Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reid Wont Say If Hes Read All 10,535 Pages of Obamacare Regs
Cybercast News Service ^ | October 9, 2013 - 6:11 PM | Penny Starr

Posted on 10/09/2013 11:11:37 PM PDT by Olog-hai

When asked by CNSNews.com whether he has read all 10,535 pages of final Obamacare regulations published so far in the Federal Register, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) would not answer. …

CNSNews.com later sent several emails to Reid’s communications director repeating the question of whether Reid had read the 10,535 pages of final Obamacare regulations that the administration has thus far published. He did not respond. According to the voice mail recording at Reid’s office, Reid’s staff is not checking voice mails or emails. …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: harryreid; obamacare; regulations; zerocare

1 posted on 10/09/2013 11:11:37 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Can he even READ?


2 posted on 10/09/2013 11:13:30 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I don’t think Harry has read anything larger than a Gay Green Lantern comic book in the past 50 years.


3 posted on 10/09/2013 11:13:55 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The DemocRAT Pahtay! Spending our grandchildren's future, today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Of course he hasn’t read it.


4 posted on 10/09/2013 11:15:53 PM PDT by kevinm13 (Tim Geithner is a tax cheat. Manmade "Global Warming" is a HOAX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I dont see how they can say a bill is constitutional if it has not been read by the people voting for it.
The whole thing should be voided not to mention many places in the bill it gives the “Secretary” carte blanch to do what ever he or she sees fit.


5 posted on 10/09/2013 11:20:57 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: funfan

And judging by that “Secretary’s” appearance with Jon Stewart, she is a woman with ISSUES. I’d bet money she has “Dominatrix” on her resume.


6 posted on 10/09/2013 11:25:36 PM PDT by ponygirl (Be Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I hear he is busy doing a commercial for Proactive


7 posted on 10/09/2013 11:31:23 PM PDT by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I’m not certain that he’s read the Constitution.


8 posted on 10/09/2013 11:33:59 PM PDT by windsorknot (>>>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: funfan
I dont see how they can say a bill is constitutional if it has not been read by the people voting for it.

More importantly, it is a revenue bill which did not originate in the senate.

Did the Supreme Court decision address this tiny irregularity?

9 posted on 10/09/2013 11:50:34 PM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends; RedMDer; musicman; The Cajun; DJ MacWoW






___________________________________


Now, Please Make Your Donation!

10 posted on 10/09/2013 11:53:00 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius911

No and they did not read the bill either as Justice Scalia I believed said that were not going to read or re do the bill for the congress. I wonder how many lawsuits there are pending on this piece of crap?


11 posted on 10/10/2013 12:03:43 AM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I would say, “Of course not, because no one has read it”, but that may not be true anymore. I’ve heard of some speed readers who were put to the task as a publicity stunt two years ago. But we’re talking just literally reading it, not comprehending all the braided up nuances. I don’t think it was ever created to be understood in any one manner. The law was written so that multiple interpretations would always be possible.


12 posted on 10/10/2013 12:19:48 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

BTW, [;enty of blacks had black slaves in Africa, and now the pimps here in the US have kidnapped girls as their slaves.

I’m pretty sure he has read every directive the mob has sent him, and don’t forget all the offers for real estate.


13 posted on 10/10/2013 12:30:51 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
He hasn't read any of the regulations!
14 posted on 10/10/2013 2:01:50 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The only part he has read is the page that says he does not have to fully comply.


15 posted on 10/10/2013 2:58:00 AM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Every time I see Harry Reid or John McLame I think of the final cabin interior scene from the movie “Shooter”


16 posted on 10/10/2013 3:17:58 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Hey, it means what my people tell me it means.”


17 posted on 10/10/2013 3:38:56 AM PDT by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Read it?

His staff and family (and their brothels in Nevada)
are not even under ObamaCARE/RomneyCARE.


18 posted on 10/10/2013 3:49:19 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The American Medical Association has weighed in on the new health care package.
The Allergists were in favor of scratching it, but the Dermatologists advised not to make any rash moves.
The Gastroenterologists had sort of a gut feeling about it, but the Neurologists thought the Administration had a lot of nerve.
Meanwhile, Obstetricians felt certain everyone was laboring under a misconception, while the Ophthalmologists considered the idea shortsighted.
Pathologists yelled, “Over my dead body!” while the Pediatricians said, “Oh, grow up!”
The Psychiatrists thought the whole idea was madness, while the Radiologists could see right through it.
Surgeons decided to wash their hands of the whole thing and the Internists claimed it would indeed be a bitter pill to swallow.
The Plastic Surgeons opined that this proposal would “put a whole new face on the matter.”
The Podiatrists thought it was a step forward, but the Urologists were pissed off at the whole idea.
Anesthesiologists thought the whole idea was a gas, and those lofty Cardiologists didn’t have the heart to say no.
In the end, the Proctologists won out, leaving the entire decision up to the assholes in Washington.


19 posted on 10/10/2013 3:51:20 AM PDT by Spartan302 (Spartans never quit, they come back later with more warriors. Asymmetrical Warfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

He looked at the pictures does that help??


20 posted on 10/10/2013 3:54:10 AM PDT by bikerman (Obama! if his lips are moving he's lying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spartan302
LOL! :-D
an excellent synopsis, of what's going on.
from the organization (medically speaking :)
...btw; didn't they support 0'Blahblah's DeathCARE disaster???
closing the barn door after the horses/livestock has bolted.

21 posted on 10/10/2013 4:03:54 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income & tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bikerman
what pictures?

22 posted on 10/10/2013 4:05:11 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income & tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson