Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laptop searches by agents at border OK, U.S. judge says
CBC News ^ | Jan 02, 2014 | AP

Posted on 01/02/2014 4:34:13 PM PST by rickmichaels

U.S. border agents should have the authority to search laptop computers carried by news photographers and other travelers at international border crossings without reasonable suspicion, a federal judge in Brooklyn ruled this week.

In a written decision on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Edward Korman granted a government motion to dismiss a lawsuit filed by civil rights attorneys who claimed the practice was unconstitutional and sought to have it halted.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbc.ca ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: amendments; billofrights; bordersearch; laptops; wtf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: DManA

I sincerely hope not. What a horrible thought.


41 posted on 01/02/2014 6:54:01 PM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Its OK because the South lost the Civil War


42 posted on 01/02/2014 6:57:13 PM PST by Rome2000 (THE WASHINGTONIANS AND UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE ARE THE ENEMY -ROTATE THE CAPITAL AMONGST THE STATES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DManA; La Lydia
My theory is every lap top in the country has child porn on it somewhere.

Every computer can be infected with such materials - not necessarily intentionally. Here is an example of how it can be trivially done with no tools whatsoever.

Here, between these brackets, is an image: [] - can you see it? Its visible width and height is set to 1x1 pixel. Your eyes probably will ignore a speck of dust like that. But your computer downloads the entire image and stores it in the cache in its original format, however large it may be. (In this case it's 800x587 pixels.) This image is technically "on your computer," and there is no difference whatsoever if you downloaded it to watch in full size, or you downloaded it because it's part of some Web page and you never saw it. It's not trivial to prove that you haven't browsed to that image intentionally. The proof would require showing the Web page that contained the <img src="..."> tag with that URL. You are mostly OK if you are an expert in computers and know what to look for; or if your lawyer can hire a competent specialist. Everyone else will be convicted because the prosecution will not look for exculpatory evidence, and the public defender has no time or money to spend on digging the facts up.

I used this innocent image from Wikipedia for this example. But the attacker can use any image that he likes - even images that are not publicly known or seen by anyone. To plant this mine he only needs to write a HTML message, just like this one, and wait for the victims to collect the illegal payload, all without knowing it and without even being able to know about it.

There are countermeasures. The easiest, and the only one that a non-geek can afford, is to configure the browser so that all temporary files are removed after you close the browser. This does not entirely eliminate the cache because deleted files can linger for months on a large drive. But going into secure wipe software gets complicated fast. Seasoned geeks would browse in a VM with reverting to a snapshot after they are done. Another way to do it is by using a Live CD distribution of Linux, where nothing that you browse is saved on the hard disk. Firefox has some add-ons that can control automatic loading of images from some sites but not from other. Blocking ads entirely (using AdBlock and Ghostery and NoScript) would be a good first step because ad networks do not screen submitted ads, and from time to time undesirable images are sent to millions of customers.

43 posted on 01/02/2014 7:43:28 PM PST by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels
He also cited previous rulings finding that the Fourth Amendment constitutional right against unreasonable searches doesn't apply to the government's efforts to secure international borders from outside threats.

Is there some clause in the Constitution stating that the Fourth Amendment can be ignored in this case? Or are these previous rulings based on some judge's whim to abrogate the Bill of Rights?
44 posted on 01/02/2014 8:03:48 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoKoolAidforMe

This electronic device search applies to border inspections, not domestic travel with TSA.


45 posted on 01/02/2014 8:52:49 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

bookmark


46 posted on 01/02/2014 9:48:16 PM PST by Faith65 (Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
it’s not okay, the judge should be hung. or tarred and feathered for real.

You're far too kind to this kind of traitor.

47 posted on 01/03/2014 8:53:16 AM PST by MeganC (Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Be sure to use a hard drive password and if you use Windows 7 also be sure to use Bitlocker with an external USB key so the computer can’t be read or copied without the USB key.


48 posted on 01/03/2014 8:54:51 AM PST by MeganC (Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
"Secret Agent Man to ASOC

will you help them by pulling your undies down and slapping the vaseline on yourself?

good grief."


No, but I will keep my computer from being destroyed by a ham fisted idiot with a badge and a gun.

I don't sit and bitch on line, I message my congress-critter. Paper and email. And I vote in every election.

The CONgresscritters still don't care, because it was them that voted for the law to begin with.

Recognizing reality is the first step in protecting what you still can.

49 posted on 01/03/2014 10:09:42 AM PST by ASOC (What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Sorry if i came across too harsh. I know reality is reality. It just seemed like you were so resigned to it it sounded kind of Stockholm-syndromish.


50 posted on 01/03/2014 2:35:24 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DManA

The so-called “border exemption” extends 100 miles inland from the border. That includes the population of the Eastern Seaboard, Miami, Houston, the west coast, and Chicago .


51 posted on 01/26/2014 7:37:46 PM PST by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad and lived with his parents .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson