EXPEDIENCY OVER PRINCIPLE (Arizona)

boblonsberry.com ^ | 02/27/14 | Bob Lonsberry

[Gritty]

How long will it be before doctors are required by law or court order to perform abortions even if they are against their religious beliefs?

My guess is, not long.

[Hoosier-Daddy]

Would love to see that. the attorney should be Jewish. Irony squared.

[Hoosier-Daddy]

When is the Law versus your soul I’d go with the soul every time

[grania]

I'm with you. Fair warning; I was seriously slammed for views against the law on a previous post.

This law made me nervous. There's just too much opportunity for it being used for "separate but equal" in the name of religion.

I had another thought this morning. If Brewer had signed the law, it would've ended up challenged and probably oterturned. Wouldn't the result of that overturning do religious freedom far more harm than not ever having the law would?

[editor-surveyor]

So go dig a hole and hide in it.

Better to assume that you’ll lose, than to fight and take a chance on winning, especially if losing accomplishes what you really wanted.

Why are you here?

[grania]

Why are you here?

Because it's a place where constitutional conservatives can have differences about issues, and discuss them.

[editor-surveyor]

What is ‘conservative’ about throwing away our freedom?
.

[beachn4fun]

Let’s see what happens when Muslims deny service to homosexuals.

[sauropod]

I did. Hence my reaction.

[airborne]

So you expect her to voice her opinion on EVERY issue that comes up? Does she get to sleep at all?

So you pointed out that she lives there (I didn't know) and so I ask you if she commented on the issue.

And I get this kind of snarky response?

What gives?

[TomasUSMC]

For example, don’t go to the halal store and ask for pork chops, or the kosher butcher and ask for ham

worth repeating.