Posted on 10/17/2013 1:16:18 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
Cute, considering you are a party to this argument. Not so cute mocking disabled children.
I am sure happy neither of you live around me because if you did the cops would feel so neutered that crime would be running amok. I bet you both love the ACLU.
If he would have only said, "Please with sugar on it"?
Being polite to those in government is not the issue here slick.
Hello?
U.S. citizens are not required to kiss the ass's of those in government or call anyone "Sir".
The man committed no stinking crime yet you're all ready to convict this man.
I find you to be very suspicious.
So you’ve been reduced to posting cute pics?
This is what happens when don’t have clue what you’re talking about slick.
One of the nice things about being a law abiding gun owner is that I have less of a need for law enforcement help than a bedwetter like you.
You don't get it...I have no problem with cops when they do their job within the law. But if they mess with me when I am not committing any crime whatsoever, I will make it my life purpose to civilly and or criminally go after them and whatever government agency they happen to work for.
Ya see unlike you I have a real problem with those in government who think they can do whatever they please regardless of what is right or legal.
Unlike you, I have a real deep seated concerns regarding ever escalating widespread government corruption at all levels.
You clearly have no clue here mr. bell.
You want to roll over and kiss their butts, treating them like ruling class royalty instead of public servants while they trash and violate law and the Constitution?
I have no problem with that slick.
The Battle of Athens: Restoring the Rule of Law
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5ut6yPrObw
If a trial has nothing to do with rights then you are accusing the court of being a kangaroo court which is a defining characteristic of a police state.
The citizen has the right to make it personal. The law does not.
Putting aside your inability to write properly, you have yet to put forward any valid evidence that Grisham acted in a “belligerent”, “angry”, or “hostile” manner as you have alleged. In other words, you a slandering the man with false accusations.
The jury has been deliberating for a day and a half
over a charge of “interfering with a police officer”,
or something similar.
Not sure what that means for a verdict one way or the other.
Posted: Friday, October 18, 2013 4:16 pm | Updated: 4:23 pm, Fri Oct 18, 2013.
Hung jury in Grisham case BELTON -- A six-person jury was unable to reach a verdict in the misdemeanor trial of Christopher Grisham, with the trial ending in a hung jury Friday afternoon. Grisham, a U.S. Army master sergeant, was charged with interfering with the duties of a Temple Police officer after his March 16 arrest by Officer Steve Ermis while Grisham and his son, Chris, were on a 10-mile hike for a Boy Scout badge. The elder Grisham carried an AR-15 rifle and a concealed handgun for which he had a permit. Grisham said he was carrying the weapons for protection from feral hogs, coyotes and even a puma that was previously seen in the area.
Post 216.
Update - post 216.
Ping to update - Post 216.
Update Ping - post 216.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.