Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It is time for the Tea Party to become a political party
The Washington Times ^ | September 4, 2013 | Judson Phillips

Posted on 09/05/2013 8:41:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last
To: truth_seeker
"Splitting the conservative vote. What a wonderful, constructive idea."

2000, Bush narrowly beats Gore in the Electoral College. 2006, Democrats win both the House and Senate. 2008, McCain loses to Obama, 2012, Romney loses to Obama. Ever hear the Einstein quote about insanity?

101 posted on 09/06/2013 1:14:42 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I aim to raise a million plus for Gov. Palin. What'll you do?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Ok, so somehow I got two replies started and posted the wrong one (what I get for trying to read/reply on FR while doing a bunch of other stuff.) Here’s what I ended to post, just my personal opinion:

Michael Farris is President of Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) and Founder and Chancellor of Patrick Henry College. I have TONS of respect for him, he is a constitutional scholar, has argued cases in front of the Supreme Court and a leader with a lot of clout within the homeschooling community. See link for a more complete description.

I wanted to take his online course on Constititutional Law this semester, and get my college freshman daughter to take it, but we were both too busy, her with other classes and me with homeschooling my other teens, but the course looks great. Hope we can take it on another occasion.

Farris is really helping educate the next generation and develop leaders who understand what our constitution means and how we can restore it, while also directly involved in constitutional cases regarding religious liberty, etc. While I don’t recognize the other leaders directly, their vitae’s look excellent and I think if Michael Harris brought them on board he would have vetted them carefully. I will definitely support this group.

http://www.conventionofstates.com/welcome-leadership-team


102 posted on 09/06/2013 1:16:40 PM PDT by boxlunch (Psalm 46)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

It’s right across the river. But infested with Democrats. Both houses.


103 posted on 09/06/2013 1:19:48 PM PDT by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: boxlunch
If wiki is half accurate, his Patrick Henry College appears to be an outpost of civilization. I like this:

As of early 2007, the college has a 100% acceptance rate among graduates who have applied to law school.

I admire those who homeschool. Good on ya!

104 posted on 09/06/2013 1:24:14 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To restore the 10th Amendment, repeal the 17th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

BTW, here is their position on how representation would be handled, which was a big subject of debate on one of the threads a couple of weeks ago. This is the only method which makes any sense to me.

I don’t know who has the authority to say this is the way it will be and no other but that needs to be defined before going it.


•All voting would be on the one-state, one-vote rule, just as the original constitutional convention. (And which is the only possible rule when the members of the convention are the states and not the delegates). http://www.conventionofstates.com/take-action-0


105 posted on 09/06/2013 1:27:01 PM PDT by boxlunch (Psalm 46)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: boxlunch
I printed out their Case for the Convention of the States pdf. I don't see how the convention could vote any other way than by states.

The “One man, one vote” concept imposed on the states is one of many outrages from scotus.

I gotta run.

106 posted on 09/06/2013 1:34:11 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To restore the 10th Amendment, repeal the 17th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
The tea party is already a viable political party; it controls the republican party.

I don't recall anyone in the Tea Party rushing to nominate Mitt Romney, or to line up behind Karl Rove, whose allies still control the RNC.

107 posted on 09/06/2013 1:37:51 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Army dad. And damned proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Form a conservative political party separate from the current RINO Party? Yes. I’m ready! Let’s roll.


108 posted on 09/06/2013 2:12:04 PM PDT by Ron H.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The same thing can be said about third-party Presidential runs. They never work. Eugene Debs. Theodore Roosevelt. Robert La Follette. Strom Thurmond. George Wallace. Ross Perot. Ralph Nader. When has one of them ever emerged victorious?


109 posted on 09/06/2013 6:13:49 PM PDT by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
I’d like to see it called, The Taxpayer Party.

An EXCELLENT name. What we need is someone like Pain or Cruz to initiate it. Leadership is everything.

110 posted on 09/06/2013 6:20:27 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile
The same thing can be said about third-party Presidential runs. They never work. Eugene Debs. Theodore Roosevelt. Robert La Follette. Strom Thurmond. George Wallace. Ross Perot. Ralph Nader. When has one of them ever emerged victorious?

Whigs were saying the same thing in the 1850s. When was the last time you saw a Whig candidate on a ballot for President?
111 posted on 09/06/2013 7:01:24 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
Splitting the conservative vote. What a wonderful, constructive idea.

We haven't had a conservative Republican on the Presidential ballot since 1984. A vote for a liberal with an (R) next to their name is still a vote for a liberal, no matter how you spin it.

Any Republicans who blindly vote straight-ticket going forward are selling out their country to the liberals.
112 posted on 09/06/2013 7:06:05 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

bump


113 posted on 09/06/2013 7:08:45 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

First thing: the new party, whatever it calls itself, should VOLUNTARILY commit to term limits: one term for the Senate, one term for the House. Term limits for state and local government should be agreed to also.

These gentlemen seem sincere, however, once in Washington, the temptation is overwhelming and the reward, too great. How many politicians will turn down the chance at becoming a millionaire for doing nothing but voting yes or no? They can set their families up for generations just by cutting a deal with the farmers, or the manufacturers, or the solar industry, or the oil and gas guys, or the unions, et al.

POWER AND MONEY GET THEM ALL, SOONER OR LATER. We need Cincinnatus and George Washington: Men who do their job for a specific period of time, then go back to the farm. We need citizens to do this, not more CAREER POLITICIANS.


114 posted on 09/07/2013 4:06:29 AM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC_Pete

A party that sends people to the Senate with only one term will get very little done there - remember, committee seats are based on length of time on office.


115 posted on 09/07/2013 6:21:40 PM PDT by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

But at least you would have a real discussion of issues and representatives that will say, “No. No way in hell. And don’t ask me again.”

Incumbency is the source of corruption of the entire system.


116 posted on 09/07/2013 6:35:04 PM PDT by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson