Posted on 03/18/2014 7:24:02 AM PDT by mandrews222
I had come to the same conclusion by examining the available data. I am quite familiar with that area and that particular route. I have flown it a lot of times.
My guess is they want the airplane…passengers are probably dead. That is a no brainer…simply don the O2 masks in cockpit and reach up and throw the pressurization switch and bingo 2 minutes later everybody is dead.
APPARENT HIJACKING OF MALAYSIA FLIGHT 370 ON MARCH 8, 2014
I have annotated the best available satellite “ping” data and Malaysian military skin-track radar data on the undoubtedly hijacked Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. This is not what the “experts” and government authorities want you to hear. The likely search area is much narrower than they have led us to believe. I have marked the official Malaysian government map released by the Prime Minister green (the black-gray lines and words in black-gray letters such as “Last known possible position …” and the red arcs are all official Malaysian map graphics). The second map, below the top map, is from the NY Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernfreepress.com ...
I’m with you on this, except I think Aliens Did It!
“My guess is it’s in Bangladesh.”
My guess is some obscure military base being fitted for
Obamas black flag. It would be in China and Russia’s best
interest to keep the Obama in office as long as possible and
what better way than to give him an excuse to suspend an
election or two. They know that Obama is more of a threat
to America than they are combined.
I’ll bet this plane will ‘reappear’ and with a full tank of fuel.
Guess where.
Someone is holding back info...and they may think its for our own good...
I find it hard to believe that if it flew north or northwest over land that it would not have been picked up on Chinese and/or Indian radar.
The arc there is based upon the last ping but where are the arcs of the four previous pings???
malaysia
Sobering thought.
bttt
Plane’s been found. According to The Star, it’s on the moon.
Is that next to the "EASY" button?
Don’t all planes have an air traffic controller assigned to keep track of them? So - whose job was it to keep their eyeballs on this one?
“No way China would let it fly that distance without an intercept.”
Unless the Chinese military was in on it.
Something has struck me as odd.
This takes place at the same time as Putin, with the backing of China, is acting up somewhat with shades of the Cuban missile crisis.
It also has shades of when the Clintons would get into trouble during the 1990’s.
The Chinese would threaten to nuke the West coast so everyone on the right and left in this country would rally around support Clinton.
If this is to be used as a weapon to attack the US it will come from the west most likely.
One object of the left has been to make sure the US isn’t the sole superpower in the world.
Putin and China make a complete fool out of Obama and the left blames the “Right Wing Extremist TEA Party” for not supporting him. We are seeing this in the left wing news right now.
Blaming it on the “RWE and TEA Party” for being against Obama has shades of what the Clinton’s did with the OKC bombing.
Russia and China are then considered Superpowers on equal footing with the US.
How could all of these come together at the same time without it being planned that way?
If 40 people had seen the pilot waving a red flag out the window it probably would have been true.
Never a good idea to prejudge information that conflicts with our structured ideas of what ‘should have been’... To weight it differently is fine but to ignore it is a mistake.
It was handed over to Ho Chi Minh aircontrollers but then turned around before it checked in.
I can’t sign on to a Boeing 777 of any type being flown into Indian airspace without being detected. However, I’ve qualified remarks prior stating everything is dependent on the US & other militaries providing factual & complete info.
This also relies on the so-called ‘last ping’.
I’m confused: If the plane responded to a ping, it transmitted data, as it was a maintenance signal for the engines & plane’s attitude, right? (that’s what the public has been told)
Then why did both Boeing & Rolls Royce deny receiving any engine data, all while being reported that the ‘pings’ are sending data, ostensibly on airspeed & altitude? Either data was sent by the plane, & received by Boeing, or it wasn’t.
If the engine data is being sent by ACARS, as Boeing asserts, then what is this ‘ping’ that has everyone looking in the potentially wrong places?
IMHO: It doesn’t matter.
I’m so done with this ‘distraction’: It’s a tragedy (all souls lost) and the public is being served a stage drama courtesy of multiple governments, agencies & militaries.
Either the simplest theory is the answer, or this is one of the most diabolical & well-planned plots (replete with clever & highly-technical misdirection)...all over a single airliner, which could have been acquired much easier for nefarious purposes, imho.
If it matters, here is the latest bs
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/malaysia/10704769/Malaysian-Airlines-MH370-live.html
You know what they say about opinions; I’m guilty, too.
On that note, I have business to attend to...
One of the statements in the story is to the effect that the aircraft did the 45,000 to 5,000 thing.
Ignoring the fact that there was no transponder return and no mode C.
Throughout the articles, there is not one single verifiable quote, fact, link, etc,, to support the truth of this statement.
Lots of pictures of passengers in the cabin of similar aircraft but not one single factual quote from an ATC controller, a military radar facility, etc.
The writer should be banned from the “profession” of journalism for life and anyone placing any credence in the article should go sit in the corner.
The article is BS from beginning to end.
By the way, not only can ATC not see the altitude of aircraft not displaying a mode C, ATC facilities can in very busy areas turn off all primary returns so that they see only transponder equipped aircraft.
No one has presented any information as to the capabilities of the area radars and under what conditions they were operating.
A basic description of how transponders work.
http://public-action.com/911/transpon/
The low-level scenario raises another question: what about the radar altimeter? Flying across the open water is more difficult that most people imagine—much tougher to gauge your altitude against a huge, flat, blue backdrop. So, pilots would want to use their radar altimeter. That signal could be detected by any vessel, aircraft or nation with an ELINT capability.
One drawback: all 777s use the same type of altimeter, so you could have multiple signals across the project flight path(s). However, if you could correlate a radar altimeter signal with a “data-less” ACARS ping, you might have a better idea regarding Flight 370s flight path.
Also, the longer at low altitude, the more fuel you burn, and your range is decreased. Again, it would be very helpful to know how long he was below 20K, and it’s impact on the fuel load.
I agree 100%. This information is surely being withheld intentionally. It would, as you state, narrow the search to a very small target area. The Big Guys know where that search area is and are certainly keeping it secret. I'm betting it will leak out. Whatever area it is must be receiving a lot of attention. That focus will be noticed. Keep your eyes open and your ear to the ground.
And, by the way, any interested party could plot those points assuming that the author of the article is correct about the routes and the air speed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.