Posted on 09/20/2013 4:29:03 AM PDT by spirited irish
FRiend, I get how sick your mind is.
Please get help.
No, BroJoe is far from guilty of analysis, penetrating or otherwise. I was speaking of other posters to this thread, of the opportunity provided for expression of their analysis for edification of readers.
Actually, you may not qualify as a heretic. Over these several years of watching you troll on FR, I don’t think you’ve ever really identified yourself as a christian. One can’t expect a jew to push anything but judaism, and a moslem to push islam, and in your case antichristian atheism & scientism to push your godless garbage. But at least if you do not sidle along christians and call yourself one in the hopes of twisting it around, then you are at least not a heretic.
I'd be curious to know if anybody here knows if Kevmo's apparently insane rantings might have some basis in fact.
Does Free Republic's religion forum routinely delete or ban posters who confess the Bible but not necessarily every creed ever written?
FRiend, it doesn't say it.
What it does say is open to reasonable interpretation, by reasonable people.
I'm sorry that you're not one.
Calm down, FRiend.
***Shut up, HEretic.
if you detect “heresy” and can’t deal with it in a reasonable, civilized & FRiendly way,
***Hmmmm.... let’s see... how did Jesus handle false teachers in His day? He called them vipers, wolves in sheep’s clothing, sons of the devil. He wasn’t calm. So you expect more out of a freeper than you do from the God of the Universe Who lived as a man when He came down in the form of Jesus. Ok, I “get” it. You’re simply a God Damned Heretic. Now you’re a butt hurt Heretic. Maybe when you have a beer on christmas you’ll enjoy it but you’ll still be a heretic. Or do you accuse Jesus of being “unreasonable” or “uncivilized” when he properly condemned heretics like you?
Just as soon as you follow up on the things I have asked you to do, heretic.
Please quote to prove your claim.
Please post quote which says any such thing.
***Oh, aren’t you the precious little heretic troll? You flatly state, “Sorry, FRiend, but I’m not going to debate your article.” And you obviously haven’t even spent the 3 seconds it takes to click on the article, or you wouldn’t be saying many of the things you have. They PROVE you wrong. Now you want me to play fetch because you don’t want to spend 3 seconds clicking on the article that proves you wrong. So now you’re just a lazy heretic who likes to play games as a troll.
I understand that you need help, and you need to get over this, FRiend.
***I understand that God Himself calls false teachers like you “vipers”. And worse. I’m only calling you a heretic. You would Tell God Incarnate that He needs to get over it!!! How else would you tell Jesus that He isn’t being Christlike when He confronts false teachers?
Kevmo: “You are legitimately labelled a God Damned Heretic.”
FRiend, I get how sick your mind is.
Please get help.
***Your sickness is of spiritual origin. Jesus properly calls false teachers like you “sons of your father the devil”, and you would comment on how sick His mind is. You came here to discuss religion and now you’re getting plenty of it, so now you’re complaining about getting butt hurt because you’re properly identified as a God Damned Heretic. It is actually quite rare to be able to put those 3 words together, God Damned Heretic, in a context where it is real. You really are a heretic. And God really does Damn you.
I’ll play fetch just as soon as you do things like spending 3 seconds clicking on a link or 2 that I’ve posted. But you refuse because... it disproves this incredible heresy that you’re pushing. So I’m done with your troll game playing, and I’m simply doing what God did when He ran across false teachers like you, Heretic.
What it does say is open to reasonable interpretation, by reasonable people.
***The troll repeats his argument. You are not a reasonable person, you are a heretic trying to push a damnable heresy onto FR. God has very harsh things to say about spiritual A$$#()[3s like you. You would put yourself in the position of telling God to be reasonable, to calm down, that His Word doesn’t say what it does, that He’s not loving when He says identifies false teachers like you to be vipers. And it would appear that you would expect even more from a freeper than from God Himself. You’re ridiculous.
Well, by post #1667, YHAOS has already accused you of being a troll. None of those 4D’s in action would have survived.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3069049/posts?page=1667#1667
“What is your problem, exactly?”
The four D’s in action . . . ducking, dancing, dodging, and discharging (great gaseous displays).
****************************
Post #1680 would get deleted
Sure, but you seem to forget
***Religion mod would call that “making it personal”.
that Romans were the masters, and Jews their subjects.
There is no possible way — zero, zip, nada — that Romans would crucify anybody for the “crime” of blasphemy.
***by the way, here you were simply arguing over & over again against something that I didn’t say, if anything it was a simple typo.
*****************************
Post 1685 would have been removed.
YHAOS: “Miz boop, spirited, kevmo, and several others have spent an inordinate amount of their valuable time (especially boop and spirited) explaining their ideas.
Their reward has been your disrespect and contemptuous dismissal of their sincerity...”
***YHAOS is correct here, and those posts where your disrespect and contempt came out would have been deleted.
But Ms irish’s accusations against Freemasons, especially our Founders’ Freemasonry, are not serious.
***Here the mod would say you’re projecting and mind reading, not allowed.
Instead, they are the product of a mis-informed and malice-intending mind.
***the RM would definitely delete the post due to this statement. Such provocations are not allowed even on open religion threads.
**********************************
Post 1691, mind reading is not allowed
FRiend, I know that’s what you really intended to say,
*******************
Post 1680 would definitely get removed and probably get you a warning from the mod.
Yes, I “get” that you wish to focus, focus, focus on the guilt of the Jews, but I don’t see it that way.
********************************
Post #1790
What is your problem, FRiend, do you think I’m making this up?
***Such hostility aint allowed. Would have been removed.
*************
Post #1734, you push Crossan. Since he’s a heretic, such garbage wouldn’t be allowed on caucus threads, but perhaps the religion mod would allow it on open threads.
************
Post #1740, making it personal. Probably would get removed
This is a major issue with Kevmo, who seems pretty confused on the subject.
***********************
Somewhere in there you are pushing freemasonry garbage. That stuff wouldn’t be allowed on caucus threads. Probably would be allowed on open threads.
***********************
Post 1730 would get removed. Making it personal, hostility.
What is your problem, FRiend, do you think I’m making this up?
Did you ever read it all yourself?
***************************
Post 1731, you start ratcheting up the hostility and mind reading. Woulda been removed.
Once again, you wish us to forget who was the master and who were his subjects.
***By the way, here you start just being a plain troll, because you just repeat the same thing over and over again. But apparently trolling is allowed on open religion threads, not caucus threads.
*************************
In post #1805 you attribute your own theory to a fact of history. It is likely that the religion mod would not allow such obvious falsehoods, especially when accompanied by hostility.
So why you continue to deny the obvious truth of this matter is beyond me.
**********************
By post #1826, your sarcasm is dripping and it’s likely that most of your posts after that would be removed.
FRiend, you are deeply, deeply confused about the difference between “history” and “religious faith”.
Your religious faith drives you to justify what the Bible says, and to ignore all other data.
***Such statements are typically deleted and if this happens more than a couple of times, the religion mod asks you to leave the thread.
******************
So by this time in the thread, your dander is up, you’re in peacock projection mode, you often troll by saying the same thing over and over and over and so on. Up to this point, my hostility towards you is almost nonexistent and eventually I notice that you’re idealogically driven, and then I notice that you’re pushing heresy. The blame for the tone of this exchange between you & me is at your feet. I take responsibility for the tone between me & tacticalogic, a long term troll on FR.
Go ahead and log onto some caucus or ecumenical threads to see how many of your hostile posts get deleted. Maybe the religion mod allows some of your unhistorical heresy on some threads, maybe not. But by the 1820’s on this thread, you’re a troll, a heretic, and have set the tone for a brouhaha.
Seriously, has anyone ever seen behavior like Kevmo's on Free Republic?
Is this normal & routine response to disagreements on FR religion forums?
What about News Activism threads?
The one previous time, years ago, I can recall a buzz-saw like Kevmo, (totally different subject) in the end, the mods deleted the whole thread.
But in that case there had been other posters, equally ugly, though somewhat less persistent.
So that whole thread was a mess.
In this case we have Kevmo going total nuts, while everyone else seems still highly reasonable...
Does anyone have a suggestion, beyond the obvious of refusing to respond -- which I will do, in due time -- but just wondering first if anyone has a suggestion to help poor Kevmo out?
Kevmo: "I see you are no longer in denial that you’re a troll. At least that’s a sign of progress."
FRiend, I fully acknowledge your total insanity, and I deny all your accusations, categorically.
Kevmo, you are a wolf howling at the moon, a howl which strikes fear in brave men & women, arouses us from sleep and arms us against your coming onslaught.
But there is no onslaught, because you are toothless, and insane.
So all you've really done, FRiend, is disturb some otherwise sound sleep...
Get help.
From spirited irish's article: "John identifies antichrists, in this case clergy who serve the devil rather than Christ, sequentially.
First, like Bultmann, Teilhard de Chardin, Robert Funk, Paul Tillich, and John Shelby Spong, they specifically deny the living, personal Holy Trinity in favor of Gnostic pagan, immanent or Eastern pantheist conceptions."
FRiends, I'm starting to wonder from this if maybe Kevmo is spirited irish's sock-puppet, hired-on to do her dirty work?
Would that be a fair conclusion?
Is Kevmo's job here to make certain no post of BroJoeK's goes unanswered -- in the most vile, murderous language imaginable?
And this, we all agree(??), is the appropriate response in an FR "News Activism" forum to disputes over historical interpretations of the Bible?
I'm just askin'.
Bookmarking this thread for when someone asks me why I no longer call myself Christian.
FRiend, Crossan is a historian, period.
Whether he is also still Christian (he was a Catholic priest), I don't know, but there are only two possibilities:
Just because, FRiend, you don't like Crossan's historical analyses, doesn't make them "heretical".
Indeed, since you've never read even one word of Crossan's work, what you don't like is what you've heard second, or third-hand about it, evidence on which no possible court in the entire known Universe would convict anybody of "heresy".
Crossan is a historian, not heretic.
Kevmo is an orthodox believer who wouldn't know real history if it walked up and slapped him in the face.
Is this normal & routine response to disagreements on FR religion forums?
***Sure, they’ve been quite raucous in the past. That’s why the religion mod had to clamp down. But this article isn’t in the religion forum, so your trolling was allowed, then your hostility, then your mind reading, and even your heresy. None of your garbage would be allowed onto a caucus thread.
FRiends, I’m starting to wonder from this if maybe Kevmo is spirited irish’s sock-puppet, hired-on to do her dirty work?
***Hah hah hah. Isn’t it just like someone who reads his own theory into history to come up with a conspiracy theory? You hear that, Spirited? I’m your sock puppet. And he doubts MY sanity! Oh well, Jesus’s sanity was doubted as well. So, if someone logs onto a thread titled “Falling Stars, Damnable Heresy, and the Spirit of Evolution”, then pushes a damnable heresy, is such a troll expected to complain about being butt hurt after a spanking? Was Jesus being “reasonable” when he labelled false teachers “sons of the devil”? Or does brojoke uphold Jesus and freepers to a standard even higher than God Himself holds? We’ll never know, because brojoke won’t answer this question honestly, along with dozens of others he has blithely gone past in his quest to push a heresy onto FR.
FRiend, Crossan is a historian, period.
***HERETIC, Crossan is as much a historian as Joseph Goebels.
Is this normal & routine response to disagreements on FR religion forums?
***Colofornian, you were battling heresy even when there was a republican presidential candidate involved. Perhaps you think we’re supposed to be “reasonable” with heretics?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.