Eric Holder To State Attorneys General: You Don't Have to Enforce Laws You Disagree With

Townhall ^ | March 11, 2014 | Katie Pavlich

[yoe]

Attorney General Eric Holder is taking the lawless attitude of the Obama administration and passing it down to state attorneys general. Yesterday during an interview with The New York Times, Holder said state attorneys general do not have to enforce laws they disagree with, specifically when it comes to the issue of gay marriage.

It is highly unusual for the United States attorney general to advise his state counterparts on how and when to refuse to defend state laws. But Mr. Holder said when laws touch on core constitutional issues like equal protection, an attorney general should apply the highest level of scrutiny before reaching a decision on whether to defend it. He said the decision should never be political or based on policy objections.

“Engaging in that process and making that determination is something that’s appropriate for an attorney general to do,” Mr. Holder said.

In 2011, the Obama administration announced attorneys in the Department of Justice would not enforce the Defense of Marriage Act, which was later struck down in 2013 by the Supreme Court.

[coloradan]

These officials that represent elected positions in government at all levels swear an oath to uphold and enforce the law.

Whoa! Don't they swear an oath to uphold and defend *the Constitution*?! How could legislators swear to uphold the law, anyway? It's their job to change the law.

I don't think you're correct here.

[coloradan]

A check on the power of the legislature is that cops don’t have to enforce laws they don’t want to, for one. Please read my post #9.

[Tenacious 1]

I suppose you are correct regarding the law vs the Constitution.

[Sloth]

But Mr. Holder said when laws touch on core constitutional issues like equal protection 2nd Amendment rights, an attorney general should apply the highest level of scrutiny before reaching a decision on whether to defend it.

There, I fixed it.