Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Obama nominee faces confirmation struggle: Another Democratic Rebellion in Less than 2 weeks
American Thinker ^ | 03/18/2014 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 03/18/2014 7:00:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Another stupid Democrat trick threatens to blow up in the face of Harry Reid like Wylie Coyote lighting an exploding cigar given to him by the Roadrunner.

In theory, Harry Reid’s “nuclear option” change to simple majority Senate confirmation ought to have ushered in easy confirmation for even the wackiest left wing nominees to high posts in the federal government. But those pesky voters are going to speak in November, and thanks to ObamaCare a growing list of Senate Democrats up for re-election fear accountability. So all of a sudden, confirmation is no sure thing:

Burgess Everett and Josh Gerstein report in Politico:

President Barack Obama is quickly discovering that getting his nominees confirmed is no simple matter, even with the Senate’s filibuster gutted and Republicans sidelined.

The White House is facing its second Democratic rebellion in less than two weeks over a nomination that’s drawn quick opposition from rural Democratic senators. Obama has enough trouble with the GOP, which is nearly united in opposing Vivek Murthy’s nomination to become surgeon general, but it’s his own party that is again in position to derail another presidential pick.

Democratic Senate aides estimated on Monday that from eight to 10 Democrats may oppose Murthy’s nomination if the vote were to be held soon, mostly because of his left-leaning views on gun policy, which have attracted opposition from the National Rifle Association. An aide closely following the nomination described a vote for Murthy as carrying “very little political or policy gain but plenty of downside.”

What has really got to worry Democrats is the prospect of a post-2016 Republican president employing the nuclear option to appoint reformers to high positions on the federal government.


(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: confirmation; obama; surgeongeneral

1 posted on 03/18/2014 7:00:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bring it on Barry!


2 posted on 03/18/2014 7:04:36 AM PDT by immadashell (The inmates are running the asylum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If Republicans win the Senate, the lame duck Democrats will change the rules back and dare the Republicans to employ the nuclear option. You can take that to the bank.


3 posted on 03/18/2014 7:05:21 AM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have to admit that eliminating the filibuster for nominees is providing unanticipated benefits.

Dem Senators from Red/Purple states no longer have the option to act as free-riders on Republican-led filibusters, nor do they have the ability to cast votes for hard-left nominees under the justification that they were just standing up to GOP obstructionism.

Now they’re looking at actually having to defend their votes, on their merits. And for a good number of them going home to a pretty pro-2nd Amendment constituency and explaining why they voted to put an extremist gun-grabber into the position of Surgeon General - where he’s promised to make gun control the public-health issue long demanded by other extremist gun-grabbers - is going to be a pretty uncomfortable experience.


4 posted on 03/18/2014 7:09:49 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

How will they able to change it back, considering it belongs to the majority & DIMs will be in the minority?


5 posted on 03/18/2014 7:11:52 AM PDT by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Williams

“the lame duck Democrats will change the rules back”
Yup! You can bank on it. I predicted they would do just that on the day they changed the rule. It’s obvious!


6 posted on 03/18/2014 7:13:09 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
I have to admit that eliminating the filibuster for nominees is providing unanticipated benefits.

An example of the adage "Be careful of what you ask for, you might just get it"?

7 posted on 03/18/2014 7:15:23 AM PDT by aragorn (We do indeed live in interesting times. FUBO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SIRTRIS

They will change it in the lane duck Congressional session.


8 posted on 03/18/2014 7:16:50 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

The other great benefit of this change is the gang of eight RINO’s are no longer needed and have no power and get no airtime. Used and discarded by the press LOL


9 posted on 03/18/2014 7:25:08 AM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

Agree, enough with the voting for cloture than voting no scam


10 posted on 03/18/2014 7:29:41 AM PDT by italianquaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
QUOTE: They will change it in the lane duck Congressional session.

Not to worry, McConnell will change it right back on day 1 of the 114th congress. /S

No, he will reach across the aisle...

11 posted on 03/18/2014 7:53:03 AM PDT by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Williams

The Democrats won’t have to change anything back,the feckless Republican party will do it for them


12 posted on 03/18/2014 7:53:43 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Good old Barack Obama.

Anything he can do to mess up America, absolutely anything. I expect the bast'd to touch off some nukes on American soil.

13 posted on 03/18/2014 7:56:26 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

I think you may be on to something.


14 posted on 03/18/2014 8:50:26 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just like the blue/red switch trick -

Attention Lifson & headline-writers:
it’s
DEMOCRAT

not
democratIC

chaps my britches, because it’s subtle, subliminal...


15 posted on 03/18/2014 8:51:17 AM PDT by spankalib ("I freed a thousand slaves. I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spankalib
chaps my britches, because it’s subtle, subliminal...

Same here.

16 posted on 03/19/2014 6:37:16 AM PDT by houeto (We intend to liberate Democrats from the dreaded Job-Lock this November!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Suffice it to say that B. Hussein Obama “is on the wrong side of History.”

FORWARD !


17 posted on 03/19/2014 6:39:29 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson