Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Primary Voters Seem Determined to Nominate Candidates Who can Win
RightWing News ^ | May 10, 2014 | Michael Barone

Posted on 05/11/2014 9:04:26 AM PDT by QT3.14

Results of Tuesday’s primaries, particularly the victory of state House Speaker Thom Tillis in North Carolina’s Republican Senate primary, are being hailed — or decried — as a victory for the Republican establishment over the Tea Party movement. There’s something to that. Tillis benefited from support from Karl Rove’s American Crossroads and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and endorsements by Mitt Romney and Jeb Bush.

In contrast, Sen. Rand Paul flew in on the day before the election to campaign for second-place finisher and fellow physician Greg Bannon, who was also endorsed by Tea Party Patriots and FreedomWorks. Mike Huckabee campaigned for the third-place candidate, minister Mark Harris.

(Excerpt) Read more at rightwingnews.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2014; 2016; elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2014 9:04:26 AM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

ya establishment candidates like Romney, McCane, Dole.... there is a winning record for you. They dont care about winning the just want to enjoy control over the corruption...


2 posted on 05/11/2014 9:08:43 AM PDT by Breto (Stranger in a strange land... where did America go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Breto

And... not only have tea party candidates had to defend themselves against the DNC but vicious and covert attacks from the GOP.


3 posted on 05/11/2014 9:10:05 AM PDT by Breto (Stranger in a strange land... where did America go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14
I know some don't want the Senate if we don't have Tea Party folks only, but I am really worried about the Supreme Court. The Conservatives are not exactly spring chickens. Yes I know that Obama gets to pick, but at least maybe we can have somebody that is not all the way to the left that their is no way to become anymore left.
4 posted on 05/11/2014 9:10:26 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Governor Scott Walker 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Breto

Well for every Dole and Romney, we have had an O’Donnell, Akin, and Murdock, Sharon Angle. We don’t have a terrific track record either.


5 posted on 05/11/2014 9:13:59 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Governor Scott Walker 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

A Conservative candidate who cannot win is worse than useless. Such a candidate will enable the election of a RINO at the primary level, or an even worse outcome, a liberal Democrat in a general election.

Conservatism advances only when Conservatives win elections. The dilemma that presents when the Conservative candidate that you prefer cannot win must be resolved in favor of the lesser choice who can prevail against the left. Remember, only about 30% of voters are solid Conservatives. Elections are won by persuading 21% of the rest to vote your way.


6 posted on 05/11/2014 9:17:36 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

While the Akins, Mourdocks, O’Donnells and Angles of the world satisfy the anti-GOPe itch at nomination time, unfortunately they don’t hand the political acumen to run a winning campaign. Harry Reid should’ve been long relegated to backbench hell by know, but got a major reprieve when Sharron Angle won the primary in 2010.

While I strongly support the TEA Party’s philosophies, their choices for Senate seats are often lacking.


7 posted on 05/11/2014 9:23:56 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

*HAVE the political acumen


8 posted on 05/11/2014 9:24:55 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

GOP spends more money defeating conservatives than Democrips. Remember that.


9 posted on 05/11/2014 9:26:43 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Because establishment picks like Tommy Thompson and Rick Berg have a great record of success.


10 posted on 05/11/2014 9:27:25 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

It is hard to change stupidity.


11 posted on 05/11/2014 9:29:00 AM PDT by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
If the conservative can't win, I'm not voting for the liberal, D or R. Too bad if that upsets some folks.

/johnny

12 posted on 05/11/2014 9:38:06 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14
Republican voters. Ah, we don't KNOW that.
13 posted on 05/11/2014 9:46:39 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

I’m with you John.

What’s the difference being different
When it’s difference now that looks alike
You say I’m changing, I’m not sure that’s wrong


14 posted on 05/11/2014 9:49:25 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

It only upsets those who have to live under liberal rule. Those who side on the sideline are giving someone else their choice.


15 posted on 05/11/2014 9:50:53 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
I won't vote for a liberal (R). That's just the way it works now. Lots of conservatives have decided the same.

You enablers of liberal republicans are going to start losing.

Besides, when the GOP-E held both houses and the presidency, they governed like liberals. They don't have a great track record of governing like conservatives.

/johnny

16 posted on 05/11/2014 9:55:31 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Those who sit on the sidelines awaiting the arrival of the perfect candidate earn the privilege of being called the losers Those who win invariably treat them that way.


17 posted on 05/11/2014 9:59:18 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

The republican party isn’t concerned about people like us so I don’t know why you should be. In fact the Rs seem eager for me to leave. Do everything they can to let me know I’m not welcome in their little club.


18 posted on 05/11/2014 9:59:44 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

This idea that we are waiting for a “perfect” candidate is a lie. Trotted out thousands of times a day but a lie none the less.


19 posted on 05/11/2014 10:01:04 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DManA

That does not strike me as much of a plan for success.


20 posted on 05/11/2014 10:01:45 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson