Posted on 04/24/2014 7:48:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Doll, Brynn and Kitten (their real names as far as I know) live in Massachusetts. Despite the fact that Massachusetts legalized same-sex marriage via court edict years ago, it still oppresses those who wish for something more.
Brynn and Doll dated for eight months before moving in together. Two years later, they purchased a house together.
Having both enjoyed polygamous relationships before, Doll and Brynn looked for a third woman to join them. After a few failed liaisons, Doll and Brynn created an OKCupid couple’s profile. Eventually, they received a message from Kitten.
Good ol’ OkCupid, flinging the arrows of love hither and yon. Except when it’s flinging hate at Brendan Eich, anyway.
Doll, Brynn and Kitten went for dinner at a Chinese Restaurant for their first date and immediately liked each other.
Doll says: ‘There was an instant attraction with Kitten but I think we all really bonded when we baked cookies together on our fourth date. I didn’t know what love was until the three of us clicked like that.’
Brynn adds: ‘With Doll and Kitten, things finally made sense. It was as if the puzzle was finally complete with all three pieces.’
Within a few months, Kitten moved in with Doll and Brynn. Two years later, they decided to get married after Kitten proposed the idea to them.
Kitten says: ‘I had always wanted to get married and I guess Doll and Brynn indulged my wishes! I had a very traditional upbringing and marriage had always been an important symbol of commitment for me. We wanted to celebrate our love in a wedding like everyone else.’
Well, of course. The heart wants what the heart wants.
The threesome spent several date nights planning their dream wedding – making decorations and shopping for matching traditional, white gowns.
Brynn says: ‘Planning our wedding was hectic. It took a lot more organizing because there were three brides involved.
Kitten, Brynn and Doll had to work with the legalities of the state to get married to each other. As being married to more than one person is not currently legal, they had to combine handfasting, legally binding documents and legal marriage.
Well, why isn’t being married to more than one person legal? What’s the rationale behind that? They’re consenting adults, so what’s the big deal? It must be equal parts hatred and intolerance. That’s what the courts keep saying in their rulings on marriage. You may have a problem with the throuple, but who are you to draw the line?
They should sue. They’ll win.
Read the rest. The trio plan to use science and/or adoption to obtain children. It’s a good thing no Catholic will be involved if they go the adoption route.
Without God, everything is OK.
Okay, I’m gonna marry my guitar, but I’m gonna cheat on it with other guitars down the road.
(waiting for inevitable jokes)
Too possessive. And, what about the individuality of the rifle? It's rights? How does the rifle feel about marriage? Perhaps just a committed relationship, or a promise ring?
:-)
CC
Did you get a good look at the one in the middle? Try holding onto her leash after you throw a stick.
That big one may count as two.
When do the lawsuits start against bakers,photographers,and caterers that want nothing to do with this?
There may be something to be said for moresomes. 2 check households won’t be enough as food and energy prices go through the roof. If three, four or more can make it work more power to them. Just don’t call it mariage.
Why not? If two fags can call it "marriage" why not all the other arrangements?
That just sounds like more than 2 people as roommates at any rate. I would do that with friends I get along well with.
one of them looks like a male in a dress
There may be something to be said for moresomes. 2 check households won’t be enough as food and energy prices go through the roof. If three, four or more can make it work more power to them. Just don’t call it mariage.
I think it would be best to start with ALL our federal judges, just so none of them can declare this latest form of madness a basic human right.
So... you have partners A,B and C. A divorces C, but not B. That leaves A and C married to B but not to each other. Sounds workable to me. /s
In another 5 years people will be marrying their dogs and house plants.”””
And suing the local bakeries, wedding planners, and dance halls for a further profit.
2 on the left look like trannies.”””
I can remember when if someone mentioned ‘trannies’, they were talking about transmissions in cars & trucks.
I think that keeping the peace would be a problem.
One wife is more than enough for me to handle.
Soon. Very soon.
Try as a they may, gays will never be like heteros — they can never have children.
And being gay meant that you were happy.
I hereby nominate this for ‘post of the day’. I may have blown a peanut out of my nose while laughing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.