Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama flips 2011 script in new debt ceiling fight with Republicans (Hussein's 'flexibility'?)
The Hill ^ | 10/06/13 | Amie Parnes

Posted on 10/06/2013 4:23:34 AM PDT by Libloather

President Obama is taking a completely different tack in this year’s budget fight than in 2011, when talks with congressional leaders ended with him at a low point in his presidency.

Administration officials and White House allies argue Obama learned from his mistakes in that round, and that this underscores his decision to not negotiate with Republicans over raising the debt ceiling and ending the government shutdown.

“Nope, nope, nope,” one senior administration official said when asked if Obama would bend on the latest round of debt ceiling negotiations. “He’s not budging. Not this time.”

“We took John Boehner at his word that there was serious interest in negotiating a grand bargain and he wasn’t able to do any of that,” the senior official explained. “So let’s just say we learned from our mistakes.

The official also argued that Obama in 2011 thought Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) was capable of delivering his conference to a deal. Now he doesn’t.

“And the president especially learned the lesson of what John Boehner was capable of last time,” the official added. “He’s much more skeptical.”

Aides and Democrats close to the White House say this year’s dynamics are a far cry from 2011. Though Obama has stumbled in his second term — Gallup on Friday said his approval rating stood at an anemic 41 percent — the president doesn’t face the pressure of running for another term.

In 2011, Obama had one eye on the debt talks and another on his reelection, and this gave leverage to Republicans.

A key demand of the White House’s that year was that Republicans extend the debt ceiling to a point beyond the 2012 election so that it would not be an issue.

House Republicans were also at a stronger point in 2011. They were less than a year removed from their stunning electoral success in 2010, when they stripped the gavel from then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) hands and gained 63 seats in the House.

The House GOP lost seats in 2012 as Obama coasted to reelection, and Democrats have been happy to point out that their party won 1 million more votes than Republican House candidates that year, who retained their majority in part because of redrawn congressional district lines.

Those close to the White House who were involved in the first round of Obama's debt ceiling negotiations argue the difference between 2011 and 2013 stems more from the president's reelection than his need to get reelected two years ago.

“It’s less that he’s not running again and more that he was reelected,” said one former senior administration official, who was involved in the first debt ceiling talks. “I think the reelection put everything on the table, healthcare, government spending. The reelection was a referendum on the direction the country was going in.

“That’s not lost on the president,” the former official continued. “Not one bit.”

They also argue that experience, and not circumstances is the real reason why Obama was seemingly willing to make concessions in 2011, but isn’t this time.

“I think the biggest difference between him then and now is that he has some wisdom about what a negotiation would produce,” another former senior administration official said. “He’s not going to let those guys fool him again.”

Allies of Obama who grumbled that he gave away too much in 2011 are happy with the change, and say they believe the White House means it when it says the president won’t negotiate this time.

“Sometime between 2011 and now there’s been a clear message that we’re not going to see a replay of 2011,” one former senior administration official said.

The former official added that the 2011 playbook is “not acceptable” to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and that Obama has reached the same conclusion as well.

“I think he realized he’d have a lot harder time selling it to Harry Reid than he did in 2011,” the former official said.

Republicans have blasted Obama for refusing to negotiate, and Republican strategist Ron Bonjean said Obama risks “painting himself into a corner and overplaying his hand by not really sitting down with Speaker Boehner and hammering out a deal.

“When Democrats lead the White House and Senate, Obama will damage the image of his party if he simply refuses to run the country,” Bonjean said. He predicted that the “pressure will mount on Obama to negotiate with Republicans if the government is closed and until the debt ceiling is lifted.”

This is particularly true, Bonjean suggested, now that the GOP message seems to be “changing away from Obamacare to a broader discussion over deficit reduction on the debt ceiling.”

Also, while Obama doesn’t have to worry about an election, he must contend with his legacy, especially with few tangible deliverables in his second term.

The White House believes Republicans will be blamed for the shutdown and a default, if that happens. But Obama would then become the first president to have a default on his watch.

Still, observers close to the White House say the president—who has expressed downright exasperation at the stalemate-- feels like he’s in the right on this fight. And they can see it more and more with each passing day of the government shutdown and as the debt ceiling looms.

“There’s no indignation like righteous indignation and I think he feels completely righteously indignant,” one former senior administration official said. “He’s got that in spades right now.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; barrycades; ceiling; deathpanels; debt; flexibility; hussein; obamacare; zerocare
“Nope, nope, nope,”

10-year-old. But that was all brought out during the vetting process - eh?

1 posted on 10/06/2013 4:23:35 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

They don’t know the difference between “righteous indignation” and “petty, spiteful, vindictive, temper tantrum” made dangerous because the The _resident is the Teh Won throwing it. If it was anything more than that, he wouldn’t be enacting petty, vindictive, spiteful closures of non-federally funded parks and memorials which hurt no one so much as vets, or ordering priests, even volunteers, to not say mass etc or face arrest. Who tries to close the ocean, for pity’s sake?!

Those actions are pure petty tyranny, even as he’s trying to enact a real tyranny-a coup. He’s telling the House that they’re just there to rubberstamp whatever he wants, even of a majority of Americans don’t want it.


2 posted on 10/06/2013 4:31:34 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Boehner is onboard with increasing the debt ceiling even if he has to count on Democrat votes to do it.


3 posted on 10/06/2013 4:36:03 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What distorted views of reality and history he operates on. The fact checking and balance in the article are confined to one line: his current approval rating is 41%.


4 posted on 10/06/2013 4:40:18 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The boy king doesnt give a damn what The People want and why should he? He has amassed an enormous fortune far beyond what the typical president has in the past, he has a wait staff on call 24/7, armed security 24/7, and can play golf all day or whisk away to anyplace he wants to in the world ON THE TAXPAYER’s DIME...


5 posted on 10/06/2013 4:44:07 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

6 posted on 10/06/2013 5:16:40 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather; mrsmel
It is becoming increasingly clear, as Mark Levin says, that Obama wanted the government to shut down, wants the government to stay shut down, wants a crisis of debt default (which need not happen because income is sufficient to pay interest on the debt but which he will contrive to force) so that he can unilaterally usurp Article I borrowing power.

He will justify this putsch of the purse by declaring that he is avoiding a second Great Depression and a worldwide depression at that. No doubt he will attempt to unilaterally extend his extraconstitutional history of spending and amending laws as he goes along, all the while claiming justification by the national/international financial emergency caused by the Republicans.

This will cause an uproar but he is confident that the media will back him and there is no danger of impeachment while he controls the Senate.

This is not a question of Obama's arrogance but of his ideology. He, of course, is possessed of the hubris which tells him that his ideology is uniquely valid and that hubris causes him to despise the Constitution and our free markets. The point is not to waste time psychoanalyzing Obama but to predict his behavior by analyzing his ideology.

In a way it is our very good fortune that Ted Cruz and Mike Lee precipitated this crisis over Obamacare rather than remaining passive on the promise of John Boehner and Mitch McConnell the fight over the issue of the debt ceiling. This not just because those promises by these two are illusory but because the Obamacare shutdown has smoked Obama out and provides cover to the Republicans to extend the debt while maintaining a shutdown in pursuit of Obamacare.

The problem is, as always, we cannot rely on our own troops to remain steadfast. But it seems that they of that we had better alert the country about Obama's unconstitutional intentions and we really should devise a strategy to deal with it. The most obvious strategy is, as I have described, to continue steadfast over Obamacare but extend the debt ceiling for a very limited time. Please note that Obama is insisting on a 13 month extension of the debt ceiling and will not otherwise negotiate. This is further evidence of his desire to force an emergency. At least the Republicans should keep the issue alive with a very short extension of the debt ceiling while depriving him of the justification for stealing the power of the purse from Congress.

I expect to receive some criticism for even consenting to extension of the debt ceiling but I await a better strategy to emerge.


7 posted on 10/06/2013 5:17:15 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Your analysis yields the inescapable truth. The shut down and the various drastic special enforcement of inconveniences was a premeditated act following very specific and vastly detailed plan.

Once again as in the IRS crimes and the James Rosen crimes and in the Dr Ben Carson crimes, the federal government is used by the treacherous tyrant to cudgel America into submission.


8 posted on 10/06/2013 5:23:19 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Once again, The Hill is pimping for the President.


9 posted on 10/06/2013 5:27:30 AM PDT by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


10 posted on 10/06/2013 8:40:26 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's no coincidence that some "conservatives" echo the hard left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson