Posted on 10/15/2013 2:07:29 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
WASHINGTON (CBS DC) In a heated Tuesday interview, Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., talked with CNN host Ashley Banfield about his belief that House Republicans are embarrassing the countrys democratic process.
Rangel, who is a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, said that he believes the Tea Party members of the House are against anything that comes out of these negotiations.
When asked for his reactions to House Republican leaderships provisions, Rangel expressed his frustration with the congressional logjam.
This isnt a question of the House and Senate differing. This is not even a question of Republicans and Democrats differing. This is all about a handful of people who got elected as Republicans that want to bring down our government, said Rangel.
You can see it in the streets, you can see where theyre coming from, and the same way they fought as Confederates they want to bring down the government and reform it.
CNN host Ashley Banfield interrupted Rangel to confirm if he was likening the Tea Party candidates to Civil War Confederates.
Well, I can tell you this, if you look at the states that they control, take a look at the Dixiecrats, see how they went over to Republican Party, Rangel pointed out, although Banfield quickly noted that Michele Bachmann is not from Dixie.
Im telling you one thing, if the Republicans really want to bring the government back, if the Republicans want to make certain that this country maintains its fiscal integrity, all they have to do is to accept the Senate [deal].
Banfield stated that Rangel, despite his deep disagreement with some of the conservative House Republicans, should compromise with his ilk in an effort to make certain that negotiations re-open the government.
She pointed out a Washington Post poll showing that Republicans have a 74 percent disapproval rating, Democrats with 61 percent and President Obama at a 53 percent approval rating for how they are all handling the federal budget negotiations.
Rangel conceded that he believes both parties of Congress are doing a terrible job, but went on to say that regardless of party differences, the integrity of the United States should not be held hostage.
We dont want this for Obama and we dont want it for any president, Rangel insisted. Republicans or conservatives, to put a gun at the presidents head, saying if you dont agree with me politically, were going to take down the United States of America and those countries that depend on our dollar. That is absolutely ridiculous. Its not a compromise. Its a hostage taking.
“”Are you an American and support the Constitution “
I support the constitution, Lincoln didn’t, therefore you don’t.
Lincoln felt that the freemen would be better off returned to Africa or colonies in South America or some such. He didn’t feel that blacks and whites could live together peacefully. Wonder where he got a crazy idea like that?
The Little Dummy Who Cried Racist.
“Emancipation Proclamation said that the slaves were free but did not have the authority to free them didnt it?”
The EP freed nobody. It did not apply to any state or territory that had not seceded, and even then it did not apply to the slaves in those areas of the seceded states that were under federal control. In the states over which there was no federal control there was no legal authority to enforce it. Thus, the EP freed no one.
Delaware still had slaves at the time the EP was passed, though not a great many.
Well Delaware was a border state and technically considered a part of the Union.
Rangel needs to get real...
Actually, Delaware was NOT considered a border state, and it was firmly in the Union camp. Maryland and Kentucky were the accepted Border States, as they did not secede; and arguably Missouri, as well (which was divided on the issue), as it did not secede, either.
They were just forcefully removing barrycades ;)
You have a point about Delaware. Some considered it a border state, and some did not. It was, though, a slave state that did not secede, and it did commit to the Union rather than try to remain neutral. Most consider the Border states to have been neutral; hence, Delaware would not under that criterium be considered a Border state.
Rangel has less credibility than the democrat KKK.
Two months before the end of the Civil War Delaware voted on February 18, 1865 to reject the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution and so voted unsuccessfully to continue slavery beyond the Civil War. Delaware symbolically ratified the amendment on February 12, 190140 years after Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation. Slavery ended in Delaware only when the Thirteenth Amendment took effect in December of 1865. Delaware also rejected the 14th amendment during the Reconstruction Era. It seems that even though Delaware appeared to be in the Union camp it’s sympathies were with the South.
“It seems that even though Delaware appeared to be in the Union camp its sympathies were with the South.”
Funny the way it showed that, eh?
No, the southern democrats threw out the Constitution, seceded, fired the first shot. They removed themselves from any Constitutional rights. Lincoln brought them back under the Constitution. Seems that some like you still support the democrat party’s confederate experiment. The crisis at hand has everything to do with restoring the Constitution and the Republic (yes, that’s Lincoln’s Republic) and has nothing to do with your pathetic lost cause.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.