Posted on 03/21/2014 2:24:28 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
Did not expect Breitbart to hit us with a “Paul is racist” article.
Paulista’s suck.
Rand Paul is an appealing candidate to many conservatives. But he has a fatal libertarian streak on social issues that will make his candidacy in 2016 a non-starter for convictional conservatives.
_____________________________________
Boom. Right from the gate this article is right on.
Is that a hairpiece on Rand Paul’s head?
“Liberty unrestrained by morality is just license”
That’s a great quote. I just googled it to see who said it. Apparently Brian Fischer said it.
Ted Cruz is good to go, if had something defamatory in his NSA file he’d already be crying in the corner in tandem with Boenher and sharing a bottle of scotch.
This needs to be spread far and wide.Thank you.
Any average looking man who so much as criticizes Hillary will be vilified as 'sexist' in the media, just as they are now vilified as 'racist' for criticizing 0bama.
A REALLY REALLY good looking man could steal female voters away from Hillary, since all they're really focused on is style (not substance), anyway. The other hopeful scenario is 'female vs. female' which negates any charges of 'sexism' in the media.
Sad, but this is today's America. Why do think the Dems run black candidates and then a female candidate? 'Protected class (blacks, Hispanics and females)' beats 'evil white guy' EVERY TIME.
here we go again. Hillary has to be pleased.
In 1859, people who advocated stuff like this were called "doughfaces". The non-doughfaces ran the table, burned down South Carolina and Virginia, and won it all as decisively as a million dead people could avail to define "decisively". Anyone who'd opposed them was dead, in exile, in prison, or stripped of his civil rights by government decree, and essentially a prisoner in his own country. That's pretty "decisive".
Paul's pretty close to saying that conservatism has been defeated in detail .... without having any evidence for his claim.
Other than that it walks right past both Pauls' gigantic deficiencies in foreign and defense policy.
The author gives us a phony, head-faking "concession" on the libertarianism on "social issues" (while muttering under his breath, "who cares about social issues already?!"), and then tries to sneak the other stuff past us, on his way to concluding that "Paul's gotta be the guy".
Paulbot bullsqueeze from the git.
Wrong Paul the less is not the candidate for ever.
Can't comment candidly on this statement.
Say what? From the headline, to the opening sentence, to the conclusion...
“Bottom line: when it comes to 2016, Rand Paul is not the guy. But Ted Cruz might be.”
This is as anti-Paul as it gets.
Who was that democrat Congressman used to run around with a badger on his head?
That's why we got McCain and Romney. They could pretend to be conservatives who shared our values, but they couldn't inspire anyone to change their vote since they didn't believe their own campaign rhetoric.
Cruz/Paul could win easily, and do it without RINO elitist backstabbers. Paul's Libertarian bent as VP might stir things up a bit, sure, but he'll be mostly busy dealing with privacy issues.
Traficant. Whatever happened to that guy?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.