Posted on 11/28/2013 9:49:22 AM PST by ReligiousLibertyTV
The actual point of the ObamaCare mandate is to force employers to pay for something which they disapprove of. And whoso pays for something, promotes that thing, willy nilly.
This is far from the least intrusive means to the putative end; the very intention of the mandate is to violate the conscience of those it constrains.
The “Debate” is not about contraceptives, it is about liberty! It is about stopping busy body individuals dictating how you must live your lives. How YOU must bend to their will. Or suffer the consequences. I say no! RESIST Evil!
Good lord.
The liberals, perverts, libertines all---they are saying,
"You must stay out of my bedroom, but you must be forced to pay for what I do in my bedroom, and you must pay for the means to eliminate whatever consequences occur from my bedroom activities that I don't like. . . but remember, you are not allowed to judge what takes place in my bedroom."
And the First Amendment does not limit its protection of religious liberty to persons anyway: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." That means "free exercise" by persons AND by corporations, in whatever degree a corporation can be said to practice any values.
The same people who condemn corporations as "evil" will not admit that corporations can be "good."
There is no legal reason whatsoever that a corporation cannot claim the same constitutional legal protections as an individual.
Wrong. Obamacare requires people to pay for abortificients.
FWIW, I used to know some of the faculty at Baylor pretty well, and visited there fairly often for conferences and other reasons. I’m afraid I got the impression that Baylor is no longer a truly Christian university—especially at the top levels. It’s kind of the Notre Dame of Baptist universities.
Hines is an idiot who doesn’t understand the difference between “choose to provides” and “must provide”.
“Liberty For Me But Not For Thee”
Love the cultists in spite of their hypocrisies....
Well, child sacrifice is the abomination that causes desolation, so even God has a blood red line we can not cross without His judgment. He will not forgive a nation under that one circumstance.
“However, the LORD did not turn from the fierceness of His great wrath with which His anger burned against Judah, because of all the provocations with which Manasseh had provoked Him. And the LORD said, “I will remove Judah also from My sight, as I have removed Israel. And I will cast off Jerusalem, this city which I have chosen, and the temple (house) of which I said, ‘My name shall be there’.”
“Surely at the command (mouth) of the LORD it came upon Judah, to remove them from His sight because of the sins of Manasseh, according to all that he had done, and also for the innocent blood which he shed, for he filled Jerusalem with innocent blood; AND THE LORD WOULD NOT FORGIVE.” (All caps mine) 2 Kings 23: 26 & 27 and 24: 3 & 4
A person does not and cannot surrender or relinquish his or her fundamental human rights by choosing to become a member of or participant in a corporation. I would further contend that it is not within my power to reject or abrogate my rights, inasmuch as they are inherent to my personhood. Neither can a government abrogate those rights. Government can either acknowledge their existential reality and defend them, or it can arbitrarily and improperly declare then non-existent and of no account - - and violate them.
hmmmm...That's almost exactly what Slutz Inc. founder Sandra Fluke said the other day
Is this one of the new Talking Points from Obama Central?
Many if not most main line Christian churches do make a distinction between birth control and abortificients. The owners of Hobby Lobby reject abortificients.
The Catholic church has a different and valid argument of their own.
As has already been pointed out though, the real argument shouldn't be about either but about freedom from government tyranny.
The problem is the federal gov’t should not dictate a one-size-fits-all health insurance plan.
That is the removal of choice from the citizens.
I suspect Mr. Hines graduated at the bottom of his class.
Hines is an idiot who doesn’t understand the difference between “choose to provides” and “must provide”.
I get the impression that "ReligiousLibertyTV" and "Hines" are one and the same.
Is that true ReligiousLibertyTV?
I'm in a different reality from the current situation. I have no idea why insurance would even cover medications or anything else that are choices which an individual makes.
Dear Mr. Hines,
Please review the historical saying: “Give me liberty or give me death.”
You and your leftist friends have declared war on people of conscience. It really does not matter whether you agree or disagree with contraception. The bottom line is you are starting a WAR.
Let me be clear. This is not figurative language. Obamacare is going to kill people. Not figuratively. Literally.
And there are many people who are not willing to live under tyranny and are not afraid of dying.
So you need to ask yourself, Mr. Hines, “Is your right to free contraception worth Revolution 2?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
