the war goes wrong, and wars almost always go wrong, President Obama will see the memorandums of various members of the military who warned him. And, they will be called to testify and tell the world that President Obama was warned but went ahead anyway – without congressional approval in violation of the Constitution.

What could go wrong? Syria has the ability to defend itself and attack US military vessels. Iran and Russia have already indicated they will be drawn into the conflict. Threats of retaliation are already being made and troop movements are occurring. Russia is moving two additional naval ships, a missile cruiser and a large anti-submarine vessel, into the Mediterranean to strengthen its presence in case of a US attack. Russia and Saudi Arabia have exchanged threats over Syria. Russia threatening an attack on Saudi Arabia if the US attacks Syria with President Putin ordering a “massive military strike” against Saudi Arabia in the event that the West attacks Syria. Saudi Arabia is threatening Chechen terrorist attacks on Russia at the Olympics.

Iran, Syria and Hezbollah have threatened to retaliate against Israel and other US allies in the Middle East in the event of a US attack on Syria. Gen. Mohammad Ali Jafari, chief of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, told the Tasnim news website, that an attack on Syria “means the immediate destruction of Israel.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; benghazi; dictator; fastandfurious; illegalwar; impeach; impeachment; impeachnow; iran; irs; obama; randsconcerntrolls; separationofpowers; syria; syriawar; war; waronterror; warpowersact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-117 next last
To: Ann Archy

He is protected inside this country and out


51 posted on 08/31/2013 4:15:22 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

Yep.


52 posted on 08/31/2013 4:18:08 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

Bump!

Bowing to his Saudi masters.


53 posted on 08/31/2013 4:25:25 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
He began his presidency prematurely winning the Nobel Peace Prize and could end it being impeached for starting an illegal war without congressional or UN approval – violating both domestic and international law.

Good luck with that.
The chances of The One ever being impeached are less than Zer0.

54 posted on 08/31/2013 4:27:43 AM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Here is a good analysis of the power of the President and committing the military without Congressional approval. And the avoidance of the court in clarifying the issue as far as the Constitution is concerned.

http://www.daveross.com/war.html

It is clear that the President has the power to defend the nation if attacked without a prior Congressional approval.

It is also clear that the Constitution states the only Congress can “declare War”.

The Fed Gov has set some horrible precedents concerning this. Most, but not all under Dem administrations.


55 posted on 08/31/2013 4:39:24 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
"Obama could Nuke Kansas and strafe the survivors. It would not even be on the news."

Especially since it would be a black perp attacking and killing white victims. Nothing to see here, just a random act of violence.

56 posted on 08/31/2013 4:41:52 AM PDT by DJ Frisat ((optional, printed after my name on post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

This is a real question. Is there anyone in the military that can tell the president NO? I know he is the commander in chief, but if the military knows what he’s doing is unconstitutional and plain old insane...the military is sworn to uphold the Constitution, and they should especially when they are given unconstitutional orders.


57 posted on 08/31/2013 4:44:33 AM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
“Obama May Be Walking Into an Impeachment Trap”

Whistlin’ Dixie! There are far too many political @$$hol$s with the cajones to get it done.

58 posted on 08/31/2013 4:52:07 AM PDT by kenmcg (scapegoat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
Russia threatening an attack on Saudi Arabia if the US attacks Syria with President Putin ordering a “massive military strike” against Saudi Arabia in the event that the West attacks Syria.

Other than the loss of oil, I'm trying to find something bad about that. Exempt Israel and they can bomb the rest of the middle east for all I care.

59 posted on 08/31/2013 5:01:37 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
Boehner lacks the balls to bring articles of impeachment against Herr Obama.

It's just that simple.

60 posted on 08/31/2013 5:04:06 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Agree with you there. Want them out of New York City and our country.


61 posted on 08/31/2013 5:06:26 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Good grief, giving Boehner, McConnell, Cantor, et al, that much credit? What planet are we on? Is this still Earth?


62 posted on 08/31/2013 5:09:12 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (“Life is hard, but it’s harder when you’re stupid.” John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
Oh I certainly hope so... did someone slip some Testosterone into DC’s water supply?
63 posted on 08/31/2013 5:13:45 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
Do you believe Russia and China will attack the U.S.?

Know it isn't something impossible, but that isn't what they are saying now.

64 posted on 08/31/2013 5:15:59 AM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

They are not going to impeach half a Negro in this country.

Dreams of impeachment are just that Dreams.


65 posted on 08/31/2013 5:16:35 AM PDT by Venturer ( cowardice posturing as tolerance =political correctness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
" If Boehner were tossed out as Speaker and replaced with swine with a spine, impeachment proceedings could be initiated and actually even pass... in the House... but do we really think Harry Reid’s Senate would ever take this up, much less remove him from power? "

Actually ? I do see the Senate Democrats taking this up for one reason ? Hillary is waiting in the wings for the 2016 Presidential election and they sure do not want Obama taking the whole Democrat party down with him because of this silly war and among other things.
They can afford to lose the 2014 election because of this, but not the 2016.
66 posted on 08/31/2013 5:24:47 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

It’s worse than the Cuban missile crises.


67 posted on 08/31/2013 5:26:09 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Antihero101607
" Cue Race Card in...3...2...1... "

Ain't happening and the Democrats and the Main Stream Media know this.
68 posted on 08/31/2013 5:27:23 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet
The republican leadership was given ...an opportunity to spell out what was in Obamacare ...or even mention Democrats had refused any reference to God in the Democratic at their 2012 convention

Double Bump.

When the Democrat delegates booed the decision to revise the God-less platform stance of the Democrat party, I thought it was a Biblical moment, still do. Nothing could have distinguished the Democrat party from the Republican party more. There should have been ads running in 15 second spots both in English and Spanish.

And, why the heck can't the Republicans run ads that will counter the upcoming onslaught pro-Obamacare propaganda? For Pete's sake, they just have to tell the truth.

69 posted on 08/31/2013 5:28:47 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Producing Talk Show Prep since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

So Assad is the new Archduke Ferdinand?


70 posted on 08/31/2013 5:31:33 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Last I heard yesterday, even Obama was saying “limited, narrow” attack.

Maybe he’ll work out a side deal with the Russians that will let him back down gracefully. With all of the warning he’s given Assad, a few bombs in the desert will make him look tough and principled, but not do any damage.


71 posted on 08/31/2013 5:36:09 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

535 members of Congress — 163 members sent letters because they believe in the Constitution. It’s at least a beginning. Thank you.


72 posted on 08/31/2013 5:37:08 AM PDT by winkadink (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
Impeachment will never occur because the Liberals won’t allow it - not matter what Obsma does.

He can be impeached, all right, but he would never be convicted in the Senate, which is what is necessary for his removal.

73 posted on 08/31/2013 5:38:22 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Can we totally blame obama? He’s only doing what the GOPe CONgress is allowing him to do. They keep erasing their lines in the sand. CONgress is the parenting equivalent of telling children that they better stop misbehaving before mom counts to three. The kids then get three seconds to misbehave, which tells them that their actions aren’t really that bad, and mom ends up doing nothing in the end.


74 posted on 08/31/2013 5:48:06 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Obama is a sick fantasizing thug. He blames whites for colonizing, yet like all liberals, would love to subjugate himself other nations to feed him free icdcream like that moron in NorthKorea.


75 posted on 08/31/2013 6:00:58 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Accomplishes a couple of important things.
All these investigations by congress on all the bs this asshat has been doing ties up obammy and many of his psycophants.
If their time is taken up by this crap they can’t be ruining other things
Now impeachment has to be taken seriously. Lot of Klintons time was wasted on his impeachment even though he was not convicted in the senate,
I say tie this bastard up any way possible.
Also let him bomb Syria and God forbid they capture an American serviceman or woman.Maybe even our pathetic press would start turning.


76 posted on 08/31/2013 6:01:04 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) ( Hey Rubio, eat pooh pal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

I could see it: “Republicans want to impeach because they want to colonize the world and not let us”


77 posted on 08/31/2013 6:06:06 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
I am beginning to wonder about what type of people are calling themselves conservatives these days...they must live in an alternative universe...or think we are easily manipulated...

I certainly "wish" Obama would be impeached...but as they say..."Wish in one hand and crap in the other and see which gets filled up first"

There is no chance, none, not going to ever happen of Obama getting impeached...

He could rape little boys and eat live kittens on the White Hut lawn and it will not happen

First of all the House doesn't have the balls, the Senate even if in GOP hands won't have the votes to convict

Why do they pretend it's possible...?

78 posted on 08/31/2013 6:17:25 AM PDT by Popman (PTRD (Post Traumatic Racism Disorder)....coming to a court room soon....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

Obama is dangerous because he is foreign and uprooted. He has no home an hates that. He won’t be bothered when unkinned Americans get destroyed, and he won’t be bound as a colonizer to home politics or international politics of me vs. you.


79 posted on 08/31/2013 6:17:37 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

“Nucular combat, toe-to-toe with the Russkies!”


80 posted on 08/31/2013 6:18:37 AM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

“Sounds like the stage is set for WWIII. Not worth it.”

So true. Kerry really blistered Assad in yesterday’s speech as though Assad were Hitler reincarnated. Then he and the Mahdi suggested nothing more than pin prick cruise missile strikes and assured us no further action was contemplated. That’s BS, the only purpose of which is to sucker congress into allowing a first step into the war. Once that step’s taken and, inevitably, fails, the Mahdi will say we have to “support the troops” and go all the way in on the side of Al Quadea and the Muslim Brotherhood. Then it’s off to the races.


81 posted on 08/31/2013 6:19:14 AM PDT by libstripper (])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

He’s only talking about a “limited,, narrow attack” because he knows that’s the only way he can get the war started. Then, when that inevitably fails and Assad gives him the rigid digit, he’ll say we have to “support the troops” and go in all the way, just as he planned and wanted from the get go. The part of Kerry’s speech where he denounced Assad s a monster almost as bad as Hitler, without using Hitler’s name, was a dead giveaway as to where the Mahdi intends to take us.


82 posted on 08/31/2013 6:33:06 AM PDT by libstripper (])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

In my personal stinky opinion, I could not care any less if we hit either side in Syria — it’s evil vs evil-er and the world would be a better place with fewer moose-limbs. And yes, I’ll paint the entire region with a broad-brush until they reform their homicidal-maniac breeding religion (bottom-up or top-down, no preference).

The only reservation I have is that 0bama will just poke the beast with a stick and piss it off, rather than *finally* setting the example by pounding them relentlessly until we either run out of munitions and/or they lack the means or will to retaliate.

It’s probably a good thing I’m not in charge...


83 posted on 08/31/2013 6:50:06 AM PDT by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

What you say is, alas, plausible.

But, I have taken comfort in one thing. In the past, dictators intent on expanding through war have built up their militaries. Obama has done the opposite. He may very well want to lose (how treasonous is that) in the cause of setting up a caliphate, but that’s so devious he’d have to be a very smart, farsighted planner.

I give him and his cabal a high rating for skill in a legalistic, destructive community organizing sort of way, but they are complete babes in the land of military planning.


84 posted on 08/31/2013 6:51:23 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

While I have little hope that Obama will get the impeachment he deserves, I would think many Democrats are beginning to have their doubts about Dear Leader. The growing unpopularity of Obamacare and now Obama committing US forces for some highly unpopular mission in Syria without Congressional authorization or even support of allies or the UN, should give Democrats up for re-elction in 2014 a lot of apprehension.


85 posted on 08/31/2013 7:22:19 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Keep in mind the date and legislative rationale behind the War Powers Resolution:
1973, and the Congress set forth in the act that an executive could act only
because of a national emergency
following an attack upon the United States.

The ten years of fighting in Vietnam was begun in earnest following the Gulf of Tonkin resolution.
The WPR does not contemplate, IMHO, an imprudent CICh squeezing off a cruise missile (or a few dozen missiles) just because—like Henry VIII and his death warrants—he feels like doing it.

Go ahead, Barry—make our day you POS.


86 posted on 08/31/2013 7:31:24 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Bolton and a few others who are “in the know” have said similar. Looks like one of the few things Zero has done that aren’t impeachable...


87 posted on 08/31/2013 7:50:55 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

Brave Congress.

Like hell.


88 posted on 08/31/2013 8:15:39 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

And if Zer0 is “impeached and removed”...just WHO stands next in line to take his sorry-assed place......hmmmmmmmmmmmmm???? Dear God, please do not let that happen!! :-(


89 posted on 08/31/2013 8:36:38 AM PDT by soozla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
O’blowhard may be walking America into WWIII. It would be a travesty if WWIII was started to message the ego of an impostor with little man syndrome. Attacking Syria will do nothing to change the fact that Berry is a puny little prick in every way imaginable.
90 posted on 08/31/2013 8:48:39 AM PDT by peeps36 (I'm Not A Racist, I Hate Douchebags f All Colors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mosesdapoet

What better way to cover up Bengahzi, Fast and furious, IRS, Wind and Solar panel gate, NSA spying on US, Over-riding the constittution?


A lapdog, sycophantic, press and congress who treats these issues as if they don’t exist?


91 posted on 08/31/2013 8:52:41 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

92 posted on 08/31/2013 8:55:17 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (This post coming to you today, from behind the Camelskin Curtain. Not the Iron or Bamboo Curtain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

More wishful thinking. There are not enough cojones in the house or senate to do the right thing. The only cure is to go 1776 on them.


93 posted on 08/31/2013 9:03:44 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
Race card already being played.

The Race card expired on 1/20/09 and is non-renewable.

94 posted on 08/31/2013 9:06:13 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey
He will simply disband the Congress, impose martial law and declare himself President for life. And his media butt buddies will all fall in line to kiss his a$$.

Then we go 1776 on him, his minions, his supporters and his media accomplices.

95 posted on 08/31/2013 9:09:45 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama
Is there anyone in the military that can tell the president NO?

Well as a matter of fact, there is, he is currently in Leavenworth.

We executed a few NAZIs after WW II for saying they were only following orders.

The UCMJ absolutely demands that you only follow lawful orders, problem is you will stand Courts Martial and it will then be up to a gutless bunch of political officers to decide if the orders were lawful. Ask Terry Lakin.

96 posted on 08/31/2013 9:26:10 AM PDT by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator
When the Democrat delegates booed the decision to revise the God-less platform stance of the Democrat party, I thought it was a Biblical moment, still do.

Do a little poll among your Democratic friends, I doubt that 10% of them will believe that actually happened.

Sad thing is most Democrats are more Conservative that liberal, but they vote for the Commies anyway.

97 posted on 08/31/2013 9:33:18 AM PDT by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
The only side rooting for our Idiot in Chief is the Muslim Brotherhood/Al Qaeda. That tells you all you need to know.
98 posted on 08/31/2013 9:37:35 AM PDT by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peeps36

Yeah, it looks like Ezekiel 38 could be a type of WWIII. And with Russia and Iran potentially involved, this could get really funky really fast.


99 posted on 08/31/2013 10:01:03 AM PDT by F15Eagle (1Jn4:15;5:4-5,11-13;Mt27:50-54;Mk15:33-34;Jn3:17-18,6:69,11:25,14:6,20:31;Ro10:8-11;1Tm2:5-6;Ti3:4-7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins
Does anyone seriously believe the Kenyan Communist will be impeached? With the Dems in control of the Senate? The large herd of stinking RINO's on the other side of the aisle? The media acting as Obama's principal propaganda organ?

Get real. The fact that a small portion of the Left has now joined some conservatives in criticizing the black bastard over Syria is only entertaining but has no political significance.

100 posted on 08/31/2013 10:32:43 AM PDT by pierrem15 (Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson