Skip to comments.
Mandate Debate: Why I Cannot Support Hobby Lobby’s “Religious Freedom” Claim
ReligiousLiberty.TV ^
| 11/27/2013
| Jason Hines
Posted on 11/28/2013 9:49:22 AM PST by ReligiousLibertyTV
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121 next last
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
I’ll pay for your condoms if you pay for my ammunition.
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
Yet another example of the intellectual vapidity of socialism.
3
posted on
11/28/2013 9:52:20 AM PST
by
Ray76
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
“Once again, they are not providing contraception. They are providing an option to have contraception, which the employee will then decide to either use or not use. “
Proving a pay-check does the same thing.
4
posted on
11/28/2013 9:53:21 AM PST
by
Hulka
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
Wrong. Hobby Lobby has never claimed they are against contraceptive on the whole but that they are against abortifacients. There is medical dispute over whether Plan B acts as an abortifacient. Remember too the ACA also covers devices such as IUDs which can cause abortion.
5
posted on
11/28/2013 9:55:35 AM PST
by
lastchance
("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
What a stupid article. The author can justify any type of evil government action based on his final argument.
6
posted on
11/28/2013 9:56:45 AM PST
by
aimhigh
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
First, the Obamacare mandate also applies to non-corporations (sole proprietorships, partnerships, etc.). Second, it also applies to those employers who self-insure, so they WOULD be forced to pay directly for that stuff.
7
posted on
11/28/2013 9:57:15 AM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
“and that they should not be paying to provide them for their customers.”
Their CUSTOMERS?
Here’s the deal. They should not be FORCED by the GOVERNMENT to pay for this stuff if they don’t want to. NO ONE SHOULD! Get it? It’s FREEDOM itself that is at stake here.
8
posted on
11/28/2013 9:58:03 AM PST
by
MestaMachine
(My caps work. You gotta earn them.)
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
Jason Hines, an attorney, is completing his PhD in church-state studies at Baylor University. Sigh.
9
posted on
11/28/2013 9:58:27 AM PST
by
Washi
To: Cementjungle
‘Ill pay for your condoms if you pay for my ammunition.’
Funny but not correct. Two wrongs don't make a right. The gov’t has no business buying my ammo or forcing companies to buy certain kinds of insurance.
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
Hobby Lobby was providing for the contraceptives they now are against and that their only problem really seems to be that the government is now obligating them to do what they were already doing. Indeed. I wonder if he thinks there's a difference between donating to a charity and taxation.
11
posted on
11/28/2013 10:01:07 AM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
"...their only problem really seems to be that the government is now obligating them to do what they were already doing."Maybe this will get the writer's former girl friends to regret dumping him, but as serious legal argument it fails. Even if it's "their only problem," government "obliging them" is not a tangential issue. That's pretty much the problem most of us have with this hateful law, and that's without a host of other non-trivial issues with its process and its institution.
12
posted on
11/28/2013 10:03:00 AM PST
by
Prospero
(Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
If Hobby Lobby can remove contraception from employees health care, why cant Jehovahs Witnesses remove blood transfusions?I'm getting ready to make some side dishes. Any six-year-old Freepers want to take this one?
13
posted on
11/28/2013 10:04:32 AM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
As slavery is illegal, the only requirement an employer has is to provide a paycheck. Unions formed so as to push working conditions safety and adequate compensation. At what point did the employer become required to provide health care? (oh, yeah, ObominationCare) Health care was a "perk" provided by the employer to attract higher caliber employees. Why shouldn't the employer decide what is, and what is not, purchased as a perk for the benefit of the employee? A "mandate" equals one-size-fits-all socialism. That's not the American way.
14
posted on
11/28/2013 10:05:41 AM PST
by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
The fact that the author refers to a “primer” from the Center for American Progress tells me all I need to know.
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
If corporations can be forced to provide things that are against the owners’ religious beliefs because corporations aren’t people, how can they force corporations to provide anything?
16
posted on
11/28/2013 10:09:54 AM PST
by
VerySadAmerican
(".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
To: Washi
Baylor....you’re right. Very sad. Maybe Ken Starr is making Baylor PC because he has to please the “moderates” in order to get the big donations.
17
posted on
11/28/2013 10:11:55 AM PST
by
VerySadAmerican
(".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
To: aimhigh
Too many blue spoon attorneys seem to believe that the earning of a juris doctorate means they are geniuses and know better for you than you do. Not so. It usually means they either came from a family of wealth andwere raised by nannies and were told they were superior to humans all of their lives. Those that earned it that didn’t come fom money are a totally different breed, driven, and make up a signiicantly small percentage of the licensed attorneys per my own personal experience having been aroundthem 30 + years. Just my personal observation.
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
I reject the author’s premise.
To: ReligiousLibertyTV
If the argument can be made, “Keep the government out of my bedroom”, why NOT “Keep the government out of my health insurance policy”?
20
posted on
11/28/2013 10:14:48 AM PST
by
count-your-change
(you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson