Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds: Safety concerns led to Nevada cow release
AP ^ | 4/13/2014 | MARTIN GRIFFITH

Posted on 04/13/2014 3:50:46 AM PDT by markomalley

Federal land managers say "escalating tensions" led them to release all 400 or so head of cattle rounded up on public land in southern Nevada from a rancher who has refused to recognize their authority.

"Based on information about conditions on the ground and in consultation with law enforcement, we have made a decision to conclude the cattle gather because of our serious concerns about the safety of employees and members of the public," Kornze said in a statement.

Hundreds of states' rights protesters, including militia members, showed up at corrals outside Mesquite to demand the animals' return to rancher Cliven Bundy. Some protesters were armed with handguns and rifles at the corrals and at an earlier nearby rally.

Las Vegas Police Lt. Dan Zehnder said the showdown was resolved with no injuries and no violence. Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie was able to negotiate a resolution after talking with Bundy, he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: bhoblm; blm; bundy; bundyranch; cattle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: DeWalt

“Doesn’t anyone find it odd that this supposed Federal court action was not carried out by Federal Marshals. They are the courts enforcement arm. Not the BLM. Me thinks this was a bluff by BLM and not a Legal Order.”

I was wondering the same. LEO’s are always clearly identified as to which agency they work for. Can anyone spot identifying logos on the BLM Enforcers?

http://www.criminaljusticeinformation.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/us-marshal.jpg


81 posted on 04/13/2014 8:00:53 AM PDT by Duke C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

” I fully expect the Federals to be back at Mr. Bundy’s ranch on November 5 or very shortly there after. And back with a vengeance.”

The Bundys should be planning a “reunion” about that time.


82 posted on 04/13/2014 8:00:56 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

Perhaps the instigators will be gone by November


83 posted on 04/13/2014 8:02:32 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
mad_as_he$$:" Even the BLM would of “arrested” the citizens. Shoot out would of been a massacre for all involved. This isn't about cows."

Exactly true !
This isn't about cows ,.. its bigger than that. Its about personal freedoms ,heritage , and cronyism in Government.
This has the potential of becomming a 'range war', and a land grab under Federal authorization, which the Fed doesnt want prior to an election.
Another question not answered is : Why the land was assessed at $38.6 million, and sold at 15% of its value by local government ?
And what was Dingy Harry getting in return, and / or giving away ?
Something going into Harry's retirement fund ?

84 posted on 04/13/2014 8:08:46 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Duke C.

Marshals would be clearly marked and would have served Bundy before action began. Also likely would have had local Sheriffs officials with them at the time. Marshals don’t screw things up this way. Totally illegal action.


85 posted on 04/13/2014 8:10:57 AM PDT by DeWalt (Times are more like they used to be than they are today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots
The Alex Jones live on the scene reporter stressed several times that the folks there were told to leave or they would be shot.

Huntin' ain't no fun when the rabbit's got a gun.

86 posted on 04/13/2014 8:11:33 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt; DaxtonBrown
I refer to Freeper Daxton Brown for all things Reid.
87 posted on 04/13/2014 8:14:42 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

We need congressional hearings. What committee has authority over the BLM?


88 posted on 04/13/2014 8:24:02 AM PDT by Piranha (Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have - Saul Alinsky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lostboy61
Do you believe for a minute that the Chinese want to be involved in dust up like this. What if half the American people said they will not buy anymore China crap from Wally World?

They'll stop loaning us money. Think about what happens then.

89 posted on 04/13/2014 8:29:06 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Shwarzenkaiser: fasionable fascism one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DeWalt

Save


90 posted on 04/13/2014 8:39:49 AM PDT by Helen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

“I wonder how many of the Feds went to their superiors and told them that they would not harm the protesters or the US citizens there as it violated their oath to protect the Constitution? Or their conscience? “

Answer: Most likely, ZERO! The only thing the BLM forgot to bring was their MRAPs.


91 posted on 04/13/2014 8:52:09 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DeWalt

“The Federal courts are pretty consistent with their actions.”

And they are also “pretty consistent” with abusing the citizenry with Federal Law!


92 posted on 04/13/2014 8:56:13 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

No arguments there. Just stating what was wrong with the picture thats being painted now.


93 posted on 04/13/2014 8:58:55 AM PDT by DeWalt (Times are more like they used to be than they are today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: DeWalt

If I understand this right the Secretary of the Interior has the authority to recruit local help in these types of cases:

Ҥ9260.0-3 Authority.

Under section 303(a) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733), the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to issue regulations with respect to the management, use, and protection of the public lands, including property located thereon, the violation of which is punishable as a criminal offense. Section 303(c) of the Act authorizes the Secretary to enter into contracts with appropriate local officials having law enforcement authority and to authorize Federal personnel to carry out the enforcement of Federal laws and regulations relating to the public lands and their resources. Section 303(d) of the Act authorizes the Secretary to enter into cooperative agreements with State and local regulatory and law enforcement officials for the enforcement of State laws and local ordinances on the public lands. In addition to general authority under FLPMA, other specific authorities are noted where applicable.”

The BLM operates under title 43 of the CFRs:

http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=9c79a735953caf940c3e472901b6f07a&node=43:2.1.1.9.117&rgn=div5#43:2.1.1.9.117.1.209.1


94 posted on 04/13/2014 9:21:30 AM PDT by Duke C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

I wrote Reid’s only bio. The complexity of the corruption is absolutely stunning. So while Alex Jones had one thread on Rory and Chinese solar, that is only the tip of the iceberg of what is involved. Here’s just a little bit of what I know. http://www.futurnamics.com/reid_bundyranch.php


95 posted on 04/13/2014 9:24:04 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Duke C.

Yes you are correct as for a police action( as in stopping a crime in progress). This, according to BLM, is a court action requiring asset forfeiture and contracts. This court action would be a Marshal assignment which is the enforcement arm of the court. Not BLM.


96 posted on 04/13/2014 9:30:08 AM PDT by DeWalt (Times are more like they used to be than they are today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: DeWalt

In my opinion we need to get after congress to start an investigation of this matter. Who authorized it, why was it such a total mess, was it legal. At the very least someone needs to lose their job and the best outcome would be to have BLM funding cut in half until they figure out what their mission is. It is NOT government land, it belongs to the American citizens.


97 posted on 04/13/2014 9:41:06 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

I agree. To me it was an Extralegal action such as that perpetrated by the IRS. This was strings being pulled and not the serving of a court order. This is why they retreated so quick. They knew they were on shakey ground.


98 posted on 04/13/2014 9:45:58 AM PDT by DeWalt (Times are more like they used to be than they are today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

“The affiliations and backgrounds of EACH mercenary should be investigated. Were any of them “on loan” from any branch of our armed services? Were they “on loan” from private security firms or police departments from around the state....or perhaps Homeland Security thugs from out of state? Who were their “commanders” on the Bundy site and what are their backgrounds?

I’ll bet such an investigation would unearth scads of unholy alliances....and most certainly illegal ones also.”

Excellent point, MinuteGal. Get going Congress. Do your job. The House should take the investigative lead.


99 posted on 04/13/2014 9:52:08 AM PDT by flaglady47 (Oppressors can tyranize only w/a standing army-enslaved press-disarmed populace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Oversight committee?

Issa has his hands full right now (IRS, Benghazi, Fast & Furious):

http://oversight.house.gov/

The Natural Resources Committee oversees the Dept. of Interior:
http://naturalresources.house.gov/


100 posted on 04/13/2014 10:07:59 AM PDT by Duke C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson