Posted on 09/20/2013 4:29:03 AM PDT by spirited irish
Sorry, FRiend, but I’m not going to debate your article.
***Because it shows you to be a freeping liar. And a troll, and, now, a confirmed heretic.
There’s no good reason for any freeper who celebrates the birth of Jesus as God incarnate to listen to your heresy.
Without doubt, those religious authorities believed Jesus said enough to deserve death, but there is no indisputable evidence that Jesus actually claimed to be God Himself.
***You haven’t shown enough historical scholarship on this thread to weigh the evidence of water being wet, let alone this issue. You’re simply a heretic pushing your idealogical agenda, and it was probably a mistake for Spirited Irish not to have posted this as an ecumenical thread. Heck, even as an open thread on the religious forum would have thrown out all your open ended heresies. Get lost, troll. Double loser: Troll and Heretic.
None of those “proof-texts” are indisputable.
***Sure they are, to anyone who believes in Jesus and isn’t pushing the heresy of the denial of His deity. You HAVE to deny ALL those so-called proof texts in order to push your ridiculous and unfounded heresy. Jesus warned against false teachers like yourself, calling you sons of the devil, vipers, snakes, wolves in sheep’s clothing. As the title of this thread says, it is a damnable heresy. That means that God DAMNS You for pushing such heresy. You are legitimately labelled a God Damned Heretic.
So really, what is your problem, FRiend?
***My problem with a heretic like you is the same issue that Jesus had with you. Jesus warned against false teachers like yourself, calling you sons of the devil, vipers, snakes, wolves in sheep’s clothing. As the title of this thread says, it is a damnable heresy. That means that God DAMNS You for pushing such heresy. You are legitimately labelled a God Damned Heretic.
Your alleged interest in history
***It’s all here for any lurker to see. I was posting about historicity and putting up with your garbage accusations about it being religious. Finally I got fed up with your idealogical agenda, looked into what was driving it, and realized it fit exactly with what the thread title had already called out as damnable heresy. You are a damnable heretic. And a troll. The only thing left to do is to call the Viking Kitties and let them play with you as a troll until you get zotted. But in your case, you’re a doubly despicable troll because you’re pushing heresy as well. Get lost, heretic.
You’re not a nice person.
***And neither was Jesus when He was confronting false teachers like you, heretic. Was Christ not being Christ-like when he properly labelled you as a viper, the son of your father the devil?
Your ratio of insult to serious argument is running near 100% to zero.
***That is what happens when you start posting religious garbage. You turned the discussion on historicity into bowlsheet by your projections, and then by pushing simple heresy onto this forum. I told you I wasn’t here to discuss religion but you had to push it, and now you’re exposed as a freeping heretic. You are a spiritually sickening person. You deserve such a ratio. You don’t listen to serious argument and you insult this forum with your heresy, so your ratio is an exact match to what you have accused, you damnable heretic.
These are not controversial ideas,
***The hell they aren’t, heretic.
Kevmo from his 2008 link:
***Too late to try to go back and have legitimate discussion because you’re exposed as a heretic. You can make a pig into sausage but you can’t make a sausage into a pig. You turned it into sausage by pushing your historical-fantasy heresy.
I mention him only because I consider his work “pure history”
***Of course you “consider” it to be that, but the guy is a pure heretic and his idealogy matches your own. Simple, straightforward heresy, just in time for Christmas. You are a sick son of the devil, a viper, a heretic.
Obviously, you had no serious intention of discussion history and every intention of venting you bile on somebody you could label “heretic”.
***It’s all on this thread for any lurker to see where I started and where your heretical projections pushed the discussion.
Sorry, FRiend, but there’s no “evidence”.
***According to your idealogically driven, revisionist viewpoint. Which is now properly identified as heresy.
1864 is a reply to your ridiculous post 1859, where you cannot even tell the difference between a historical observation and a religious item of faith.
Get lost, troll. If this were even an open thread in the religious forum, your earlier crap would have been deleted and you wouldn’t have been allowed to push your heresy.
In no place does the NT indisputably say: “Jesus is God”.
***That’s because when it does say it, you dispute it. That is the way of the heretic.
Without doubt, those religious authorities believed Jesus said enough to deserve death, but there is no indisputable evidence that Jesus actually claimed to be God Himself.
***You can dispute whatever you want. That ACT of DISputing such solid historical and faith evidence is properly labelled as heresy because it is a simple denial of the deity of Christ, just as the thread says. Jesus called such false teachers as you, “vipers”. No doubt you would call Christ out as being un-Christlike.
In fact, no Christian denies what the Bible actually says on this subject.
***Then believe what the bible says, rather than push your heresy onto its backdrop.
FRiend, the truth of this matter is that Kevmo wouldn’t know real history if it walked up and slapped him in the face.
***Heretic, feel free to push this bowlsheet on the historical thread I posted.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2056400/posts
Go ahead, troll. Heretic.
Our Founders did not want people like Kevmo and mean-spirited irish going around calling good people “heretics”, and neither do I. Especially on Free Republic!
***But Jesus Himself told us to be like Him. And he called false teachers such as yourself “vipers” and “sons of your father the devil”. By exposing your heresy I’m doing what Christ calls us to do. No doubt you’ll be saying that Christ was not being Christ-like when He did such things.
I see you are no longer in denial that you’re a troll. At least that’s a sign of progress.
If you’re gonna be tellin’ me what to do and not to do, then I’m rightfully telling you to stop being a troll and a heretic on this website. But your heart is so hardened that I already know what you’re gonna do.
No, Crossan is a historian
***He’s a simple heretic, pushing his own idealogical excrement onto history. Such heresy catches weak fish like you in its net because you agree with it and don’t want to submit to Christ’s authority as God Himself.
Few of these specific details qualify as “history”, they are all religious beliefs.
***There it is again, for all to see. When the gospels record a piece of history, in this case an exchange between Jesus and a crowd, there’s nothing to disqualify it as historical when it’s just describing mundane facts and no miracles. But you, for the 2nd time in this thread, have labelled historical observations contained in the gospels as a religious belief.
You are a joke, a brojoke as a historian. No wonder why you drifted into heresy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.