Call climate change what it is: violence

The Guardian ^

[AppyPappy]

Maybe they are planning to attack China, the worst Global Warming offender.

Nahhhh....

[Nuc 1.1]

I’ll call it what it is, a fraud.

[FredZarguna]

I didn't post it, so I wasn't being touchy. The Guardian is invariably socialist, except when they're full-throated communist. It's pretty common to tag the articles with "Mega-Barf Alerts," but that seems increasingly unnecessary as we spiral down into the abyss...

[Caipirabob]

The left setting up the logic to use violence to suppress "climate violence."

Oh please...just try it.

[PapaNew]

IMO, I think it would help to put some kind of parenthetical disclaimer after a lying Leftist headline. They are not always so obvious, sometimes quite subtle. A disclaimer helps when you have time to glance at the headlines but don’t have time to read the zillions of articles. It also tells us something of why the poster put it up because as you know, there is a fair amount of disagreement in FR about a fair number of issues. Unfortunately, many seem to be taken away from the big gorilla issue ($4 Trillion life-and-freedom-threatening federal government) by disagreements on “peripheral” issues. (IMO, all political issues are minor compared to the big government problem which threatens our freedoms and way of life.)

[PapaNew]

I’m more concerned about Americans growing up not knowing ANY history earlier than the Fabian/Progressive Socialist-dominated 20th century.

[houeto]

Or, you could, say, write a book that claims harmless DDT is causing mass extinctions, and then when DDT is banned, lament the millions of deaths needlessly caused in Africa by malaria-bearing mosquitos.

Spot on zipper. I could add many other examples as I am sure you could as well.